Michael Frazier 4-10-14 Four Frameworks of Leadership-Unit 3 In

Bolman & Deal suggest that leaders display leadership behaviors in one of four types of frameworks: Structural, Human Resources, Political and Symbolic (Bolman & Deal, 2008). Unlike the other four frames, the Symbolic frame sees an organizational life an ongoing drama: individuals coming together to create context, culture, and meaning as they play their assigned roles and bring artistry and self-expression to their work (Schein, 2004). It is important for leaders who utilize the Symbolic leadership that what he or she does is important. The manager then has to relay this vision to the employees instilling in them that their work and the work of the organization is important and meaningful. Symbolic frame is important to every organization because it takes into account the traditions, ceremonies and rituals that make the company unique from other companies or departments within the organization itself.

According to Bolman and Deal, the core premise of the structural lens is defined as “Clear, well-understood goals, roles, and relationships and adequate coordination are essential to performance” (pg. 44). In an organization, structure is of vital importance, it lays a sturdy foundation which serves to decrease confusion and inefficiency amongst individuals of the organization. The core premise emphasizes that in order for an organization to reach its full potential, goals need to comprehended, appropriate roles need to be assigned to individuals and good management are imperative in bringing together an organization and increasing proficiency, in order to achieve established goals. Structure in an organization serves as the framework, where

In his book, Heraclitean Fire: Journeying on the Path of Leadership, Dr. Michael Cary (1999) introduces us to the theory of the five frames for effective leadership. Organizational life is filled with an abundance of unique challenges and conflict. The Five Frames model serves as a valuable tool to leadership by revealing the alternate perspectives of organization members. According to Carey (1999) “These five frames – rational, human, systems, political, and cultural – offer different angels for looking at organizational life, and each frame’s proposed outline of the key dynamics of situations does have value in understanding why things happen the way they do and what must be a part of any plan to make things better” (p. 91).

A1. Leadership Style Upon conducting research, it is clear that the definition of “leadership” is not agreed upon. It is fluid, based upon many perceptions, situations, and surroundings. According to Robinson (2010), adopting a specific style of leadership is rather futile as it is, “contingent on the personal traits of the leader, the people being led, and the nature of the activity.” Tools are available to help guide potential leaders in determining a preferred style of leadership. For example, utilizing the “Leadership Self-Assessment

This research focuses on four leadership styles that have been used within the organization. These styles play apart in the success of objectives and tasks being accomplished.

Since the beginning of recorded history, leadership has been one of, if not the most important elements in the success or failure of an endeavor. This is whether it involved a prehistoric hunting party or ruling the Roman Empire. Today, leadership is recognized as a vital factor in an organization’s quest to be productive and profitable. For an organization to be competitive and achieve optimum success in the 21st century, it is vital that they employ effective leaders that will be able to communicate their vision and goals, motivate their employees and develop trusting and loyal relationships with its stakeholders. There is no one or best way to accomplish this mission. There have been numerous leadership theories and styles which have been developed over time which can enable leaders to choose which method would be most effective for them in establishing collaborative working relationships and a respectful team environment in a group setting (Landis, Eric A; Hill, Deborah; Harvey, Maurice R, 2014).

Twenty-first century societies could be characterized as the modern humanity with Cutting-edge technology and multiculturalism, with extreme materialism and economical drive. As a result, any modern organization, regardless of its size, type or nature, has to depend upon the factual structures and best management paths to survive in today’s civilization. Lee G.Bolman and Terrence F. Deal’s (2013) book “Reframing Organizations” presents most updated and developed managerial approaches to leadership and structure for the organizations.

Every person has a different definition of what makes a leader. Some feel a leader is inspirational, while others regard leadership as someone who can give criticism and make the tough decisions. Each definition is unique, and each is vague. This is why the definitions of leadership people use aren’t always accurate. Bolman and Deal, however, do an excellent job of presenting four frames of leadership people use to successfully—or unsuccessfully—support and lead a group of people. The four frames presented by the authors are: human resource, symbolic, structural, and political. The human resource frame is used by leaders to empathize with their followers, the symbolic frame is used to inspire and unite followers around a vision, the structural frame is used to emphasize the importance of a process, and the political frame establishes competition and focuses on creating allies.

To be considered an effective leader, it is known to utilize multiple frames. The four frames: Structural Leadership, Human Resource Leadership, Political Leadership, and Symbolic Leadership. Each of these leadership consist of different characteristics, principles, and standards which are practiced to gain efficient leaders. Rosabeth Moss Kanter, a business professor at Harvard Business School has expressed how these four frames are effective by examples during her interview.

Structural Leaders. They focus on rationality, analysis, logic, facts, and the data. They believe in the importance of clear structure and well-developed management systems (Leadership Orientations

My leadership philosophy is all about people, to elaborate on this principle I believe that Soldiers are the Army’s most precious assets as a fighting force. I believe that leadership is treating Soldiers with respect to influence them in order to achieve their full potential and strive to provide them with mentoring along the way.

When it comes to the Four C’s of Leadership, many people have different interpretations of what the four C’s actually are. In my opinion, the four C’s of leadership stand for character, competency, communication, and courage. Similarly, authors Finneran, McKiernan, Rizzo, Roach and Walter have some of the same perspectives. For the most part, throughout all of their web articles, there was an underlying similarity between their ideas of what the four C’s of leadership stand for.

We begin contrasting the structural frame. The structural frame provides clarity, according to Bolman and Deal (2013), a structural frame is a coherent set of ideas or beliefs forming a prism or lens that enables you to see and understand more clearly what goes on from day to day (p. 41). In any organization, people depend on following leaders and managers for clear instructions and idea. For example: In the case study, the Dean Creates a New Normal, the Faculty Senate has already met, discussed, voted and passed a proposal for the restructure of the college and the faculty are content because they assisted the Dean in this decision which does not directly or affect them.

Throughout the modern era, we have had many individuals that have exemplified both great and terrible leadership qualities. Some pursue innovation, adhere to a strict moral code, or attempt to improve the life of millions through their company. There are others whose name cannot be mentioned without the word fraud coming shortly after due to their lack or a moral code. In fact, some the worst leaders in recent history, ruined the lives of thousands simply to make a profit. Perhaps the best way to illustrate this point of a moral leader compared in comparison to a corrupt one. The CEO and founder of the e-commerce giant Amazon.com, Jeff

Structure is vital in shared governance where expertise and knowledge serve as guides to actions. It requires a commitment to the organizational mission and the profession of the organization. The practices must be structured within the rules of the employer and the laws that govern the industry. It also requires consistency in definitions, standardization, and the design of the governance with regular evaluations of performance levels.