Military Experience Research Paper

This paper looks at the question in reference to “Should the President Be Required to Have Served in the Military?” in reference to be allowed to why the candidates should serve the officer before being considered for president. It also looks at the point given by some who argue, the President Be Required to Have Served in the Military they believe it will help the citizens respect your opinions and authority more. The government may have reasons to why the President Be required to have served in the Military. This paper highlights why the President Be required to have served in the Military and the opposing side to that right.

For that reason, the responsibility should be reduced in order to enable the president handle only the responsibilities that matches his skills and qualifications. Therefore, the president responsibilities should be reduced by allowing him to appoint some representatives to handle for him the roles that require high expertise and training. For instance, president may not have necessary experience to handle his commander in chief or the responsibility of acting as economic guardian; hence, he should appoint somebody with necessary educational background and qualifications to handle these roles.

A president’s job is to keep their citizens safe and protect them from potential harm. Many presidents have ran into trouble while trying to defend their country.

The president of the United States is our commander and chief of the U.S. Armed Force. As we know the president leads the country in line with his job within the executive branch of government to enforce the laws created, tabled, and passed by congress. The pressure is enormous and being that it may look easy, it is not. Every president had to endure a great deal of work while in office. In order to be focus under pressure can be of great use during times of conflict (war). Presidential powers in dealing with domestic and foreign affairs through its co-existing of war will show how and why war is constitutional.

He is responsible for raising, training, supervising, and deploying all the defense forces. He reviews the troops and often awards service medals. The President meets with military officers, as well as civilian national security advisors.

1. The President of the United States, (POTUS), is the Commander in Chief of the military forces of the United States and of the state National Guard units when they are called into active service for the United States

Aside from leading the executive branch, the president is commander-in-chief of the armed forces, and head of state. The thirty-one states and federal district must elect the president by a majority. Once elected, after six years in office, the president cannot be re-elected. Other job requirements of the president include appointing the mayor of Mexico City, ambassadors, Supreme Court judges, and consuls general. Being Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces also allows the presidents to decide the top officials of the Army, Navy, and Air Force. With approval from the Senate, the president can declare

One very important trait for the president is bravery. A brave president will be willing to fight for our country when we are under attack from an enemy. If a country declares war on the US then our president should be intelligent, brave, and have the right mind set on how to defeat the enemy. A president will have countless times of disapproval from residents of our country; however, he/she must be brave enough to stand tall about their idea that they feel is best for us and our future.

The President of the United States has many roles. The role that I believe that is most important is commander in chief. The commander in chief is the head of all of the armed forces in The United States, and has the final decision on whether or not we attack an enemy. These decisions are extremely stressful and significant, because of the lives that are at risk. Being able to tell military commanders what to do, or not do, based on the data that you have received is very significant, and is by far, the most significant role of the president.

The President of the United States (U.S.) as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces and the head of Government as well, has an enormous responsibility to maintain the balance between politics and security matters. In this regard, the role of advisors and counselors, responsible for directing sensitive security agencies and organizations, is fundamental to the success of the decision-making process, especially when the eyes of the world are expectant of the behavior of such a leading nation. However, nations and organizations are led by imperfect human beings who in turn translate their strengths and weaknesses to such structures. The National Security environment is not strange to this phenomenon and some administrations have had a more prominent

For instance, according to Making Foreign Policy report (2017), as the leader of the military, the president can use force in foreign countries without the approval of the Senate and can also recognize and endorse executive agreements with foreign nations via the ambassadors. Additionally, the president has admittance to discretionary funds that has been used to finance either military actions in other countries or diplomatic initiatives through convoys appointed by the president. Given this, the POTUS has direct and implied powers in directing and influencing the foreign policy adopted by the United States (Magleby, David, Light, Paul, Nemacheck & Christine,

Many presidents haven't made good decisions in how to help the country when most needed. The president should be able to decide what decisions should be made to help the country. They should also be aware that a lot of people depend on the chooses he decides.

First off a president must have knowledge about the government. By this I mean they must know how to run a country. If they were a governor, they would know how to run a state. They are perfect candidates to run the country. However, if they get enough votes to run with no political knowledge, then they should not be allowed to run. I think that there must be a minimum limit of how many years you must have ran as some political leader. A president must also be smart with their power. They cannot go around bombing every country that causes us issues. As well, they must not make decisions without thinking it thorough. For example, America went off a hunch that Iraq had a weapon of mass destruction and invaded them. As it turns out, they did not. However, they had just started a war. The president should have said," Look, that is just a gut feeling. It might be a hoax." However, we invaded a random country that did nothing wrong.

The first one would be to make sure that whoever is elected to that office would have to have had prior service in our Armed Forces. If you are going to be the Commander in Chief of the Military, You have to have served

The start of this ongoing discussion goes back to when this country started. George Washington was the first President of the United States and he had previously served in the Military. He served in the American Revolutionary War as the commander of the Continental Army (“Can you name”). America prospered with George Washington as President, but they also prospered in ways with Presidents that did not have military experience. Barack Obama had one of the most prosperous terms despite having no military experience. His term has caused many people’s opinion to veer away from the requirement of having a President with experience in the military. This topic of discussion has been around for centuries. This will always be an argument every four years when it is time for a new President.