Military Contractors

During the 1950’s we see an economic boom in America. A large amount of this growth has to do with the money made by Corporations with Military Contracts making goods and supplies for the United States Military. With the Cold War beginning the push for new invention in aviation, rocket propulsion, energy, and even automobiles was at the forefront of national defense. Industrial giants like Boeing, General Dynamics, and Raytheon received 60% if their income from the Defense Department. Ten percent of the domestic (GDP) was from military spending. With fears of falling behind the Soviet Union, gaining any edge in innovation was important. The government even funneled millions of dollars into American Universities for scholarships and research

It became apparent very quickly that this was not an isolated example; that this was not an isolated problem. Nalder found it in one job after another from Patrick Air Force base in Florida, to fort Leonard Wood Army Base in Missouri. American Eagle’s military home-building projects had fallen behind schedule. In Jacksonville, Arkansas, home of Little Rock Air Force Base, local Journalist John Hoffheimer reported that civilians were suffering from American Eagle’s actions as well. The first indication there were any problems, occurred when there were rumors that some contractors were being paid late or perhaps not being paid at all. Most of these were small companies, which was putting them in a financial bind. There was one sub-contractor filed for bankruptcy. Dozens of other settle for small percentages of what they owed. However, there was one that held out, Tommy Austin, Cement business. They were contracted to pour the foundations of more that 200 homes for American Eagle. His lawyers are still trying to get all the money he says he was promised. In the end, the Air Force actually bears some of the responsibility because they did not have tight controls over this process Films Media Group. (2009, June 30).

On January 17, 1961 President Dwight D. Eisenhower delivered his farewell address to the nation, his final public speech as President of the United States. As such it was his last opportunity to address the nation, on any subject of his choice, with the authority, prestige and preeminence that comes with the office of President of the United States. His choice, what he termed the Military Industrial Complex, was perhaps something that at the time did not register in the mind of the average American as a priority when placed along the topics of the Communism, the Cold War and nuclear war. Yet, as it turns out the issue regarding the Military Industrial Complex and Eisenhower's warnings about it have outlasted the fears of the mid 20th century.

During the 2018 Senate budget accountability meeting, Senator Bernie Sanders says, “since 1995 Boeing, Lockheed Martin and United Technologies have paid nearly $3 billion in fines or related settlements for fraud or misconduct- $3 billion collectively. Yet those three companies received about $800 billion of defense contracts over the past 18 years” (Senate). All of these companies are private defense companies that design and manufacture weapons for the Department of Defense if the money if followed. These defense companies have paid 0.375 percent in fines for fraud compared to the amount they were given by the Department of Defense over eighteen

This paper will elaborate the Department of Defense subcontracting plan programs, Acts, and policies that are in effect. Furthermore, will detail the type of subcontracting plans, when they apply, procedures, and routing given by the Federal Acquisition Regulation. Following will explain how subcontracting plans are utilized in source selections, the economic impacts subcontracting has on small businesses, and how subcontracting plans are managed.

The Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies (MCVARA) is a subcommittee under The Appropriations Committee. The Appropriations Committee reviews and approves budget requests (funding legislation) from MCVARA. Once the funding legislation is reported to and approved by the Senate, the Senate works with the House to have the legislation approved and passed by the beginning of the fiscal year which falls on October 1st.

Following World War II, President Eisenhower coined the term "military-industrial complex" to describe the relationship between private arms manufacturers, the armed forces and the government. This coalition collaborated to bloat the American military budget in order to make money for the companies. Corruption in the government contributed to allowing this. The

Zakheim and Kadish explain two decades ago, there were more than twenty prime contractors competing for defense contracts while today the government relies on just six contractors to build its defense systems. Zakheim and Kadish state, “The system largely forgoes competition on price, delivery and performance and replaces it with a kind of “design bureau” competition”. The report explains that firms such as Boeing and Lockheed Martin have operated in collaboration on several projects such as the Air Force’s next generation bomber (Zakheim & Kadish, 2008). Collaboration of this nature suggests cooperative equilibrium between the firms to enhance their mutual payoff of outbidding competitors. With the defense market on the downturn pending major budget cuts over the next several years, more collaboration strategies are possible for firms to remain competitive. The existing procurement system encourages bargaining among the government and bidding firms. When budgets are allocated generously, demand is high and firms can set their prices higher. Budget cuts decrease demand and increase bargaining between buyer and seller. Security Industry reports budget deficits subject contracts to greater

