Migrant Crisis Essay

Since 1950 European Union (EU) was created it has promoted peace, prosperity and values among the member nations and its neighbouring countries. EU’s influential tools, has helped transform many European states into functioning democracies and prosperous countries. EU’s membership has grown from 6 to 28 countries (Enlargement, 2014), satisfying a historic vow to integrate the continent bringing in most states of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) by peaceful ideals.EU has anticipated the enlargement as an extraordinary opportunity to endorse political strength and economic success in Europe. EU’s extension policy is open to any European state that fulfils the EU’s political and financial criteria for membership; still the political process of inclusion of new state requires a unanimous agreement from all the existing 28 member states. Europe is considered to be more flourishing and safer place due to the promotion of democracy, anti-corruption policy and the single market policy.

The European Union was created on the notion of peace and prosperity. But has it really lived up to its promise? Tensions are brewing. Maybe it’s time to leave the EU once and for all. The EU originated after the Second World War, with only a few countries within it, but it has grown over many years and now has twenty-eight different countries. They share a national anthem that binds them through the power of music. The EU now presents more disadvantages than advantages, the countries participating have their cultural diversity being limited, their own countries laws are being superseded by those of the EU, and their economy’s are too dependent on one another.

The heated domestic debates in established member states on new member accession exposes gaps in social consensus about new member accession in the EU. Broadly, social consensus in decision-making implies that minority and majority opinions are taken into account. The alienation of a minority group(s) in decision-making is often utilized by political rivals to spark a political backlash that can hurt the reputation of a politician or jeopardize the future of the dominant party or government. Since politicians are keenly aware of this possibility, they strategically establish options they prefer among competing

Mudde and the School of North Carolina (2011) argue that party politics traditions, especially the division between parties and their position towards European integration are at the core of Eurosceptic sentiments. The Sussex School puts forward evidences that the reasons are linked to nation-specific characteristics such as the electoral system, the structure of the party-system, etc. Even though there is no interaction between the two schools, recent research shows that both approach are concomitant (Vasilopoulou

“If the Euro fails, then not only the currency fails… Europe will fail, and, with it, the idea of European unity.” Merkel’s words preclude the diminishing consensus within European Union, no matter the attempts to solidify support within Europe. The 2008 Eurozone crisis has lead to distrust and unease in Europe. The Treaty of Lisbon (2009) was the re-organisation of the European Union policy-making structure after the pillar formation of the Treaty of Maastricht (1993). The Treaty of Lisbon, no matter how triumphantly proclaimed to the people, has given increasing control to the European Parliament and other intergovernmental bodies, and less in the hands of the states or the people. This, coupled with dissatisfaction of the EU and an

The European Union is faced with its impending decline, which has accelerated in recent weeks with anxieties regarding the British referendum, which is becoming a primary concern on the continent. A possible “Brexit” could possibly lead to the fifth largest economy in the world and the second largest economy in the Eurozone from leaving the European Union (E.U). The “Brexit” is the most contested issue both within the United Kingdom (U.K) and the European continent. In the wake of a rampant security and refugee crises in Europe, Europe’s need to keep an economically strong member of the E.U in the organization, is needed to combat the difficulties the continent is facing, particularly the Mediterranean members of the E.U. These

The central aim of this paper is to begin closing that gap by examining EU policy in terms of its agenda setting characteristics. To do this, I explore a theory of punctuated equilibrium, based on the emergence and recession of policy issues from the transnational policy agenda. Defining the current equilibrium and how it is punctuated is one goal of this paper. Also, examining what forces drive the punctuated equilibrium, that is, under what conditions it occurs will help in understanding how we might

The European Union (EU) is not a typical international organization. The mix of intergovernmental and supranational institutions makes the EU a unique, distinctive political, and economic system. As Europe has spiraled from one crisis to the next, difficult discussions haves arisen about how much more power should be delegated to Brussels. Even though the EU advocates for “ever closer union”, through increased integration, states are becoming hesitant to relinquish power to the EU. This is due to the fact that state sovereignty has become threatened; it is being compromised by a combination of the lack of effective democratic institutions and the loss of states have lost control of law-making to legislation power to EU institutions. Euroenthuthiasts argue that state sovereignty is enhanced, not threatened, by reallocating power to EU institutions. However, Eurosceptics dispute that too much control has seceded to the EU making is a threat to state sovereignty. My position aligns with Eurosceptics, for the EU has weakened state sovereignty do to increased centralization of power in EU institutions that lack legitimacy. The European Project has obtained a copious amount of jurisdiction from states and eroded a basic fundamental freedom of the modern state- sovereignty. Since the EU has with goals to deepen and widen integration it’s clear that forfeiting state sovereignty will only intensify. My essay will start with a brief history of the European Union and a short

