Michele Wanko Case Study

Before she eventually purchased a gun and obtained a license, she had taken some action to prevent this from happening. One action that she took to prevent from having to purchase a firearm was taking a kung fu class, which teaches protective action when someone enters your space without permission. She had the most difficultly convincing herself mentally that she could shoot a person. The sense of safety made her sometimes doubt her ability to ever shoot a person. The article states that “she was against firearms, and local police told us that mace was illegal.” (382). Although she did not like the thought of possessing a firearm, she felt as if it was her last resort.

After being told the details of a supposed getaway car from a robbery, the police saw the car and began to drive after it (Rakas V. Illinois 439 U.S. 128 (1978)). The officers then took off after the car to conduct a search passed on probable cause. After completing the search the officers found a shot gun and shells within the car (Rakas V. Illinois 439 U.S. 128 (1978)). The owner of the vehicle had no correlations to the robbery, so the passengers took responsibility of the gun and ammo (Rakas V. Illinois 439 U.S. 128 (1978)). Upon their court date, the men that were incarcerated decided they wanted to motion to suppress the gun. However due to a lack of standing, the motion to suppress was denied (Rakas V. Illinois 439 U.S. 128 (1978)).

The Model Penal Code for murder in the state of California would be section 197, where is defined as the unlawful killing of a human being with the mental state and aforethought. However, Mr. Zack did not kill Ms. Amber without a mental state of aforethought. In other words, Mr. Zack committed a voluntary manslaughter against her wife, Ms. Amber because as Mr. Zack was coming out work early for the reason, he was ill. However, Mr. Zack saw Ms.Amber Naked and Mr.Dallas Shirtless; Mr. Zack upset that he saw her wife naked and Mr.Dallas shirtless pull out his side gun and shot and kill Ms. Amber. As Result that Ms. Amber died by the gunshot, the Mr.Zack shoot Mr. Zack is responsible for his action. In where Mr. Zack would need to prove her action

Elena Rodriguez was a 33 year old woman living in Cameron Park, Texas. On the day of July 5th, 2011 she thought that all of her seven children were in the house with her, but unfortunately her 3 year old son; Francisco, had snuck out of the house and accidentally locked himself in a van. 2 hours later Elena’s sister found the boy deceased, most likely as a result of being in the hot stuffy van for more than he could handle. Due to losing track of her son too long, Rodriguez was charged with manslaughter. Whether you think that this was the right charge or not, it is a proven fact that this women should not have been charged. It is specifically stated that under common law both the actus reus and mens rea must be present for the act to be considered

The facts in the Chambers case can be applied to the law in the Model Penal Code. To be convicted of second-degree murder, there must be murder, as well as, additional factors such as extreme emotional or unreasonable belief of justifiable homicide. There must be a sudden intense passion resulting from serious provocation, which can be seen in the Chambers case. Chambers plowed through the Oklahoma State University’s homecoming parade after running a red light and striking a police motorcycle. This tragedy occurred half an hour before Chambers was fired from her part-time job at Stillwater’s Freddy’s Frozen Custard and Steakburgers. What Chambers did in the half hour between her release from her employment and the crash remains unclear, however,

In the article, it talks about a Pastor returning home finding out that his wife was shot in the head. She was unresponsive and in the next two days she died in the hospital. Unfortunately, she was pregnant at the time and the child did not make it either. Fortunately, his 15-month son was found in another room safe and unharmed. Throughout the case, many details are discussed about who was involved, explanation towards what happened, description on suspects, and evidence left behind. In my opinion, there were some interesting details discussed in the article including neighbors came forward with surveillance cameras helped the police look more into detail to what exactly happened and to near in on a suspect. Unfortunately, three men were involved in this case with numerous law robbery, theft, sexual assault, and burglary. This case related to the Locard’s Exchange Principle because some DNA was left on Amanda’s sweatshirt. Also, Larry (one of the victims) stated that “after they left, Amanda charged at them making them shot at her.” Regardless, the police stated that Larry said “he leaned over her body, shot her in the back of the head, and watched her bleed.” As noted in the article and most everyday situations, the Locard’s Exchange Principle

Predication: On 05/15/18, Store Manager (SM) Alissa Nemchinsky contacted Asset Protection Manager (APM) Jakub Orlando regarding Beauty Consultant (BC) Yordi Diaz who was suspected of time theft and stealing products from the look boutique.

