Mexican Revolution: Diaz´s Administration and Beyond Essay

The Mexican Revolution began as a movement of the middle class protesting against the long-standing dictatorship of Porfirio Diaz. Diaz was an army officer who had came to power after a coup against former president Benito Juárez. Unlike Juárez, Diaz established a stable political system, in which the Constitution of 1857 was bypassed, local political bosses (caciques) controlled elections, political opposition, and public order, while a handful of powerful families and their clients monopolized economic and political power in the provinces.

Díaz would bully and terrify citizens into supporting him. While many civil liberals appeared under his rule, such as, Freedom of press he began to attempt to strengthen his ties with the United States and other influential foreign interests. While Diaz began to seize many lands that once belonged to Mexico and to wealthy non-nationals. Diaz also stated that Mexicans could

José de la Cruz Porfirio Diaz Mori, the 29th president of Mexico, opened Mexico to foreign investors and companies who exploited Mexico’s resources such as land, copper, gold, silver, water, and cheap labor for corporate gain. This caused economic instability in the way that Mexico placed power in the hands of large corporations and Mexican politicians.

Porfirio Diaz was the president of Mexico who was responsible for the modernization and industrialization that took place in the country. His motto was paz, orden y progresso, he didn’t want there to be wars in Mexico like there had been in prior years. He wanted there to be change and progress. In order to accomplish paz y orden he was known to be ruthless and crude. Diaz was not going to tolerate disloyalty or disobedience and for those who chose to do it anyways suffered the consequences. For some it would be exile and for others it would be going to work in the haciendas as peones. Furthermore for the first time Mexico had shown its potential and had begun to catch up with a rapidly changing world. The nation’s achievements in technology and culture went on display around the globe at world fairs and expositions in Europe and the United States (Deeds, Meyer & Sherman, p. 347).

The Mexican Revolution of 1910 set many influences in motion shaping the course of Mexican history between 1920 up into the 2000s. There are several patterns that take its cue from the Revolution include the creation and long standing existence of a one political party rule. The Mexican Revolution is an extremely long and complicated subject to perceive without much background information, but in summation the Revolution was an attempt to end a dictatorship of Porfirio Díaz and to establish a constitutional republic. Many problems arose during the Revolution, including several divided groups lead by strong willed individual lovely referred to as revolutionaries these included Francisco Madero, Pascual Orozco, Pancho Villa, and Emiliano Zapata. With threatening political crisis among competing Mexican elites and the opportunity for agrarian insurgence lead to the outbreak of the Revolution. The Revolution would leave lasting influences such as those on Mexico far beyond the imagination thought possible.

The bourgeoisie, the Mexican middle class, thought of this was unfair for the farming class and protested against the country’s dictator, Porfirio Diaz. Diaz had made some positive contributions to Mexico, such as allowing for a greater educated class and encouraged new economic opportunities. However, Diaz also had most of the wealthy and land controlled by a tyranny that he favored and not caring for the farmers who are doing most of the work to keep the country from starving. So northern landowner and crusading leader, Francisco Madero, supported the bourgeoisie because he wanted more even distribution of opportunity and lessen military and make the Constitution republic. Not only this, but Madero felt that Diaz was a weak leader and broke his promise of improving the land. He had called the Mexican people to have an armed revolt against Diaz. Unfortunately, about 900,000 people lost their lives in the span of the two decades of rebellion. Diaz was replaced by General Victoriano Huerta and had Diaz executed and declared for the Spanish Civil War to be over. This caused the Catholic Church to gain more power and privilege because Huerta abolished the Republican measures that determined the Church’s spiritual and social roles.Huerta became the dictator, but was overthrown by Venustiano Carranza in 1914. Afterwards in 1917, Carranza

In 1861 Benito Juárez, a liberal Mexican, (1806-1872) became president of a country in financial ruin, and he couldn’t repay his debts to European governments. In response, France, Britain, and Spain sent naval forces to Veracruz to demand payment. Britain and Spain negotiated with Mexico and withdrew, but France, ruled by Napoleon III (1808-1873), decided to use the opportunity to carve a dependent empire out of Mexican territory. Late in 1861, a well-armed French fleet stormed Veracruz, landed a large French force and drove President Juárez and his government into retreat.

The Mexico had been conquered by Spain for many years, “Many of the Mayas and Aztecs were forced into slavery. 300 years later, Father Hidalgo began the revolt that would eventually result in Mexico's independence.” (Softschools.com) Miguel stood up the rights and defeated the Spain. He is brave enough to defeat the Spain and bring peace and freedom to the people in 1821. Now the Mexicans got the freedom back, thanks to Miguel.

