Minimum Driving Age Research Paper

Young drivers should have to wait until they are 18 years old to get their license because 16 year olds are more likely to get in an accident than an older driver. One author said, “Sixteen-year-old drivers are the most likely to crash, so raising the age at which teens could get their license would save many lives…” (Rubin). Rubin gives a valid reason to why the minimum driving age should be raised from 16 to 18. If the driving age is raised, there would be less people involved in wrecks, which would help the world out as a whole. Even though 16 year olds are more accident prone than other drivers, taking 16 year olds off of the road would save the lives of everyone on the road. However, there are people who believe that the minimum driving age should not be raised because of various reasons. One article states that, “If they have to wait until they are 17 or 18, they remain dependent on parents practically until they are ready to go off to college, join the military or take a

The big debate as to whether the legal driving age should be raised to eighteen is an ongoing issue. There are both arguments for and against this matter. Younger drivers, as well as old ones, can cause many life-threatening accidents; therefore, raising the minimum driving age could significantly reduce the number of accidents. The accident rates can be lowered considerably if the legal driving age is bumped up to eighteen. This would mean that no more kids could get hurt or worse, killed in a car accident.

On the counterclaim side if the driving age is raised to 18 then it will save young lives.On Average about nine teens ages 16-19 are killed everyday from car wrecks. If it's raised to 18 then there won’t be as many teens ages 16 and 17 killed in car wrecks. A lot of teens lose their lives a year do to car accidents. On average about 6,000 teenagers die a year due from car wrecks. So that's why it might be a good idea. According to( DRIVE-SAFELY.NET) “ A sixteen year old is almost twice as likely to die in a car crash then a 30 year old.”

I understand that individuals want the driving age to be raised. Sixteen-year-olds can be very irresponsible and immature. There are also the safety concerns that can happen, for example, car crashes. However, I believe that the age requirement to drive should stay the same. Teens get the freedom they have been wanting. Teens are able to get jobs to help save up for college. Teens can also learn the responsibilities that come with driving or owning a vehicle. Therefore, what I am trying to say is sixteen-year-olds are responsible enough to

The problem of inexperience in starting drivers can not be fixed by raising the minimum driving age. If the minimum age is raised to 18, then the crashes with 16 and 17 year olds will become very small. However, the original amount of crashes will be seen with the 18 year olds, as they will be in the same situation as the 16 year olds did, but with a few years of experience. Therefore, they will react in a similar way, not affecting the total amount of crashes or the lack of safety on the road caused by these inexperienced drivers. In Source 2, “Teenage Driving Laws May Just delay deadly Crashes”, Anahad O’Connor states, “‘When you look at the bigger picture across 18- and 19-year-olds, it looks like we’re offsetting those saved crashes,’ he said. ‘In fact, 75 percent of the fatal crashes we thought we were saving actually just occurred two years

If the age limit were raised to the age of eighteen, it would give teenagers time to practice on driving skills and safety regulations of the road. Furthermore, if teens are given more time to practice and understand specific guidelines, it will gradually make them better drivers and help them recognize smart driving skills.

Raising the driving age will cause more death to the older teen by them waiting until their 18 because if they wait they wouldn't have to go through the hoops young teen had to go through. Aubrey’s article states, “ 18 year old drivers increased, and they were behind the wheel and 1,086 more fatal accidents including 18 year olds.” Although scientist have found that 16- year olds have more fatal car crashes. 16 year olds have better experience then 18 year olds because some 16 year olds go through

Have you ever drove under the age of 16? Most people have because some people drive while on the farm or parents teach them while they are young that's why the Minimum driving age should be 16 because, it's the age where your getting a job or needing to go somewhere but this action comes with responsibility, jobs, and school so these are the reasons you should keep the driving age the same.

If the teenage driving age gets brought up to 18, we face two problems. One being they won’t gain experience driving. Number two, parents are going to get more pressure put on them to take their under-aged children everywhere.

The driving age should resume to stay at 16, because high school is the time you need to start learning how to be independent as a young adult. This teaches the young adults at an early age, really big responsibilities that they will need to learn also in the long run. There will be times that you won't have anyone to drive you to a certain place that you need to be based on circumstances. By the time you are 18, you are considered an adult by then. If you are just learning to drive, how are you suppose to be comfortable going places without being afraid to be in an accident or cause an accident, because you never drove before? Raising the driving age won't save lives. It's inexperience, not age, that causes accidents. Raising the driving

Teens tend to be safer drivers then their middle-aged counter parts. The number of 15-20-year-old drivers in 2008 in single-vehicle crashes made up 14%, multi-vehicle was 10.4%, and 15-20year old drivers made up 11.9% of all fatal crashes; while the more middle aged 25-34year old drivers consisted of 20.9% for single vehicle crashes, 19% of all multi-vehicle crashes, and 19.8% of all fatal crashes, immensely higher stats then the teen drivers. This shows that teens are by far safer drivers then the middle aged, mature, adults.

With sixteen year olds driving there is a higher risk of accidents. Even though some sixteen year olds drive safe there is a big amount that does not. Therefore the driving age limit should be raised just by 2 years.

Driving is undoubtedly a huge privilege that not everyone deserves. A driver’s license gives a teenager a lot of freedom and allows them to do many things unsupervised. The minimum driving age should be fifteen because the ability to drive saves time for the whole family and creates responsibility.

Teens now and days have trouble learning there turns, how to park, or even how to use the navigation system. Why not prepare teens at a earlier age so they can get a feel of what they are up against, because at the age you are eligible to get your full license you have so much responsibility you already have to depend on others to get you to such as a job, school, or if you just need something from a nearby corner store. Being a safe driver is not only for your kids safety but brings down the stress level of your parents. If your child was a exuberant driver you won't have to worry about getting a call that your child has been in a bad accident, or the received a problem with the law. You will not have to worry about your child being in a accident if their reaction time is excellent. Reaction time is key while driving, the younger you are the faster your reaction time will be. That way, it would be less likely for your child to be involved in a collision with other vehicles. Learning the safety of driving now while you are ready, can really benefit teens in the future to be a smart

The minimum driving age has been questioned because of the amount of accidents. Data results have shown that there are more fatal crashes involving 15 to 20-year-old drivers than any other age. But over the years, that percentage has decreased