Mgmt520 Week 1 Assignment Essay examples

E5-2 (Classification of Balance Sheet Accounts) Presented below are the captions of Nikos Company’s balance sheet.

The task for this week was to discuss how the Supreme Court determines which cases to take on. The case that the Supreme Court takes on varies on many different factors, which must go into consideration prior to them choosing a case. The first step in the decision process of the Supreme Court is chose based on four of the nine justices agreeing to grant the petition. The second factor in the decision process is if the justices decide to take a case if it would resolve a major conflict, for example if it would be federal or constitutional. The third reason why the Supreme Court would hear a case is based upon if the lower echelon courts disregard past Supreme Court’s decisions. In this scenario the Supreme Court would take on the case to prove

The Supreme Court makes some of the most important decisions in the United States, which mostly have to do with changes to citizens civil rights or interpretation of certain laws or court cases. When referring to civil rights it usually means the first ten amendments to the Constitution of the United States, which are known as the Bill of Rights. The Supreme Court has the authority to reinterpret these rights and define their limits. One such example of this is in the Supreme Court case Schenck v United States. The focus of this research paper will be to analyze the path Schenck v US took to reach the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court case, the Supreme Court’s verdict, and how the ruling affected the United States and the Public.

The Supreme Court plays a vital role in our society. It has shaped our history and continues to shape our future; however, with every decision that has to be made, there will be varying opinions. To resolve these disputes, the Supreme Court follows strict guidelines to maintain order. These include, but are not limited to, which cases can be heard, who can oversee the hearing, differing opinions in court, evidence presentation, oral argument, motions in court, appearance of counsel, etc.

The Defendants, Reverend Linwood Rooks, Reverend Harriet Yun, and Bald Mountain Community Church, move to dismiss the Complaint on the ground of lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the basis of lack of diversity of citizenship. This Complaint arises out of a dispute regarding the Plaintiff’s, Ernestine Petrillo, investment in one of the defendant’s business ventures. Reverend Rooks and Reverend Yun are pastors at the Bald Mountain Community Church in Bald Mountain, Alabama. The Plaintiff, Ernestine Petrillo, has resided in Alabama all of her life until June of 2015 when she moved to Wisconsin to further her education by attending graduate school. For diversity jurisdiction, the amount in controversy is undisputed, however, Plaintiff has

A corporation is considered a citizen of both; the state of its incorporation and the

According to Cann (2006) argued, “The Court found that is was unreasonable for the state of Idaho to give a statutory preference to the male where both male and female were equally qualified to administer an estate. The Court said Idaho’s reason (administrative efficiency) was irrational because it was based on outmoded stereotypes” (p. 365). The final test that the court applies to equal protection of law cases is the compelling test. This test deals with the individual’s constitutional right to vote and with the individual’s class. For instance, this test deals with racial discrimination of minorities. A great example of this is the Palmore v. Sidotti where the Supreme Court reversed the lower court’s decision to award the custody to the father based solely on race. The court’s reasoning stated that the decision was based on racial prejudice and speculation that the children of interracial marriages suffered social

This recent debate often appears as a fresh controversy, but instead began over a century ago most notably with the Supreme Court

In reaching its decision, Justice Kennedy writing for the plurality rejects the broad reading of Seattle the Court of Appeals used, which applies strict scrutiny to any state action with a “racial focus” that makes it “more difficult for certain racial minorities for other groups” to “achieve legislation that is in their interest.” (1634). The Supreme Court rejects this broad rationale because it would require the Court to determine and declare which political policies serve the “interest” of a group defined in racial terms, which was unnecessary to decide Seattle, has no support in precedent; and contradicts central Equal Protection principles. (1634)

Both articles deal with contemporary issues that are subject to much controversy in our era. The supreme court ruling of both cases show just how a constitutional government works and how judicial review is practiced. Although all parties may not agree with the outcomes of the cases, it is safe to say that the final verdict serves to protect the interest of the people; the main principle for our distant, yet recent revolution, and the creation of a nation destined to serve as a model for the rest of the world.

1. What is the issue? In other words, what question of law had to be addressed by the court in deciding this case?

I think that a federal court can exercise jurisdiction over the parties based on diversity of citizenship. According to the textbook, "when parties to a lawsuit are from different states, a federal court can exercise diversity jurisdiction if the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000. Total diversity of citizenship must exist, however.” In this case, because Joe and Kay were not from the same state, it is a diversity suit. Moreover, “The statute does not mention the citizenship of partnerships, LLCs, and other unincorporated associations, but the courts have tended to regard these entities as citizens of every state of which their members are citizens.” If Café Ole was a corporation, the state citizenship of the owner would be unimportant.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court, even to this day, uses this case as an example as to their power to interpret the constitution and review cases. The Supreme Court has been the deciding factor in many cases that have changed and protected the rights of the people thanks to Chief Justice John

During the reading of the Textbook, “The Legal Environment of Business, 7th edition”, it was discovered that the U.S. Supreme Court heard this case by it initially being decided by a lower court. The plaintiff party then displeased with the decision filed a writ of certiorari, which asks for the U.S Supreme Court to view their records. There are then at least four reasons for the U.S Supreme Court to decide to select the case: the case has to present

The research conducted by the researcher is a qualitative, cross-sectional, descriptive content analysis of selected advertisements from two different magazines published in August 2013 using the different creative concepts as main emphasis.