Migrant Diaspora and Economic Development

The Great Migration brought about a massive redistribution of the African American population throughout the United States. It transformed black ways of life, art, and institutions, as well as the demographics and cultures of many American cities.

Thomas Jefferson believed that expanding westward was the key to a healthy nation. Forty percent of the population lived in trans -Appalachian west. Most people had left their homes from the East for a economic opportunity.

The nature of western migration was good and bad. With out western migration America wouldn’t be what it is now. But if we had found a different way to deal with the Indians it could have happened with less blood shed. We could have upheld our part of the treats with the Indians. We could have found a way to live with them instead of kicking them out. Then we would have been able to use the knowledge they have since they lived there for so long. But the increase in western migration kicked the indians out of their land.

(Legrain) With introduction of new peoples come new ideas, cultural experiences, and skills that can all be used to benefit our country. High skilled people from other countries could help American companies develop new drugs, technologies, appliances and even new architectural ideas.” Twenty-one of Britain’s Nobel-prize winners arrived in the country as refugees.” (Legrain) The foreigners with new ideas could spark the next big American innovation with their different ways of thinking and perspective. Since they are new to our country they see differently than we do, and can have a completely different view on things. This cultural diversity can also transform little towns into cities with the new people inhabiting them. The immigrants could bring in their cultures and help build our towns into culturally diverse cities that would maybe attract tourists and new residents.

The global mobility of human resources between countries is a key driving force of the currently ongoing economic and regional development all over the world. It is indisputable that the immigration of international labour force would exert many positive and important impacts on the economic, cultural and social structure of both migrant-receiving and migrant-sending countries. Actually, the trend of temporary and permanent immigrants increasing in some western countries began to gain momentum in recent years. Organization for Economic Cooperation Development (OECD 2004) reports indicated that there were more than 1 million new immigrants in the United States in 2001 and 2002, increased by 25% from 2000; in some European countries

offer skills that are very scarce in the country, they will bring about various advantages . People immigrated to

Since the United States 'founding, Immigration is a difficult problem all the time. From 2010 to 2013 there are 3 million people remove to America. Immigrants have been a mainstream social group in America when immigrants transfer to America; they keep the same dream of freedom and hope. Immigration's positive effect is more than the adverse effect. The economy is one of the most important element to judge the country's power. Immigrants made a significant contribution to the American economy, although, most of the natives consider that the immigrants and refugees' ever-increasing population will cause great problems in the future, and a part of people that immigrants have taken their jobs and opportunities. On the contrary, immigrants promoted

While it may be true Mexican skills can be utilized to their fullest potential somewhere else, maybe even on a country with the same language, that country may not only be far away, but also harder to get to. They not only take into account where their skill will be better utilized, but also family reunification. As Massey explained the Economic of labor migration theory; where a decision is made by multiple family members rather than one. Immigrants many of the times seek family reunification. For example, if a person decides to immigrate to another country, it would be easier to seek the country where he has family assistance. If they have family members, or even members of their community on the US, rather than South America, it is more

The benefits of a high immigrant population are apparent in almost every walk of life. Their overall contribution to the general economy is show as a positive one and there improvements to the quality of the workforce are also quite note-worthy.

Thank you for your input. However, I disagree with you first statement. By allowing immigrants and refugees into the United States, this is not going to put a huge threat on our nation’s population. There are currently 326 million (roughly) people living in America. With this in mind, an extra one million is not going to tip the scale so drastically that this would become a “risk”. In addition to this, the people living in America have migrated from across the globe. You argue that our American ideology and culture may be threatened by immigrants, but in what way particularly? The only true natives are American Indians, but even their culture has not been fully assimilated or accepted in United States today. Because people come from different

This article is very helpful as far as the topic of immigration is concerned. It helps look at the issue of immigration from both positive and negative. For example the article shows that having immigrants in a nation will help increase the number of technocrats in that nation. In addition to this, immigration also in provision of labor incase a nation has insufficient labor. The audience of this article is different governments. This article helpsavoid the negative perceptions that people have towards immigration.

On the contrary, the country developed where the immigrant decides emigrate has various consequences, one of there can be increased economy by the force of work additional that the immigrants offers, another one can be an increase of the unemployment in the country and the other can be an increase of the violence as consequence of the excess of immigration. At the same time, the immigration inevitably causes family separation which can lead to the destruction of the family unit; as a result, the society of the both countries can be affected in a negative

In this respect, it is worthy of mention that such a situation with the migration is the result of the recent trend in the world economy which is characterized by processes which are generally called globalization. The process of globalization is overwhelming and involves practically all countries of the world with rare exceptions which

Refugee issue is a global issue mainly due to wars, conflicts or environmental, political, religious and racial reasons (Gibney & Gil, 2010). In recent years, the turmoil triggered by the "Arab Spring" in many countries in West Asia and North Africa causing numerous refugees, so it has once again attracted the attention of people（Grossman, 2017）. People forced to relocate their homes and even renounce their nationality by war or natural disasters are defined as refugee（UNHCR，2017）.The influx of refugees brings cheap labor forces reducing the cost of productions ,and causes the promotion of economic development. In addition, the increasing population leads to an increase in demand which can increase the income of the host countries and the state tax. It can be argued that refugees are unable to benefit the host nations because refugees increase unemployment rate and occupy resources in education. Although it may be true that there are some negative effects caused by refugees, refugees can benefit the host nation in terms of economy and social advancement.

In the Second Edition of Servants of Globalization: Migration and Domestic Work, Rhacel Parreñas examines all of the challenging aspects of the lives of migrant Filipino domestic workers. Throughout the interviews that are included in this novel, the author was able to analyze different cases filled with personal struggle and familial support using the perspectives of many determined women across the diaspora, mainly focusing on those to travel to work in Western Countries. In this paper, I will briefly summarize the first three chapters, bringing to light the most important aspects the Parreñas included. I will then discuss the methodology used in her convincing global ethnography, before I include both the advantages and disadvantages to