Microfinance : An Emerging Important Financial Factor

In both developing and emerging economies, microfinance has vastly and increasingly been seen as one of the most important means for enhancing the lives of the poor and therefore a major tool for economic and social development mostly in rural areas. Lately, contrary to this widespread belief, critics have raised eyebrows against this growing popularity of microfinance as a major tool for enhancing economic development. Contrary to belief, they are of the opinion that microfinance is a ‘make-belief’ that is hindering economic and social development rather than enhancing it.

The book, Microfinance and its Discontent: Women in Debt in Bangladesh written by Lamia Karim, gives us account on what causes a culture to be known as “economy of shame” status, such as in the case of Bangladesh. She writes on a subject that is a top list priority in the economical world these days, the corrupt ways NGO’s lenders do business not only in Bangladesh but across the world, however, she centralizes her views on Bangladesh and only a handful of NGO’s. Even though this was primarily a look at Bangladesh, it has resulted in capturing the attention of people across the globe not only with the NGO’s mention in the book but resulting in a closer look at all NGO’s and how they serve the people. Karim shares with the readers how the 1980’s nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) led in the way of microfinance institutions and claimed that they were providing women with an empowerment tool by issuing them loans. We find that over 80% of borrows are women and most are economically challenged already. With that being stated Karim also takes a look at how and why that is, she discusses the long term effects it is having on women and how it is furthering the exploitation of women in Bangladesh. She looked at how this type of exploitation has not only weakened further women’s economy in Bangladesh but has also strengthen the power NGO’s have over the people (mainly women) at the same time. It takes a look at this type of expansion and brands NGO’s use as a “shadow state

Microfinancing produces many benefits for poverty stricken, or low- income households. One of the benefits is that it is very accessible. Banks today simply won’t extend loans to those with little to no assets, and generally don’t engage in small size loans typically associated with microfinancing. Through microfinancing small loans are produced and accessible. Microfinancing is based on the philosophy that even small amounts of credit can help end the cycle of poverty. Another benefit produced from the microfinancing initiative is that it presents opportunities, such as extending education and jobs. Families receiving microfinancing are less likely to pull their children out of school for economic reasons. As well, in relation to employment,

Women in developing countries are heavily empowered by micro-loans. These women normally aren’t able to provide income for their family because of a lack of education due to low funds. On top of that, husbands are considered the money makers of the family, while women are expected to stay home and tend to their house and children. But micro-loans change all of this, as it gives women the power to start their own businesses. In full, micro-loans are very influential, and can help with women that struggle, and assist them in making more money.

In this documentary, Tom Heinemann (the director) provides a sharp critique of microfinance in the world. The documentary pertains critically to the work of Muhammad Yunus and the Grameen Bank in Bangladesh. Tom Heinemann tells an unpopular and confronting story about how microfinance, although innovative, leaves few to prosper and the many poor being financially “strapped”. This documentary has caused a flood of criticism about microfinance, while diminishing the reputation of Grameen Bank’s founder, Muhammad Yunus. I feel that The Micro Debt does not shed the full light onto microfinance, yet it is becoming increasingly hard to ignore its effects.

“Microcredit is about giving hope” Natalie Portman, (Natalie Portman Quote). Microcredit or microfinance, is the lending of small amounts of money at low interest to new businesses in the developing world, (David Siegel). People argue that microcredit I ineffective. But others disagree and say it’s the best way to win the fight against global poverty. Microcredit is an effective way to fight poverty because it’s easy to obtain, provides stability, and helps people build a new path for themselves.

While the spread of microcredit as a development practice has enabled borrowers in many developing countries to access credit, not all experiences with microcredit have been positive. The original model of microcredit lending was not effective in alleviating poverty. To remedy this, an “improved” lending model was introduced; however, this model, too, has failed the impoverished citizens of the developing world because of its exclusivity. Traditional microcredit loaning systems require some form of material collateral to ensure that a borrower will repay their loan. This excludes the ultra-poor due to their lack of possessions to use as collateral (Schurmann and Johnston 2009, 521). To solve this issue and provide the poorest citizens with

Almost half of the world lives on less than $2.50. At least 80% of humanity lives on less than $10 a day. According to UNICEF, 22,000 children die each day due to poverty. Poverty is an ever-present issue that affects the lives of billions of people each day. There are many government subsidies that come into impoverished areas, but does money solve the issue of poverty? No, money alone cannot solve the world’s issue of poverty. In this paper, I want to discuss the role of microfinance in the developing world. Microfinance can be done poorly, which will continue to stunt the economic growth of an area, but if done properly microfinance can being human flourishment to a developing area. In order to take a closer look into microfinance, I will highlight the efforts that Kiva, an online lending company, has done to improve the economic horizon for many areas of the world.

