Middle Class Family Research Paper

Unlike the Upper-class people, the middle-class people spent a lot of their leisure time browsing or reading through mass-circulation magazines, newspapers or this era’s outpouring fiction novels. Middle-class men and women also joined a variety of social and professional organizations to deal with a lot of problems that were arising during the industrialization. Such as the American Red Cross that provided disaster relief; the National Association of Colored Women defended and helped relieve suffering for colored women; etc. The consumer culture of this era increased a woman’s domestic workload by giving them more to buy and more to clean, prepare and keep up with. These middle-class women who were expected to stay home and care for the house and children were one of the highest in the chain of consumers. Department stores, chain stores, ready-made clothes, and packaged goods competed for the money and loyalty of female consumers. Hairdressers, cosmetic companies, and department stores offered a growing and ever-changing assortment of styles. These new products and technologies improved the middle-class quality of life. Unfortunately, the benefits of this consumption were not shared with the industrial workers and the farmers as they worked long hours in dangerous conditions for very low

In the 19th century, the Market Revolution was created, resulting significance in American history by redefining the roles for genders, especially for women. During this time, factories began to appear changing the nature of work for men and women. Although, women were employed cheaper because at the time in Colonial America, men were considered superior to women, even in terms of morality. Some women worked effectively by applying their strength of factories, while other women adapted to a private lifestyle avoiding conflicts in the market economy. However, the privileges were determined based on a family’s class status, which were middle and upper classmen that gave a higher advantage than those who were poor. Those who were married had no

As the roaring twenties captivated the lives of American families with its great profits, big business, and optimism, the thirties altered the nation’s economic dreams, values, fashion, and everyday life. After ending an abundant decade in the twenties, the 1930’s brought forth pain, poverty, and hardships.

During the Industrial Revolution, women were, in general, considered socially inferior. A “good woman” was expected to stay at home, raise

Early in the 1800’s the father was the head of the household and this included the children. Nurturing was not in consideration but needing help with labor and the farm was a necessity. Children were viewed as property and and had very little rights. In the 1800’s, Caroline Norton, who just recently divorced and was deprived of her children, began to work feverishly for women to have

Changes in the economy contributed to changed ideas about class, gender, and family. The ideas of “republican motherhood” that had been prevalent following the American Revolution, gave way to the “cult of domesticity”. Women were expected to remain in the household and were relegated to second-class citizens. Additionally, children in urban households were much more likely to leave the family in search of work than they had been in the rural world. This was because of the shift of income-earning work out of the home.

Women and children did not have equal rights as men, but they proved to be prosperous in the eighteenth-century. The household economy supposed that family was the center of economic life. They believed that most labor revolved around the household and that all family members should assist to the family’s income. Both genders were seen equally in the eighteenth-century. The independent family farms relied on the labor of children and women. If the labor was not being performed the farm would receive no income. Farmers focused on owning enough land so they could pass it along to their sons. The death rate decreased and population increased because marriages became lifelong commitments. All families had one goal and that was to maintain the farm

The Brady Bunch were the ideal families in the 1960's and 1970's, and in the 80's, it was Family Ties. When the 1990's approached us, television shows took on a whole new outlook on American Families. There were shows such as Full House, which was about a single father raising three daughters with the help of his brother-in-law and his best friend. Roseanne was also another show that showed the "dysfunctional" side of families. American Families keep changing, and they will continue to change in our future.

This paper will discuss the differences between families from the 1960’s and the families of today. There are many differences between the different times. I have focused on the parentage portion of the families. I explained what the ideal family is and how it is different today. I’ve also included ways that will help these families of today become stronger as a family.

Family relations started to weaken during the second revolution in America and New England because with new employment opportunities for women, men and children in New England and America, families had the ability to become free or separate from each other, move away, or have an employment in which their gender or age might not have otherwise allowed today. “In short, the Industrial Revolution in early America created a standard of hard work, individuality, and in some cases, an equal amount of importance dedicated to career and family.”

Running a family and looking after children was an "all day" work. It normally included cleaning, planning and cooking the dinners, canning and packaging the homestead create, and accommodating all needs of the spouse and youngsters. According to the article, Roles and Education: Changing Traditions in Population Planning, Vaughn states “Kids were instructed their parts when exceptionally youthful. Young men were demonstrated to cultivate and accommodate in their future families ' needs. They went to class where they were educated the fundamentals alongside being acquainted with profession choices. Advanced education was accessible.” Young ladies figured

The American family is shaped by the economic stratification of society and the opportunities afforded to each social class. Lareau and Cherlin discussed that the typical family encounters economic inequality that overtly affects individuals within households. Lareau has successfully conducted research and illustrated that different experiences vary among the middle class and lower class families by observing the daily life of children. The economy of the United States provides privilege for middle class families and constrains resources for those in the working-lower class.

Before the Industrial Revolution, there were many hard times for families. All of this changed when the Industrial Revolution happened. Women

In the early years of my grandparents’ growing families, both my grandmothers stayed home as homemakers to take care of their children while my grandfathers worked on the farm. I noticed that later, both my grandmothers began to work outside of the home to contribute to the financial needs of the family. The change in their work can be attributed to the both the social and economic changes that took place (Niles & Harris-Bowlsbey, 2013). Since then, the women in my family have worked full-time, including myself. The men in the family have done work in business since both my grandfathers did so. My father and my brothers have definitely followed their example in that

Foremost, the familial image has undertaken significant changes in regards to the ‘breadwinner’ and ‘homemaker’ roles within the family. In the latter of the 20th century, women’s participation in the labour force had been very little to non-existent, primarily because time allocations had been perceived as gender specific, that is, men were seen as the ‘breadwinner’, while women were viewed as the ‘homemaker’ (Seltzer, Bachrach, Bianchi, Bledsoe, Casper, Chase-Lansdale, Diprete, Hotz, Morgan, Sanders, & Thomas, 2005, pp.20). The ‘breadwinner’ role was to secure financial stability, while the