Military Doctrine Defines Logistics As The Science Of Planning And Carrying Out The Movement And Maintenance Of Forces

There were certain items or supplies that each soldier needed to possess that aided in their survival. Other items were discretionary or optional, not entirely important for the

Throughout the story, O’Brien gives long, tedious, monotonous and utterly boring lists of the things the men carried. “The things they carried were largely determined by necessity” (O’Brien 117), but each man’s necessities were different. All of the men carried very heavy loads to begin with, and added to these loads things that seemingly lightened their burdens. O’Brien’s point behind all this listing is to show the reader just how much physical weight these men carried and how slow and tedious the war in which they fought was. “They moved like mules… it was just the endless march, village to village, without purpose, nothing won or lost.” (O’Brien 124)

Soldiers in the Army of the Potomac would live and sleep in camps. In the camps they would build small two man tents, they are easily pitched, and log huts that could fit several men. They would use blankets to keep warm at night. Canteens were for them to drink fresh water. Haversacks were what they used to keep their belongings in. They had inadequate food and shelter,

When considering the evolution of logistics in warfare, it is important to realize that both opportunities and problems must be recognized for the former to be capitalized upon and the latter to be resolved. The first recorded war occurred in approximately 2700 BC; however, the prevailing attitude towards logistics in warfare remained largely unchanged for approximately 4,600 years, and that is a problem. Even among recognized experts in warfare, up until the 20th century, logistics was eschewed as a necessary evil. However, it was not considered to be an opportunity, as evidenced by Clausewitz, “so its maintenance is always a necessary condition. But, strictly viewed, all activities thus connected with it are always to be regarded only

Without logistics, the army essentially cannot last long and is doomed to lose the battle(A5). The history proves this again and again. We can observe the logistics in two aspects. On the one hand, the Britain thought they could gain all the support whatever they wanted from loyalists such as food and transportation. However, it did not go the way the British thought.

Here climate is cold with long harsh winters and moderate summers making it so that they would have to fight in harsh conditions and would have to figure out a way to stay warm. There were many hills and the soil was rocky making it unable for them to farm and supply them with food that way. There is plentiful amount of precipitation and a lot of humidity which would cause problems keeping the soldiers prepared and able to

Most soldiers had a hard time getting used to the meal they were served. Food was very important at that time. Suppose you were a soldier who marched for a long time, tired and sweaty, the only thing that can helped them gain energy was food.

So far thirty soldiers were there recovering from wounds received on the battlefield. Most of them had been injured during the Siege of Ventier. The camp was located on a plain outside of Ventier and it had few defenses. It was fit to hold fifty to sixty soldiers at a time and it had 30 medical beds. Very few of the soldiers really needed to stay there anymore, but they didn't want to go back to the death of war. But, they would have to soon. Then in the distance twenty-three soldiers accompanied by four uninjured guards were either on a stretcher or in a transport truck, some were marching. Corporal Mike Vence was in the front leading them. He was an experienced outdoorsman and an expert with a gun. After the Siege of Ventier, he had been entrusted with the responsibility of transporting injured troops from point "A" to point "B." He also was given an experienced entourage of infantry to aid him in this. Not only that but he also received three troop transport trucks and one Humvee,

During the trip to Fort Edward the British Army suffered in Numbers because of the difficult terrain and having to stop and build makeshift roads for the movement of artillery. Schuyler knew this would present problem for the enemy so he decided to waste many of the materials the British needed to move the army. This caused the British army to be short in supplies and proper transport. Another British setback was the lack of horses. Many of the soldiers were on foot which made the transport even slower.

In the 1950s, the term logistics was perceived as a word that the military use. The areas of logistics was

The surprising point me was that soldiers had to march long distances with their heavy guns to fight against enemies. There were not any good transportation facilities to move to the battle fields. They had to move by trains and boxcars. Consequently, soldiers got sickness or got fatal diseases on the way to battle fields. Finally, they faced death before they would face the enemies in battle fields.

Army sustainment is based on an integrated process (people, systems, materiel, health services, and other support) indivisibly linking sustainment to operations. The concept focuses on building a combat ready Army, delivering it to the combatant commander (CCDR) as part of the joint force, and sustaining its combat power across the depth of the operational area and with unrelenting endurance (ADRP 4-0, Chap. 1, Intro.) Sustainment maintenance is off-system component repair and/or end item repair and return to the supply system or by exception to the owning unit, performed by national level maintenance providers. National level maintenance providers include the Army

The problem the Brazilian Army is facing can bring serious problems for the formation and the training of Artillery Soldiers. Due to the amount of Artillery materials, the size of the country, and the price of the ammunition necessary to accomplish the mission, the Brazilian Army has to find a balance in order to avoid a collapse in the Artillery systems. The tendency is that they increase, since the military exercises must continue in order to the Brazilian Army can prevent, shape, and win. How does the Army can do for at least decrease the impact of these aspects in the Soldier Formation and training? What are the feasible alternatives to solve this problem? What are the impacts in the Doctrine, Organization, Materiel, Leadership, Education, Personnel, Facilities and Policy (DOTMLPF-P)? The discussion about solutions identifies some alternatives to manage the situation or at least, find a balance between Soldier preparation and resources management. One of the feasible alternatives to this problem would be to increase the number of combined exercises among the Artillery subsystems in order to capitalize resources. This way, instead of conducting a certain number of exercises per year, it is possible to conduct combined exercises among the Artillery subsystems replace the conventional approach. An aspect to consider in this case is the importance of an effective coordination center in order to synchronize the activities to effective achieve the resources

With these changes in environments comes a change in the amount and type of equipment that is needed to support the soldier doing the fighting. When this was realized, the logisticians for the military went to the private sector and asked for help.

It may sound complicated, but logistics is basically the management of stuff, and information regarding the stuff, from one place to another until it reaches the consumer. The logistical management of physical items may include integration of information (such as inventory databases and shipping schedules), material handling, production,