Michaela Cullington's Article Summary

Does Texting Affect Writing: A Critical Analysis of the Influence of Text Speak in Student’s Writing

Throughout “Does Texting Affect Writing?” words such as textspeak, communication, writing, writing abilities, students and teenagers are

In Cullington’s views, she explains that “My research suggests that texting actually has a minimal effect on student writing. It showed that students do not believe textspeak is appropriate in formal writing they recognize the difference between texting friends and writing formally and know what’s is appropriate in eat situations.”(Cullington 367). She is demonstrating research to prove her point that people are smart enough to know the diffrence between formal and non-formal writing because they know the difference with the two types of technology texting on a phone and writing an essay on the computer. People knowing the difference between textspeak is what makes it so important to prove the point that technology is helping us. It shows that we can separate the fact that we are texting on our phone which is informal and writing a formal essay we do not feel the need to combine the way we text and the way we formally write. Which goes on to help support and clarifies the point Thompson was trying to make about technology helping us become smarter without knowing that it is.

In Michaela Cullington’s article “Does Texting Affect Writing?” she addresses a superstition that the older generation of today believes to be a possible issue. This issue is the potential for texting via cell phones to negatively affect young peoples’ abilities to write correct, formal papers. In her writing, she logically dismissed these accusations by providing proof against this believe while presenting her defense in a persuasive manner.

After reading Texting and Writing, by Michaela Cullington, I do not agree with many of her viewpoints. Cullington argues that texting does not affect a students writing. Textspeak, the abbreviation and shortening of words like used when writing a text message, does affect the way a student writes because they use the abbreviations, and their writings tend to lack punctuation. When a writer uses excessive abbreviations on a regular basis they can get stuck in the writer’s head causing them to use them in all of their writings. Cullington did make good points of her own opinion on texting and writing in her piece, but I disagree with her and believe that texting and

Have you ever wondered how to discipline your hand without slowing down your mind? In the article by Zoe Ingalls, Sue Ferguson Gussow demonstrates how to. It sounds simple; however, it takes much practice. It is true that disciplining the hand may help you. This has been proven in Ms. Gussow 's freehand drawing class.

In Michaela Cullington’s essay titled, “Does Texting Affect Writing?” the author tests the ongoing question of how today’s youth handles the effects of texting in the education system. Using successful evidence from both sides of the argument as well as participating in her own experiment, Cullington is able to fully demonstrate how texting does not interfere with today’s students and their abilities to write formally in the classroom.

Thesis statement: In this paper, I will discuss how the frequent use of text messaging by teens today negatively affects literacy and I will offer suggestions that parents and teachers can implement and teach in order to raise reading, writing, and vocabulary skills.

Firstly, Michaela Cullington explains the argument of those who believe that texting negatively affects student writing skills. Cullington states that the “National Center for Education Statistics” claim that one-quarter of twelfth-grade students are efficient writers (362). Cullington also declares that Jacquie Ream, who is a former

And then we can play with abbreviated forms. I think this is the same thing as learning to run. A baby first need to learn to walk, and then he can run. We cannot reverse the order of these two things. So, actually texting has no effect to improve children’s literacy, it is just because children have the ability to play with abbreviated forms. Children’s literacy comes from their parents, their teachers rather than texting messages.

Additionally, having social media and the internet, texting, email etc., also creates more chances of writing. Most parents and teachers think that this is causing a downfall in school and literacy capabilities but in reality its actually helping. According to Thompson (Source G), she believes we are in the middle of a literacy revolution. This generation writes more than any other generation before. Most peoples’ writing happens outside the classroom. It

At the beginning of the essay she talks about texting hindering students work and uses examples from teachers who state examples from personal experiences to help give credibility to her argument. As the essay finishes she uses a study she performed on students from high school and college, and high school teachers to suggest that texting has a minimal effect on writing. At the end of the essay the writer (Michaela Cullington) ends with stating her own opinion that texting actually does not affect students’ writing. When thinking about the con from the essay, being that texting does affect writing, one professor believes the actual emoji’s used in texting relay onto the emotions throughout their writing (pg.362). Another teacher believes students are using many ‘textspeak’ words such as ttyl, lol, or simplifying words like gtg instead of saying got to go. This then affects writing by forgetting the importance of using correct language within a paper. Thirdly, some teachers explain the lack of proficient high school senior writers as forgetting punctuation, or capital letters (pg.363). From my personal experience of using ‘texting language’ it’s obvious to remember when to use

Everyone has heard adults complaining and debating about how texting is destroying the younger generation’s ability to write and speak properly. However, people have argued agnaist this point. “Texting properly isn’t writing at all — it’s actually more akin to spoken language,” writes John McWhorter in Is Texting Killing the English Language?. McWhorter has a quite different opinion on if texting is destroying the English Language. He argues that texting is just a way of writing that reads like speaking, which is now the way people communicate with each other.

In today’s society one would not be able to communicate effectively with the world if writing was not involved. People all around the world send emails, texts, and letter to numerous amounts of individuals each second. Talking on the phone is slowly becoming a thing of the past while the writing side of technology is taking over. The meaning of writing is changing in society. Writing used to be specifically for academics or the occasional letter to a loved one. As time has passed writing has taken more forms and more meanings. In the world we live in now writing is classified as texting, emailing, instant messaging, and even comments or tweets on social media. Although writing has these multiple new forms, it still holds its academic side strongly. Everything with meaning in turn affects a person’s day to day life. Writing has the effect of making one more intellectual. Writing has become a bridge between communication and the cultures and people of today’s society. It gives way for different options in stating sentences or phrases. (Olson). Each affect should change with age. As a person grows older, their writing styles should mature and take on a more professional aspect.

Texting is a fairly new form of communication that has taken the world by storm. It became popular around 2001, and originally had its limitations, such as the 160-character limit. But now that technology has advanced, texting has followed along and is now a convenient, casual, and a more immediate way of communicating. So naturally, texting has evolved also in terms of the language used within it. We see this mostly in the form of abbreviations and short hand spelled words. Some people argue that texting has ruined the English language. Studies and observations have shown that the benefits of texting and cyber speak are much more broad then expected. Textisms have been shown to increase phonology skills, brain activity, creativity and provide a relatable outlet for students in education.