Milton Friedm Free Market Monetarism

Milton Friedman and John Keynes are two world renowned economist, with many similar and contrasting views that have helped set the foundation of our economy. Friedman 's ideology on subjects such as the Monetary Policy, Gold Standard, and the Theory of the consumption function are what made him a extremely impactful economist. Keynes has made his impact on the modern day world as well in many aspects. Both of these economists have helped pave the way to a better, more efficient economy.

Friedman’s position we can see it as a theory for short term investment and businesses, while Freeman’s theory targets businesses that are planning to stay for a longer term. Also I believe that Friedman’s theory affects society in an inefficient way when costs are not really paid, as for example pollution, traffic congestion, no taxes, and poorly educated workforce. Another problem with Friedman’s position is that it assumes that forces of competition are sufficiently vigorous, but they are not. In addition the distribution of income that results from profit maximization is very

Franco Modigliani said that “I am delighted with the success of Michael Hamburger and impressed by his love, respect and admiration for his work. He said that I wish I could claim a little bit credit for this success because he was my student. But as he arrived I left soon, he was my student for a short time.

Among economists, it is said Adam Smith is one of the main contributors to modern free market economics. His thoughts attacked mercantilism which was the prevalent form of government at the time. His works provided systematic rationales in the subjects of capitalism, free markets, and limited government intervention. His most popular books changed history because without them, many of these thoughts and ideas would not be so prevalent. Smith is regarded and cited as the father of modern economics. With this said, not all of Smith’s ideas were in agreement with laissez-faire. Although Adam Smith pioneered many ideas on modern free market economics, Smith cannot be depicted as a defender of laissez-faire because of his ideas on

Hayek believed the economy should remain untouched and in times of trouble, with enough time, the markets would regain equilibrium. He also surfaced the ideas that increasing taxes led to discouragement of consumer spending. These ideas are viewed as flawed because during times of depression unemployment remains constant and there is so guaranteed time issues will resolve while the economy is trying to rebalance itself. No government regulation results in unfair monopolies of industries or businesses in the free market. This restricts modern liberal principles such as the equality of outcome. No government intervention is an ineffective way to structure the economy. It allows for numerous issues such as cheap labor, overpriced goods, non-equal wages. All issues could be resolved through government action and regulation. Hayek’s ideas can be closely ties with those of the Untied States president in 1981, Ronald Reagan. Reagan upheld a huge economic practice know as “Trickle-Down Economics”. This practice involved an attempt to redistribute wealth among different social classes. The government would cute taxes on wealthier citizens with hopes the wealth would trickle down in the economy through mass spending of the elite. This effect was never successful in practice, by cutting taxes for the rich it left them with a high concentration on wealth. This practice aimed at the wrong target and did not prevent relative poverty; it just increased the economic gap between the rich and poor. Both theory’s are evidently flawed and validate the need for a government to obtain economic responsibilities. Regulations ensure an equal ground for the mixed market, which is a key aspect in a stable economy. Modern liberal principles require government involvement to achieve economic

Lorenzo smith Mr. Alvarado P.5 Gilded Age During the Gilded Age America was going through a time of extreme change, advancements, and also conflicts. The gilded age was originally coined by Mark twain who described the times as gilded with gold and fortune but under the surface was filled with unnoticed conflicts. The Gilded Age lasted from 1870-1900 and was a time of rapid economic that created some of the big businesses we know today.

Milton Friedman advocates the classical theory of business, which essentially holds that businesses should be solely devoted to increasing profits as long as they engage in open and free competition devoid of fraud. Friedman was an advocate of free market forces, he would recommend that let the market forces operate freely and the executive compensation will reach the right levels. The high performing executives will command higher salaries and poor performing executives will receive lower salaries or simply become unemployed. If

Milton Friedman believed a free-market system, in which goods and services are exchanged and controlled by individuals and privately-owned businesses without government authority, was the only way to achieve personal freedom. Adam Smith, a 18th century philosopher and economist, held the belief that in a free society, the role of government should be limited to the protection of the people, the administration of justice through the court system, and the maintenance of all public resources. Adam Smith developed the concept of the “invisible hand” theory, which says within a society that is free of government interference, individuals can pursue actions out of their own self-interest, and the collective result of this