The purpose of this research is to discover the main challenges facing the EU in the near future, by showing the economic and legal problems that the EU will face. These problems include how migration, bailouts and terrorism affect the EU economically. Furthermore it will look at anti-EU sentiments around Europe, which has appeared to spread across rapidly, due to Euro Crises. Moreover, the Legal problems that the EU will face, such as: the process of obtaining EU citizenship enabling migration and cultural clashes, whilst also looking at the statute that enables free movement of goods and people, resulting in mass immigration and the European Convention on Human Rights. This paper will evaluate EU principles that affect the UK constitution, such as the European Convention on Human Rights, the Costa v ENEL (1964) CMLR 425 case being evidence proving that the EU will face challenges concerning its law being more superior than national law, Van Gend en loos (1963) ECR 1. Where a similar principle was set and the “two-speed Europe”, which, is the idea that different member states should integrate at different levels, as it is believed that the more member states in the EU the harder it is to find a consensus amongst difficult agendas, making the EU law very inconsistent. It will be related it back to the question of ‘what are the main challenges facing the EU in the near future?’

The first possible scenario in the next decade is a daring rise toward much closer integration. This scenario is probably the most desirable but also the most elusive one. In this scenario, France and Germany will take the leap forward and lead the group towards fiscal and political union. Countries in the region will reduce their debt and liberalize their labor markets allowing free movement of workers between borders. The European Central Bank will supervise the other central national banks carefully and harmonize the tax systems of the entire union. In this first scenario, the economic, security and demographic drivers are the most important.

After the Second World War ended, European politicians and citizens had a vision to make Europe’s future certain that a conflict of such magnitude would never arise again in fear of a new extreme nationalistic regime would appear once more. In 1952 progress was made by the establishment of the European coal and steel society and by 1957 the European economic union was created. Foundation for the Europe we live in now came after the treaty of Maastricht which was signed in 1993. Two decades on and the EU has become the largest political and economic union of the modern world, with a total population of over 500 million and is now the second largest economy of the world, behind only the US. First attempt for UK to become a member of the customs union was in 1961 which was unsuccessful and was vetoed, in 1963, by the French president Charles de Gaulle because he argued that the Brits did not share the same vision for European integration as the other member states. However, ten years on in 1973 the UK was successful in becoming a member along with Ireland and Denmark. Nevertheless, ever since the UK became a member, it has been a complicated and intense relationship between the UK government and main European bodies. Eurosceptics argue that things have dramatically changed in the last 40 years and the UK is no longer dependant on Europe to prosper.

After the end of World War II in 1945, there was a motivation to promote and create unity between France and Germany to avoid future conflicts between these two powerful countries. It was this incentive that helped to shape and establish the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) back in 1951 and was also the foundation of the current European Union (EU) as we know it. Only two decades after its creation, the EU faces a very critical and somber moment in history. In recent years, the European Union has been challenged by a series of problems and crisis including slow economic growth and recession, the Greek debt crisis; the Ukrainian crisis, the ongoing migration and refugee crisis, the upcoming UK

Instances of the increase of power of the EU’s institutions are diverse. For instance, the EU has rendered the unanimity that member

Established in 1887, the European Union (EU) was initially created as a means to protect and defend peace and facilitate economic recovery after the end of World War Two throughout the six original members states; France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, Belgium and the Netherlands. Since its conception, the EU has become a significant player in the global arena, economically, politically and also in the form of humanitarian and environmental aid and assistance around the world, currently providing 60% of the worlds development assistance ( Michel, 2007, pg. 23). The question of whether the European union is a significant global actor however, needs firstly to take into consideration the very definition of the European Union as a global entity, and also the definition of the area of ‘actorness’. Once clarified, this essay will argue that the EU’s global presence, capability as an institution in international politics and its future opportunity all demonstrate the EU’s capabilities as a significant global actor in the global political arena.

European Union was formed with a lot of expectations. Despite closeness and similarities, the various nations of the European continent fought bitter wars for thousands of years within themselves. After the devastating World War II, finally everyone saw the light and decided to give a chance to peaceful coexistence. However, EU’s path hasn’t exactly been a bed of roses. Especially of late, too many critical problems have emerged, making some to question its very existence.