Lockheed Martin was attempting to consolidate the Defense Industry, in reality they were trying to put a strangle hold on it. The advantage would have been setting the market price heavily in their favor since they bought out all the other competitors. The government wasn’t naive to what they were doing and it cost Lockheed

During that same House Committee hearing, Rep. McKinney also confronted Rumsfeld questioning why Dyncorp has continued to receive contracts even though the company had been involved with human trafficking. In short, DynCorp is an exceedingly politically-connected corporation with executives and board members who served in the Reagan and Clinton administrations. Nonetheless, in response to McKinney’s question, Rumsfeld answered, “I’m advised…that it was not the corporation that was engaged in the activities you characterized, but I’m told it was an employee of the corporation and it was some years ago in the Balkans that that took place.” To clarify, the corporation’s executives weren’t involved with trafficking, but they decided to figuratively kill the messenger once they were made aware of the heinous actions

Over the course of the last 10 years, I have served my country as both a uniformed Soldier, as well as a Special Forces contractor. Throughout my experiences in this field I have come to learn several things; a top of that list was to know when to walk away. In the winter of 2015 that's exactly what I did. During that time I found myself struggling with post traumatic stress disorder as well as recovering from a trumatic brain injury as a result of may last deployment. Left without the title of Soldier, I quickly found myself lost and without direction. Why am a telling you this you may ask? I'm telling you this because one of the most intrumental parts of my recovery was found though cooking. Somehow, amungst the chaos, cooking was one area

According to the Occupational Outlook Handbook members of the U.S military, service maintains the U.S. national defense. The military is made up of enlisted and officer careers. They work with hi-tech machinery to help in the field. People in the military wear uniforms that show their ranks by badges. This job is so important because without the military people would be in danger and lives might not be saved.

he future of private military companies (PMCs) is depended on several factors, direction of war, and regulation. There are certain factors that will help determine the long term impact with entrusting PMCs and PSCs with critical military and government functions for a long period of time. Those factors are cost efficiency, control, flexibility, control and transparency. These are some elements that will help determine the impact of the PMC and PSC impact with the government functions and also what direction the war is heading. First of all it will cost the government potentially a lot of money to keep having PMC conducting security forces functions. PSCs may be more expensive than military forces-particularly under circumstances when the US wants to provide the same level and quality of service as the military does or when there are high levels of danger. PMCs would be cost effective for the government for a short period, but for a long period of time it will be best to invest in the armed forces. Similarly, for those who believe that a long-term commitment is crucial to successful nation building in Iraq and worried that the US cannot sustain such a long term commitment, the use of PSCs may be a tool to substitute for troops and encourage staying power. Thus there are some significant benefits to be had from involving the private sector in security.

“I am not afraid of an army of lions led by a sheep; I am afraid of an army of sheep led by a lion” (“Alexander The Great”). This quote is from Alexander the Great, a king from the Argead Dynasty. He believed that an army with a good ruler was far superior than an army with a weak ruler. Private Military Contracting is a perfect career for those that want a physical and mental challenge, great pay rate, and want to see the world.

Many groups in the United States are facing delays in medical care, this is most evident and concerning when it comes to military veterans. Military veterans are experiencing extended wait times in all states, which are affecting their health and well-being. In Phoenix Arizona, over 9,000 veterans have to wait over three months to receive their required medical treatment. The number of veterans needing care is only growing with each year that passes as more service members exit combat zones and the service. These men and women are having to have blood tests done every three months as they are not able to see their primary care physicians if their lab work is over three months old, this has been observed at the Long Beach VA hospital. A veteran