Microaggression Analysis

In this article the research I collected explains the use of political correctness at a University. The purpose of political correctness is to avoid or take extreme measures to desist any action or expression that may exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against. It is clear that majority of the people in this article are not satisfied by the way issues were handled at the University. The author presented relevant information to answer the question; “Is political correctness an enemy of free speech?”. Some government officials that were brought into this situation, agreed with political correctness and what it means. While doing this research I learned that political correctness in not only this, but also is a tool used to control people's speech so that no one feels offended. I believe political correctness is barricade for anyone who wants a power of choice. Moreover, this article is useful for an analysis on limitations for societies in

However, many groups claim that political correctness in society is justified in its efforts to sanitize offensive material created though years of oppressing minorities. What was originally a noble idea, to remove blatant words of offensive meaning, has turned into an “over the top” effort to rid any words of possible controversy. We are regulating our ways of plain speaking, freedom of choice, and freedom of speech. Laws of restrictions on slander and public decency should be decided on the common law methodology and not by the interests of the liberal “mob”. If plain speaking is not allowed, clear thinking is

Microaggressions manifest in many ways such as, “You’re lucky that you're black”, “Don’t you wish you were white”, and “What are you”. These comments can be very insulting to a person. “Don’t you wish you were white” can be very insulting to an African American or Hispanic person. In other words, this example illustrates that the colored person is viewed down upon since they are not white. An African American is viewed down because they were slaves and since they are not white, whites are seen as rich and powerful. Sometimes a simple insult like, “You’re smart,” can offend a person without you knowing it. When someone says, “You’re smart,” people can start questioning themselves about their abilities and intelligence, but there is a way to respond.

Freedom of speech is a glorious thing and a privileges of living in the United States of America is being able to express one’s opinion. Segments of society are making an effort to stifle people’s opinions to do what is politically correct. Can people’s ideas of protection be too extreme? In the article, “The Coddling of the American Mind”, Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt argue that there is a negative outcome when rules are given to stop people from being offended, and this statement is supported from real life examples, analogies, and reliable sources.

On November 9, it was announced that Donald Trump would be president. This essay isn’t entirely about Donald Trump, but rather about one of the reasons why he was elected: he’s not afraid to “tell it like it is” rather than worry about being politically correct. One of the complaints from the millions of people who voted for Trump is that America is too politically correct, almost to the point that it infringes on free speech. Whether this is true or not is debatable.

The three different categories of microaggressions are judged based on what is used to insinuate a negative or racist message toward a minority. Microassault is defined as “…an explicit racial derogation characterized primarily by a verbal attack meant to hurt the intended victim through name calling, avoidant behavior, or purposeful discriminatory actions”, while microinsults as “…communications that convey rudeness and insensitivity and demean a person’s racial heritage or identity”, and, finally, microinvalidations as “…communications that exclude negate, or nullify the psychological thoughts feelings, or experiential reality of a person of color” (Sue 274). Clear definitions have let the general public be aware of how microaggressions

RACIAL MICROAGGRESSION Racial microaggression wether behavioral, enviromental or verbal which express derogatory and negative insults towards minority groups, people of color and Aferican Americans. In viewing racism from different social physiological literature there is a aversive racism that psycholgists put into a classification of three catogories such as: micro insults, micro assults and cicro invalidation. It appears in different forms and are prone with interracial incidents which are identified in these catagorgies.

These spaces, some have argued, should be free not only of overtly critical language, but also of “microaggressions,” a term coined in the 1970s. Susan Robbins defines microaggressions as “subtle, often unconscious verbal slights or actions that convey derogatory, racist, sexist, homophobic, or other hostile messages conveying inferiority, that become cumulative over time.” Though microaggressions may not be intentional, overt, or part of a pattern, they can have a negative effect on the person or group targeted nonetheless.

The politically correct movement is made

As American people, we know that we are entitled to certain rights according to the constitution; one of which is freedom of speech. In Civility and Its Discontents, Leslie Epstein explores the limits and contradictions of this much cherished right when considering whether he would expel a student who wrote racial slurs in the dorm rooms of a University if it was up to him. He discusses this situation and topics that stem from it in an analytical yet somewhat emotionally involved tone and makes the reader reflect on the wide range of information presented about the issues of political correctness, freedom of speech, expulsion, and racism.

Political correctness has become increasingly obvious in our daily lives. For example, the other day I attended the first meeting of the Frisbee Club here on the State University campus. During the meeting, we were discussing the fact we wanted shirts for this year, but we did not know what slogan to use.

The main idea of this article was talking about how American colleges and universities are sensitizing what is said on campus from faculty plus students. Students want campus’ to be a “safe zone” from words and ideas that are causing discomfort or offending someone. Microagression and trigger warnings are used to help with word choice and how to make statements not bias or offensive. They also warn students of subjects or words that might trigger and emotional response.

Justin Simien once said, "Unfortunately 'post racism ' is also a myth, like unicorns and black people who survives to the end of horror movies." In other words post racism doesn't exist when white people and those of privilege can sit on the backs of hard working Americans especially of color. Where microaggressions such as micro-insult and microinvalidation still occurs at extreme rates especially in educational settings. Young children of color are exposed to high rates of microinvalidation without seeing any forms of it slowing down or stopping. Whether their teacher doesn't think they are smart enough or kids picking at the child because the color of their skin or accent. Students who have never dealt with the "other" tend to pick up their prejudice behavior from their parents and teachers surrounding them, creating a cycle for each generation. Microaggressions has unfortunately shaped my everyday life through the systemic educational system that reinforces white privilege, as well as, male dominance.

Political correctness features prominently within the play. Political correctness was seen as a highly controversial issue in the late 1980s to the early 1990s and was argued within a 1992 essay collection, debating political correctness, that it was “The most important discussion in American education”. This was perhaps due to the numerous amounts of opinions on whether or not political correctness was right. Political correctness repressed people’s abilities to freedom of speech and therefore there were many differing

“Terms such as politically correct thus have a hidden history, uncovering which is dependent both on the accurate recollection of those who were there,” (Cameron, 1995,78).