Microdosing: An Easy Alternative To Animal Testing On Animals

Some people might argue that there is no better alternatives for testing then animals. Over the years, however, science has created many alternatives for animal use in testing. One alternative is, using donated human tissue and organs. With this method less animals will die for human research. This has also been proven to be up to 20% more accurate than an animal testing (Neavs). Another alternative would be microdosing. Microdosing would take human volunteers and give them small doses of drugs high enough to cause an effect but not high enough to affect the entire body (The Hastings Center). By using these alternatives, less animals will be used

There has been a lot of animal testing in the United States and thousands of animals already have been killed. In research and testing, animals are subjected to experiments that can include everything from testing new drugs, poisoning for toxicity testing, burning skin, causing brain damage, implanting electrodes into the brain, maiming, blinding, and other painful and invasive procedures. Animal testing should not be allowed to proceed because millions of animals are getting killed, the results aren't always right, and it is more expensive to test it on animals.

Animal testing has been a controversial topic for many generations throughout the world. People against animal testing say that animal testing is cruel and inhumane and

Every year 100 million mice, 241,000 bunnies, 125,000 monkeys, 75,000 dogs, and 22,000 cats are killed from animal testing, according to

Experts who have studied this issue have found that each year, more than 100 million animals such as mice, rats, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, and birds are killed in U.S. labs for medical training, curiosity for experimentation, and drug, food, chemical, and cosmetics testing. The issue has remained for hundreds to thousands of years (estimated since 500 BC), and although it is a huge issue, it still hasn't been dealt with.

The very first reason why animal testing should be banned is elementary: it is cruel and unnecessary. Approximately 17-22 million animals are used for testing each year in the United States. Substances are injected into the animal, chemicals are force-fed, irritants are rubbed into the eyes and

Imagine this, you and a big group of people are stuck in the desert and there's no water in sight.You send a young man to look for water in the burning hot sun.He finds a lifesaving amount of water miles from everyone else .Then he brings it back to the people saving their lives but risking his own.Even though the man's life was risked, you saved more people than you hurt.This is what animal testing does.Animal testing saves thousands of lives every single day.

¨Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisioned and abused in US labs every year¨ (¨11 Facts About Animal Testing¨). Imagine if that was someones animal getting tortured in labs just to test things such as beauty products and perfume. Animal testing was first suggested when, ¨Charles Darwin evolutionary theory in the mid 1850s also served to suggest that animals could serve as effective models to facilitate biological understanding in humans¨ (Murnaghan). But, ¨the enormous breakout came in 1922 when animal testing allowed for insulin¨ (Murnaghan). Animal testing should be banned because it is inhumane, most of the testing on animals does not benefit humans, and animals bodies work differently than humans.

frogs, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, guinea pigs, monkeys, monkeys, fish, and birds, are killed in U.S. laboratories for biology lessons, medical training, curiosity- driven experimentation, and chemical drug, food, and cosmetic testing” (Peta 1). Animals have been used repeatedly throughout the history of biomedical research. Early Greek physician-scientists such as Aristotle and Erasistratus, performed experiments on living animals. Every day, animals all over the world are killed in laboratories for testing. Although there is a rising number of activists fighting against animal testing and abuse, there are still an excessive amount of animals being

To begin with, animal experimentation provides unreliable test results because of the differences between animals and humans. In the article, Animal Testing is Not Essential for Medical Research, Ray C. Greek and Jean Swingle Greek said,”More than half of the medications released between 1976 and 1985 were taken off the market or relabeled because dangerous side effects were discovered that had not been found in animal experiments.” Many drugs have been found to have unpredicted side effects so testing on animals just shows researchers what the drug would do to animals, not humans. Since the point of animal testing is to test the effectiveness and results of a drug, it

A couple methods for replacing animal experimentation are in vitro technology which is based on human cell and tissue cultures and in silico technology, also known as computer modeling. In vitro testing uses only samples of blood, cells, or tissue donated from a patient and from there, researchers can find results, diagnostics, basically most of the information they would need. In silico technology, however, is a little different. In silico testing takes place on a computer model. These computer models simulate human biology and and the progression of developing diseases. Studies show that these models can accurately predict the ways that new drugs will react in the human body and replace the use of animals in many standard drug tests. Also, QSARs are computer-based

Many lives of animals are being used for the sake of testing, these species do not belong in laboratories, locked in a small cage or on a table with needles stuck into them. Animal testing is a phrase referred to a group of founders preforming on alive animals for many purposes of studies to find potency of new medical profits. According to Ian Murnaghsan, (2016). All performers, even the ones that are restricted as delicate, have the ability to cause the animal feel agenizing pain and suffering. Because of the amount of pain they put the animals under, they are most likely to end up getting killed or die from the unbearable abuse. There is a different amount of animals that get used for animal testing, but mostly mice, monkeys, and pigs. Shockingly,

Each year over 100 million animals gets killed by animal testing. According to Humane Society International, animals usually get force fed, forced inhalation, and food and water depriving.

Imagine a world full of disease and sickness, and doctors frantically trying to cure it, but do not want to injure or kill anyone in the process. Without animal testing it would be extremely difficult to find cures to cancers, diabetes, allergies, and other horrible problems. Animal testing is a critical tool in science and it cannot be replaced, it helps cure very serious and dangerous diseases, it’s very important when it comes to human health, and should be continued.

Animal testing refers to procedures that take place in human clinical trials and it involves dosing, toxicity and efficiency of drugs. “ Humans beings have long used animals as test subjects for a variety of purposes.” (“Animal”) which violates the living rights of animals. Animals and people are alike in many ways, as close relatives we both feel, think , behave and experience pain therefore animals should be treated with the same value and respect as humans. Animal testing is inhumane and it contradicts the rights of life of an animal, thus animal testing should not be morally justified.