A man, G, is being charged with attempted murder and assault because G believed he was going to be attacked by four young men demanding money from him on the train. In an alleged attempt to protect his self, G shot each of the four men multiple times. After committing the crime, G ran away from the crime scene. Although G claimed to have been protecting himself, his act was not one of self-defense.

The looting of ancient sites has been an ongoing global issue for many years. Plundered artifacts and antiques results in the devastation of humanity’s past. Archaeologists have pressed government leaders to crack down on this problem and take the steps necessary to prevent it from reoccurring in the future. American space archaeologist Sarah Parcak, winner of the $1 million TED Prize, is investing money to develop a new plan that will protect ancient sites from looting. Parcak plans to create an online program that incorporates the use of satellite imagery and crowd-sourcing to record new archaeologist sites and map looting activity. Her main goal is to eventually “map the entire world,” Parcak said. “You’d have a global alarm system where

Susan Diane Wojcicki was conceived July 5, 1968 in Santa Clara, California. She is the little girl of Esther Wojcicki, a teacher of Russian Jewish drop, and Stanley Wojcicki, a Polish American material science educator at Stanford University. She has 2 sisters named Janet Wojcicki, and Anne Wojcicki. She experienced childhood in the Stanford, California, zone and later examined history and writing at Harvard University 1990, financial matters at the University of California, Santa Cruz 1993 and business at the University of California, Los Angeles 1998. She was an American Tech industry official who was CEO 2014 of the video-sharing website YouTube.

I am aware that she was charged for exceeding the boundaries of self-defense. We discussed what had happened a few months after the incident, and she deeply regretted her actions. She blamed herself for provoking her friend to act violently and for responding to her friend’s actions too impulsively.

We believe that the wife killed him and it would be easier We arrived at the Volupedis home at 1:30 and the wife got home at 1:00. We saw a glass in his hand on the carpet and if he would have tripped then the glass would have been broken. The autopsy that he had a wound on his head. To knock him out with the pan because he was intoxicated and then she started cooking to hide the evidence. To begin with the wife was home for about 20 minutes and then she called the cops. As a rule you call the cops right away when you see someone laying on the ground. Another rule is that the glass would have been broken if we fell down the stairs.Secondly, if her husband would have tripped and fell of the stairs walking down the stairs

Your post is very clear and direct to the point. Although you missed mentioning the 3Cs strategy for persuasive messages that you will be using, I noticed that you used the capture, convince and contact as what stated in our textbook on page 78-79. In your first letter to Sherry Lewski, I think it is really important to let her know about the loans and emphasizing what went wrong. During this situation, I think reassurance is needed to Lewski while working out the issue about the root of the problem. I like the part you convince her and keep your contact with her so you can follow up about it. I will also add to your first letter that Central Financial is competent and has high standards in their business practices and follow up by an apology.

It was an accident. I swear the gun shot itself. I didn’t mean it. It just happended. The police have an idea of what happended. Me. I’m the suspect. I’m the crazy shooter locked away in the physc ward. But i’m inocent. If you are going to belive one thing I say belive that. People are falsly accused all the time. That doesn’t mean their guilty. Some things just happen. Things you can’t explain. Things you can’t stop. Just things.

Wow, that’s a scary situation involving the pistol. I firmly remember a view incidents myself that will forever be planted in my mind. I’ll share one story. I used to go outside and play baseball with my friends out in the street, but with a tennis ball. As stupid kids, we decided to hit a few rocks instead of tennis balls. I stupidly hit the rock and smashed one of the neighbor’s windows. The neighbor was furious about it and started demanding my mother to pay for it. I remember the neighbor yelling at my mother, while my mother was just taking it. My mother wasn’t confrontational. My father pulled up in a car while this was going on. He ran out and threatened the neighbor’s life and gave my mother the “evil” eye which wasn’t a good sign. I saw my mother and father barge in the house and slam the front door.