Although micro lenders and conventional lenders both lend money, their motives differ greatly. Under the terms of micro lending, the main goal is to enhance the

Studies of the impact of microfinance in more than 24 countries have found high improvements in household income levels (Carr, 2002). Access to microfinance allows the borrower to reduce costs with lower interest rates and purchasing of raw materials. Income increases as the number of goods or services offered grows and product costs are reduced. Microcredit was initially created in developing countries where extreme poverty percentages are higher, but it also helps developed countries in a significant way. Even though the United States is one of the world’s greatest economies, microcredit helps micro businesses to develop effective financial plans and have an individual as well as collective growth.

Microfinance institutions (MFI) have created intense debates in an industry of traditional banking. Being primarily focused on mission of poverty reduction through economic stimulation of low income areas, MFI have sharpened the credit policy to specification of area of interests. The major distinction is loan interest rate being notably higher in comparison to profit orientated financial institutions (Rosenberg et al. 2009). The reason roots in excessive cost of funds and administrative loses faced by growing industry. As noted in Cull et.al (2009), interest paid by borrowers represents the struggle of MFI to overcome the burden of expenses and achieve financial sustainability. The latter however, can be reached by altering the capital structure of MFI through diversification of source of funding or rejection of capital which can lead to malfunction. As soon as the changes are implemented, institutions can proceed to expansion reaching increasing return to scale and beneficially affecting sustainability. This essay would focus on the role on subsidies in performance of MFI. The rationale behind exploring this form of noncommercial capital is that total amount of subsidized capital in MFI reached almost 16 billion in 2009 (Bloomberg, 2012) posing a question regarding the alternative and probably more efficient use of respective funds to support poor. The second reason derives from the number of researches discussed later,

In reality, it is generally perceived that small scale fund plans have met constrained triumphs. The capacity of a lady to change her life through access to money related administrations relies on upon her individual circumstance, capacities, environment and the status of ladies as a gathering. Control of capital is one and only measurement of an intricate procedure of strengthening. Tragically, advantages of smaller scale credit are undermined by inconveniences confronted by ladies in getting to data, informal communities, and different assets they have to prevail in business. An investigation of the effect of miniaturized scale credit plots in Bangledesh uncovered consequences of just 21% of respondents getting to be enabled. Out of financial variables investigated, they inferred that ladies institutional cooperation, media presentation and family arrive property were the more critical necessities for ladies strengthening than accessibility of credit. A few faultfinders have contended that the greater part of microfinance projects are organized so as to have their most noteworthy effect in helping ladies perform conventional parts better. They contend that by accentuating the advantages that ladies' families get from their entrance to credit and ensuring this does not meddle altogether with their customary obligations, microfinance foundations may strengthen conventional sex parts as opposed to change

The Microcredit Foundation of India is a non- profit organization, and effective tool for alleviating poverty. The Microcredit Foundation has its base located in southern rural India. Microcredit works with just about everyone who needs their help; however their focus is women. Microcredit presents the women of rural communities with the opportunity to start a business. The services of micro credit are dedicated to creating a better stable economy, opportunities in the establishment of medium sized enterprises, and co-operative development. The Microcredit Foundation of India provides sufficient and affordable customer oriented funding and other financial services as well as consulting and training to the target groups. Microcredit also

What is microlending? In simplest terms microlending is the lending of very small amounts of money at low interest, to low income people in urban and rural areas. It started forty years ago, when a person named Muhammad Yunus was visiting his family and his country Bangladesh which had recently become an independent country. Muhammad Yunus had left his home country then –East Bengal- when he was a child with his parents in search of a better future. He graduated from Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tennessee, with a PhD in economics. Muhammad Yunus is the founder of Grameen Bank, the first non-profit organization to offer microfinance services in Bangladesh and in the world (New York Times). This bank showed the world on how little

This critical analysis is done on journal study titled “Microcredit in Rural Bangladesh: Is It Reaching the Poorest?” which was published by the Journal of ESR. The analysis was performed with the aim of understanding the why the microcredit programs reached rarely to poorest of the poor in rural Bangladesh. They found five reason behind this: supply, demand, NGDO’s norms and social issues, sustainable financial services and voluntary and non-voluntary dropouts. This paper also argues that microcredit is the not best way to help the poorest of the poor. This paper used two kind of primary data of source, firstly they conducted study in 1999 by World Bank as a part of study titled “Voices of the Poor”. It was organized in 8 rural and 2 urban cities of Bangladesh. (Nabi et. al., 1999) and the second study done in 2 rural and 5 urban cities of Bangladesh from the 1999 to 2000 and the title was “Listening to the Poor”. They utilized different method for finding result of not reaching microcredit facilities to poorest of the poor. This article was published in 2004 and mainly focus on financial capital to likely stimulate growth of poor in rural Bangladesh. And the author of Dr. Dipankar Datta is an advisor of concern worldwide. (Datta, D. 2004)