Since the early days of the United States, the Founding Fathers and other brilliant minds sought ways to understand and make sense of the inner workings of society and the economic market. Out of the many thinkers and developers of that time period, perhaps none made so great an impact on American society as the Scottish contemporary philosopher and political economist, Adam Smith—who is most known for his influential work, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, By the early nineteenth century, other streams of economic theory emerged from various individuals who were also influenced by the ideas of Smith. Some of these individuals included David Ricardo, Karl Marx and later John Maynard Keynes and Milton Friedman—each of whom contributed their own ideas on economic activity. However, it was Smith’s ideas on capitalism and his laissez-faire approach to free markets that have transcended other economic theories and continue to impact American economic thought to this day.

Mr. Friedman was influenced by Fredrich von Hayek a free-market thinker and believed that the government should stay out of peoples affairs whenever possible letting and that market could solve economic problems more efficiently than government officials could. This idea became known as the “Chicago School” of economics, a concept of free-market capitalism. (Placeholder2)

Capitalism and Freedom, written by Milton Friedman, seems to focus significantly on the connections between the economics and politics, and the effect that those have in various aspects of society. This relationship was referred to throughout the book, and the topics Friedman discusses ranged between governmental control of money, to foreign policy and trade and the effect that has on our economy. Through the course of the book, Friedman constantly refers to his “classical liberal” view, which focuses on the freedoms and power of the individual in society. Friedman shows his support of this view during the book using the idea of a laissez-faire government. For Freidman, government involvement in issues regarding society should

Milton Friedman is the author of many books and two public television series that he did with his wife Rose: Free to Choose(1980) and Tyranny of the Status Quo(1984). His most important books include Free to Choose and Tyranny of the Status Quo( both of which compliment the TV series), Capitalism and Freedom(1962 with Rose D. Friedman); and Bright Promises, Dismal Performance (1983), which consists mostly of reprints of tri-weekly columns that he wrote for Newsweek from 1966 to 1983. Also, A Theory of the Consumption Function(1957) and A Monetary History of the U.S.(1963 with A.J. Schwartz).

The fact that free markets are based on a contractual agreement between the buyer and seller with very little government control makes it feasible to consider it to be compatible with individual freedom. (Free Market: 2014) Classical liberals may agree with the objectives of free markets, as they emphasise the importance of individual freedom with limited control of the state. (Hagopian)The counter argument is that when the free market economy is fuelled by profit motives, it sacrifices some ethical and economic issues which can cause severe consequences. (Gerald Hanks: 2014) Modern Liberals argue that although individual freedom is important, coercion can be used as a positive outlook of bettering individuals to the best of their ability.

Although Milton Friedman might be an expert on economic theory, his libertarian views on capitalism, the role of government, and discrimination would leave victims of religious, color, and race discrimination (particularly black Americans) struggling for individual freedom and to escape poverty and isolation. In his book Capitalism and Freedom, Milton Friedman states that “there is an intimate connection between economics and politics” and that “economic freedom is also an indispensable means toward the achievement of political freedom.” Central to his thesis is that individual political and economic freedom is essential, and this freedom is achieved through limiting the scope of government involvement. Friedman’s theory regarding discrimination (using his discriminators of race, religion, color) is fundamentally flawed because he ignores the costs to society and individuals resulting from discrimination, the loss of individual freedom of the person being discriminated against, and he believes that government involvement is not necessary to ensure individual freedom for the victims of discrimination.

A Laissez Faire economy is where there is little to no government interference between two private parties. A Laissez Faire economy with no government intervention generates many possibilities for economic and social growth. Although this concept seems like an ideal model for the American culture some could dispute this view, and say that government intervention within the economy should be the main way business should be conducted in the economy. When the government intervenes between two private parties the government acts as the intermediary between the two parties and can settle any problems that may come from these interactions. Both of these economical concepts were both created so that an economy can be as efficient a productive