Military Installation Threat-Level Response

Well the principal duty is to provide a vanguard to defend against foreseeable threats which possess a strong ability and clearly defined intent to harm the society's

The President of the United States of America issued the Homeland Security Presidential Directive (HSPD)-5 on February 28th, 2003 for managing Domestic incidents like terrorist attacks. The HSPD-5 helped create the National Incident Management System (NIMS), (Homeland Security, 2004). The use of the Incident Management System and Incident Command System can help manage the response to an attack involving Weapons of Mass Destruction among many other emergencies. These systems allow for coordination to be used in a proper and efficient manner. Without a system in place communication and coordination can fall apart and the response will not be prompt as it needs to be to protect lives and infrastructure.

Among one of the missions of The U.S. Department of Homeland Security is to protect and preserve the security of the Cyberspace in the country. The principal objective of this Security Plan is to give instructions and direction for the Department’s workers and help the Homeland Security to create best practices and strategies in the IT security system.

I arrived at approximately 6:55. Due to the Savannah Tech financial aid department dropping Doyle, Pirl, Jones, Ports, and Pruett from our class, starting our work in the classroom was delayed. This left Duck, Skeele, and I with little to do until Chief Robertson fired up the FATS machine. We started by running one of the practice scenarios where moving targets are placed on what appears to be a European street. This was set up at my request, and I thoroughly enjoyed every minute of it. After all three of us had a chance to shoot, Chief Robertson gave us a new practice that we have never tried. This one had a series of numbers lined up much like a key pad on a telephone. When instructed the shooter would engage a certain numbers, or series of numbers. After this

It is impossible for any organization to stay current on their homeland security preparedness efforts without including a plan for the future. Key questions to ask during this part of the assessment include: Who will be involved in the development of the organization’s homeland security planning? How will the organization’s homeland security efforts develop to meet newly emerging threats? Key areas that must be considered in an organization’s planning include: the needs of the customer, technological advancement to meet newly emerging threats, how to increase the organization’s strengths and diminish its weaknesses, and financial concerns such as budgeting for homeland security

When it comes to the protection and mitigating of any structure or organization risk analysis and vulnerability assessments must be conducts so as to know what’s to be protected, the threats manmade or natural disaster, ranking the potential of threat as well as the probability. In terms of critical infrastructure the risk analysis and vulnerability assessment has guidelines from Homeland Security Presidential Directive Number 7(HSPD-7).

This is a highly responsible professional position located within the Bureau of Preparedness and Response. This position works under the supervision of the OMC Manager-SES of the Evaluation and Analysis Unit. This position is responsible to implement and sustain the unit’s projects pertaining to the areas of Vulnerability Assessment, Preparedness Capabilities Evaluation, Response System Evaluation and Analysis, and Analysis and Evaluation Management. The specific duties and responsibilities of this position are:

That part of security concerned with physical measures designed to safeguard personnel, to prevent unauthorized access to equipment, installations, material, and documents and to safeguard them against espionage, sabotage, damage, and theft.

The fifth ranking priority is Environmental Response/Health and Safety. This pertains to any immediate threat to the health and safety of persons stemming from an environmental threat. Thus, such a threat should be contained, managed, minimalized, marginalized, eliminated or cordoned off. Any required experts should be brought in and/or consulted.

The involvement of DoD into the implementation of the emergency plan is particularly important in case of terrorist activities. For example, if terrorist hijack an aircraft, the assistance of DoD will be essential (). The involvement of DoD will help to eliminate the terrorist threat faster and more effectively due to the use of the military. DoD has the military force, equipment and technologies essential for addressing such threats as terrorist attacks. Moreover, in such cases the deployment of the military under DoD command may be essential to protect the public and maintain the public safety.

System approach is defined the physical security to appropriate measure to decrease the loss of personal, equipment, material and supplies for threats against human and natural. Leaders prove the responsibility of physical security officer, force protection officer and provost marshal. Protecting the assets based on systematic process to integrate the system. Specific assets are protected contrast to threats to acceptable levels of protection. Protecting asset is developed for building and facilities that contained

Before I plan for security, I will ensure that the suitable officials are assigned to security responsibilities, continue reviewing the security system controls in their information systems, and authorize the system processing before the operations. These management responsibilities are believed to have responsible agency officials that understand the risks and other factors that could affect the mission. Additionally, these officials must also understand the current status position of their security program and the security controls that protect their information and the information systems that makes investments that mitigate the risk to an acceptable level. The objective is to conduct a day-to-day operation and to accomplish missions with adequate security, including the increase of harm resulting from unauthorized access, modification, disruption, usage, or disclosure of information. The key element of FISMA Implementation Project, NIST developed a Risk Management Framework which will bring all of the FISMA related guidance and security standards to promote developmental comprehension and balance information security programs by different agencies.

Force protection is a term used to describe all actions to protect and safeguard U.S. forces from adverse actions. Force protection measures can include patrolling a perimeter, hardening a building or emplacing obstacles to increase standoff. These measures require time and effort to achieve, and commanders must carefully assess their mission and area of operations to determine the appropriate allocation of resources. If considered early in mission analysis and incorporated throughout the planning process, force protection measures actually enhance combat effectiveness and productivity by safeguarding U.S. forces and ensuring that the commander has the necessary combat power available to apply at the decisive point and time in battle.

Preserve the innocent is their main objective, while eliminating the werwulf threat. RA Directives define and indicate proper use of force concerning opponents.

1. How can a security framework assist in the design and implementation of a security infrastructure?