Mexico suffered ten years of war, suffering, and turmoil. Mexican leaders during 1910-1920 were unable to hold the country together and a revolution consumed the nation. The Mexican people grew tired of political greed, lack of support, and unequal treatment. Several leaders such as President Diaz would prove to be a man of one interest, himself. Others would quickly rise against him and attempt to claim the presidency. General Huerta and Francisco

The United States involvement first seemed supporting and then rejecting Mexican regimes during the period 1910-1920. The United States intervention started when the US government sent two military attack into Mexico. The first one happened in 1914 in Veracruz, and the second one between 1916-1917. President Woodrow Wilson send U.S. troops to Mexico in 1914 which lead to most of armaments and supplies imported for the Mexican army. Then, the quarrel between Wilson and General Victoriano Huerta started which attack the civilian population of the Veracruz. This leads to poor diplomatic relations between Mexico and the United States. then, Huerta was eventually overthrown out from the power which brought the two countries to the margin of World

During the Pofiriato Mexico wanted to become more modernized and to do so, Pofirio Diaz wanted foreign investment. A lot of the investment came from

Another shield of the upper classes was the dichotomy of violence and pacification that the father of Mexico, Poriforio Diaz, bestowed upon the pelados. Robbery and social crimes, such as drunkenness, lead to the imprisonment and shipment of lower class rateros (thieves) to work as hacienda slaves. Johns writes, "It also provided workers for hacienda owners … thousands of these mostly peasant migrants were sent back to the countryside as slave laborers on henequen estates in the Yucatan …" (70). Rurales left the countryside's radicals dead, working, or subdued. However, city police, without all the gaucho flamboyance of the rurales, served as little more than a city joke: "The government and the police captains were as concerned with watching their own lawmen as they were with catching criminals" (72). This lack of discipline and respect further ripped apart the division in the classes. When little could be done to control the lower classes' actions, Mexico City did not turn to the social programs installed by the very countries they tried to mirror. Instead, Diaz lead a strategy beginning in 1866 to pacify the masses with the allowance of social activities like the burning of the Judas's bull fights or parades through West Mexico City. "Revenge on the act of

They rose to prominence in the central valley of Mexico and ruled 5 million people via a tightly-structured system of self-supporting units called calpulli. Each unit had its own governing council, schools, army, temple and land but paid tribute to the supreme leader of the empire. By 1519 Spaniard Hernán Cortés arrived at Veracruz and by May 1521, Cortez and his followers attacked and conquered the Aztecs renaming it to Nueva España (New Spain). The Catholic Church had a major influence over Mexico, and missionaries began arriving in 1523 which built many monasteries and converted millions of people to Catholicism. King Carlos III of Spain expelled the Jesuits from Nueva España in the late 1700s. The Mexican people initiated the Mexican Revolution in 1910. The 10-year civil war resulted in at least 2 million casualties. Finally, in 1934, Lázaro Cárdenas became president and reestablished the ancient ejido system, which established communally shared tracts of farmland.

The book is a non-fiction book written by, Alan Knight and was Published on May 5, 1980.The Mexican Revolution began in 1910, it began as a movement of a middle-class protest against the long standing dictatorship of Porfirio DIaz. In 1876, Diaz, an Indian general in the Mexican Army, took control of the nation and continued to be elected until 1910, he also had held power in 1876-1911. From 1884 to 1911, he was an unofficial ruler from 1880 to 1884, he was a respected political leader. In 1908, DIaz had an interview with an United States journalist James Creelman, and Diaz told James that would be ready for free elections in 1910, so in 1910, Diaz promised the people that he was going to let there be free elections. Porfirio Diaz was born

President, General Porfirio Díaz, an initial “savior” from the recent Presidents Juarez and Sebastian Lerdo de Tejada, remained in power for 35 years, from 1876 to 1911. During that time, Díaz increased Capital flow into the nation, especially from the United States, but Díaz did not carry out any safeguards to protect the nation’s sovereignty. Simultaneously, he increased economic development by internal transportation network improvements, along with the extreme use of natural resources. In reality, Díaz’s technique of earning political power and stability tampered with every principle of democracy, so he destroyed free market concepts by bringing in foreign enterprises with the assistance of assuring government support to the companies. Through skillful use of violence, consolidation of power, electoral fraud, together with political backing from the rich including those with power Díaz defended his supremacy and continued to build upon it.