Military Drones Research Paper

After the terror attack of September 11, the U.S. began using drones to help fight the war on “terrorist.” The use of drones has secured the safety of our country to a certain extent. People claim that drone strikes are useful weapons in war because it kills the enemy without putting soldiers in danger. According to the article “At Issue: Targeted Strikes” by Staff, P. states, “Proponents credit drone strikes with the killing of many of top commanders of the Taliban, Al Qaeda, and argue that they are a legal form of self defense. ” The benefit of this is that U.S. soldiers do not have to step foot in unfriendly locations, where they will be exposing themselves to danger. The United States favors drone because “One advantage of drones is that they can be deployed for long periods

Is safe to use drone in war and use them here in the United States to protect us? I believe that it is safe to us drones in warfare because it saves people lives. The use of drones in war may be a good thing or it may be a bad thing to use. Over the course of this paper I will show you what all drones are good for and some of where they are not the greatest. I hope I will be a get help to the side that I am trying to show the positive of drones in warfare.

the quadcopter has four motors to move it and look nearly like a helicopter while the military grade drones are jet fuelled and look more or less the exact same as normal airplanes. So, unless you are in the military and are in need of a stealth drone, it would be best for you to go for a drone that has a simple style.

It is irrefutable that it is just a matter of time before drones, also known as Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), become a crucial part of the US Military. They effectively weaken terrorist groups, mainly Al Qaeda and ISIS or ISIL, and are much less dangerous to civilians and United States soldiers compared to other methods. Those who are skeptical of the potential role of drones in the US Military are simply ill informed.

Though military personnel lives are safer with the presence of drones, many who oppose military drones claim that they have increased the death of civilians and do not create safer environments for civilians (Terrill 22). However, drones have been proved to decrease the deaths of civilians due to the technology that allows them to pinpoint their target and strike at that specific target rather than bomb an area that the target is in. For example, in Yemen where many drone strikes have occurred, “civilian death figures… are ‘in the single digits’” (Terrill 22). Drones are claimed to have less collateral damage than the collateral damage caused by manned aerial vehicles. “They strike quickly, and the missile can be diverted from its original target in an unintentional miss” (Hazelton 30). In the drone strikes in Yemen, even President Hadi admits that there are accidental civilian deaths (Terrill 22). But whether ground troops are used, whether manned aerial vehicles are used, or whether drones are used, there will always be a possibility for collateral damage and civilian deaths. However, President Hadi also admits that “Yemen’s air force cannot bomb accurately at night, but US drones do not have any problems doing so” (Terrill 22).

Revolutionary but yet destructive is how I describe the drones today. Drones are initially designed for recreational tools but with clever thinking, it allows consumers to use it to gain advantage. The advantages can be for the public or just the user. This makes me wonder is it truly beneficial to have drones flying freely in a public place.

Drones are an immoral counter-terrorism act that “violate international laws against summary execution” (Sluka 94). In other words the US might as well say they are trying to rid of Middle Eastern ethnicities in a rare form of genocide carried out by the use of drone and drone related air strikes. Thousands of war casualties fall victim to drone strikes, way more than the actual terrorists targeted by the

There has been a controversy on the use of drones and in what way it could help the the country. Indeed, it has many risk factors and can be very dangerous if not known how to use. But, it could help the government. As a matter in fact, the United States Military has been known to use drones for surveillance purposes. In the recent years, drones have started to be used in foreign countries to target people who have been branded as terrorist leaders. Drones are flying robots that can enter dangerous places where humans aren’t capable. This could be very useful because we don’t have to put our life in risk. They also have the use of cameras, heat sensors, and radars. They can also locate figures from up to twenty-five miles away. This makes them

Fortunately, drone strikes are known for being some of the most deadly weapons in the U.S.’s large arsenal. Drones are valued for their endurance, being capable of loitering above a target for days (Source A) due to their lightweight fuselage and fuel-efficient motors. They are also prized for the precision they can demonstrate, having the capability to “kill a person in one room of a house and spare the lives of people in other rooms” (Source A). This is not a feat that can be accomplished by traditional medium- and fighter-bomber aircraft often used in the same roles drones are working to replace. Drones are also capable of minimizing infantry and pilot casualties by keeping them out of the way of hostile snipers, firefights, suicide bombers, antiaircraft fire, landmines, and weather conditions (Source J).

According to PBS in January two hostages being held by Al Qaeda were killed in a drone strike (f#5). In order to conduct a drone strike a US official must approve a strike before it is carried out. Whether or not the US had the knowledge of these two innocent lives being murdered it undercovers the lack of sensibility and responsibility of how these strikes are being handled. To furthermore show the government’s …………. the information and statistics about these drone strikes are not released to the public as stated by the Bureau Investigates(f#5) an independent journalism company which conducts their own studies of drone strike information. According to the Bureau of Investigation there are

Drones are flying objects fitted with propellers that make the flight possible. They are extensively used in aerial photography as well as filming that further helps in various research purposes. Drones fitted with high quality camera can be used to capture pictures and videos with high definition. Some advanced drones can also continuously transmit the information to your smart phones or hand held display devices.

Drones have been used in a way that is affecting innocent civilians at home and abroad. The negative use of drones under the Obama administration and the lack of accountability is evident as Professor David Cole states: “You can't get any of the political accountability, the legal accountability, the world accountability, until there is transparency.” (US catholic 1). What this says is that there is a big lack of transparency from people very high up in the military sector. The Government has been very unclear about what happens with a drone strike and instead just tells us that drone strikes are happening. The lack of detail and lack of acknowledgement for middle east civilians is a huge problem. Without the government and military being clear with us the news of several civilian deaths from drone strikes will continue to be a major issue. The problem lies with the fact that the government also does not fully acknowledge its own drone program

It is clear that drones can give the United States and incredible advantage when it comes to combatting adversaries. According to former President Barack Obama, “dozen of highly skilled al Qaeda commanders, trainers, bomb makers and operatives have been taken off the battlefield. Plots have been

Eleven years ago, the United States Air Force launched a missile from a drone for the first time at a test range in the Nevada desert (Drone Test) . The use of armed drones has risen dramatically since 2009. Now drone strikes are almost a daily occurrence. In 2011 the use of drones continued to rise with strikes in (Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, Somalia. Proponents of armed drones argue that their ability to watch and wait, with their highly accurate sensors and cameras gives increased control over when and where to strike its both increasing the chances of success and

Drones are advancing the battle field by increasing the impact that our weapons can have and are causing great destruction. It has been published that more civilians have been killed than military personnel. Military drones have caused 176 deaths of children. In total deaths that have been confirmed is 2800, alleged deaths are up to 4,100. The lives that are taken are not just terrorists they are innocent children and people.