Migration Within a Country's Borders Have Greater Negative Impacts at Their Origin Than Their Destination

Migration policies are often designed with the sole objective of influencing international migration by either restricting or encouraging circular migration, immigration or emigration(Ripsman & Paul, 2010). Open border policies have contributed to the uncontrolled to the flow of illegal immigrants into countries and in turn generating challenges to the host countries. The fundamental basis for arguments has been whether open immigration policy or restricted immigration policy

2.) A. Why do people leave some countries and migrate to other countries around the world? What kinds of issues, both positive and negative, result from such movements? For example, why do governments place restrictions on immigration? Provide an example of immigration restrictions that the United States has implemented in the last five years. Research and summarize an immigration restriction imposed by another nation.

Migration is not a new phenomenon throughout the history of human, but the issue of migration has become more of a problem since the emerging of modern states. The distinction between immigrants and local citizens has become official with the emergence of nation-state authority and the ideas of sovereignty, citizenship and nationality. From the 19th century, the control of passport and visa has made the borders between immigrants and citizens even clearer and more identified. Today, as there are more restrictions on entering a country, states have to deal with regulating policies for immigration to control the influx of people

And interesting fact that she shares, a use of the appeal guilt by association, is workers usually send back their income or wages to provide for their families back home. Lastly, she examines some cons of having open borders and her main points are from the “Center for Immigration Studies”. They believe that national security is threaten when the borders are open, because it can lead to a dangerous world full of unknowns. Also, they believe that large amounts of migration can cause demographic changes that cause shifts in the countries political power.

To begin it is helpful to understand that the word “migrant” is a rather contested concept, one that changes over time, and varies depending on the criteria used to assign it.(Raghuram & Erel, 2014, p.133)

From the micro-level to the macro-level globalization has transformed the world into a smaller place with constant interactions occurring at every moment between nations, institutions, groups, and individuals. And with this prevalent interconnectivity, migration between the Global North and the Global South has been a controversial consequence of this global integration (Hinojosa, 2015). For this reason one cannot ignore the importance and impact of migrant populations in the country they settle in, and in the countries of origin.

In summary, I would concede that immigration exist negative effects. Despite that, I think that the positive influence of the immigration is more than its disadvantage. For instance, the economy of American mainly is based on high technology, because the most outstanding people who come from different countries make a great contribution on high technology. Moreover low skill immigration also makes contributions on cleaning, cooking, and waiter services. They buy food, clothes, house, which also promote the development of the economy.

1. The impact is that people who migrate bring money back to the village. Along with the money they also bring new cultural ideas and myths about the places they’ve traveled.

While, developed countries may pull migrants, because of economic opportunities. The rapid urbanization can have adverse impacts on the country, such as environmental and social impacts. Furthermore, the rapid urbanization will result in a demographic shift, which can cause human capital fight. The United States Census Bureau (2015) stated migrant’s population hit a record of 42.1 million in the second half of 2015, an increase of 1.7 million in the same quarter of 2014.

In this respect, it is worthy of mention that such a situation with the migration is the result of the recent trend in the world economy which is characterized by processes which are generally called globalization. The process of globalization is overwhelming and involves practically all countries of the world with rare exceptions which

Immigration can have some positive impacts as well as some negative ones. Both the hosts and originals are affected by it.

Many people feel that change of resident country is positive for both society and individuals, where others believe that it leads more harm than merits. This essay discusses both sides of this argument and then I will give my own perspective.

“The rise in the number of international migrants reflects the increasing importance of international migration, which has become an integral part of our economies and societies. Well-managed migration brings important benefits to countries of origin and destination, as well as to migrants and their families,” (Hongbo, Wu 2016).

It is important to be familiar with the definition of immigration; it is the term ‘by where individuals and/or groups leave one country to seek work and better standards of living in another country or continent’ . In addition to this, the current economic climate, movement of migrants is encouraged, in order to aid economies and promote skilled labour. Sparsely populated, yet territorially large countries such as Sweden and Finland have policies in place to encourage immigration, not just for work purposes but also to help those who are fleeing war stricken, poverty ridden countries such as Syria to claim refuge in a safe haven.

The importance of this study is to alert both people and government of the causes of Rural-urban migration and its effect on economic growth. The effects of rural-urban migration on both rural and urban areas are alarming, overpopulation on the