Many people fear monsters, whether the monster is an ugly imaginary creature, or monster a cruel + second adjective human having cruel actions. They have been around for as long as we could remember, interfering with adult lives as well as children. I believe monsters are imaginary beings that are ugly, frightening, and violent. Monsters inspire fear in humans, have cruel destructive desires, and are ugly/deformed. Still feels like two definitions here, back to back Monsters inspire fear in humans. For instance, the Minotaur is a hybrid monster from Greek mythology with a body of a man and a head and tail of a bull. In the story of the Minotaur he is known as a horrendous creature that destroys and consumes anything in sight. Theseus, …show more content…
In the text it is says that the Minotaur, “Father, this is terrible...We cannot sacrifice any more of our citizens to this tyrant. When it is time to send the next tribute, i will go as one of them and i vow that it is the last time the Minotaur will be fed with the flesh of any of our people”. Theseus is very brave and did what he felt was right. This Greek monster creates fear in humans because he eats them. Similarly, Mr. Hyde, from The Strange case of Dr.Jekyll and Mr. Hyde fits the same characteristics as inspiring fear in humans with his appearance as well as his actions. Mr. Hyde, who is also Dr. Jekyll, is produced with a scientific drug created by Dr. Jekyll himself. In the text it says, create contextual transition--Mr. Hyde’s murder of Sir Danvers Carew is frightening etc. “And then all of a sudden he broke out in a great flame of anger, stamping with his foot, brandishing the cane, and carrying on like a madman.”.The citizens in the society feel despair towards Hyde because in all reality nobody exactly knows for sure who he is. Hyde's appearance as the author described is a “disgustful curiosity” and “hardly humane” which brings fear to citizens.
Dr. Jekyll is benevolent and pleasant in his social interactions. He attempts to cover up his darker self by creating a courteous public persona. Everyone has a different persona when they are outside in the eyes of the public and when they are inside. Through Mr. Hyde, Dr. Jekyll reveals his destructive side. Transforming into Mr. Hyde gives Dr. Jekyll a freedom to act and behave without caring about the public’s opinion or about the consequences of his actions. Dr. Jekyll is captured and locked up deep inside, he appears reasonably appropriate on the exterior but his inner reflections drives him towards immorality. As Dr. Jekyll privately turns into Mr. Hyde, not only is his appearance transformed, but also his behavior. This can be a similar caparison on people in today’s society. People with high status or popularity are always being watched with every move they make. If they make one small mistake, then that will look bad on
Monsters are part of an imagination so they “ –exist only to be read.” (Monsters page 12) Second Thesis says “The monster always escapes.” In this case the monster gets away with it too but this monster damaged a lot of things that can’t be undone. So the monster escapes meaning it is never truly destroyed or defeated because there’s always something it left behind. They can never be caught but they can also return in a different form way to get back at those who tried to destroy them. Third Thesis basically explains that monsters cannot be categorized in the animals or people. As Cohen says “—they are disturbing hybrids whose externally incoherent bodies resist attempts to include them in any systematic structuration.” (Monsters page 14) Their physical and psychological characteristics just don’t fit in classification because they can be half human, half animal and may have some other deforms. Fourth Thesis explains the monster is an “outsider”, they are different so it depends on “cultural, political racial economic, sexual.” (Monsters page 16) Monsters have aspects. The monster will always
What defines a monster? Is it their grotesque, unnatural appearance that separates them from the rest of mankind, or is it their lack of remorse and compassion that makes them different? The word monster conjures up figures from gothic horror of exotic peoples with horrifyingly exaggerated features, and the kinds of impossible delusive beasts inhabiting the pages of medieval bestiaries. Well at first I thought exactly that. When I used to hear the word “monster”, my mind immediately pictured the petrifying beast that took residence under my bed for a substantial portion of my childhood. It had demonic beating red eyes, razor sharp teeth that glistened with fresh blood and amphibian like scales covering every inch of its enormous body. However, as I got older, I started to realize that there was no such thing as monsters and that it was all just a figment of my imagination. Accordingly, the fear of the monster under my bed slowly dissipated. Nevertheless, it wasn’t until after reading a quote by my favorite author, Steven King, that I was finally able to fully comprehend what the true definition of the word “monster” really was. “Monsters are real, ghosts are real too. They live inside us, and sometimes they win”. It had taken me awhile to truly grasp what King had meant, but then it clicked. Everyone has a monster inside them, dormant or not. That monster is the voice we hear in the back of our heads, urging us to cheat or to steal, and in some instances, worse. That monster
This gives the impression that Hyde is a monster than comes out only when it is dark and nobody can see him. Whatever he is, he cannot be called human. In Victorian England, if a person looked ugly, criminal-like or ‘giving an impression of deformity’ they were considered to be ugly and criminal-like inside to. If you imagine a person reading this story when that was what was thought, the description of Mr Hyde would instantly label him as the bad character.
the reader links 'extraordinry quickeness' with wild animals such as lions and tigers which are often violent, strong and merciless, this then alos makes hyde seem as violent, strong and merciless and we already know this when he tramples the girl in chapter 1 'like a dammed juggernaut' this helps to make him seem more like a frightening
A little girl screams in fear for her parents as she envisions a green, three-eyed monster lurking under her bed, waiting to get her until she finally closes her eyes. A little boy scares fellow trick-or-treaters as he’s dressed as a vampire for Halloween brandishing his pointy teeth with blood dripping out of his mouth. Both of these examples of monsters focus on the physicality of a creature and undermine the weight which the word ‘monster’ actually carries. In Shakespeare’s play, The Tempest, and in Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, there are characters that perfectly fit the description of a tangible monster. However, monsters are more than their somatic features. Monsters are created within based on circumstances, decisions that are
Monsters have proven to be more than just the fiendish appearance or the evil within such creatures – their monstrosity symbolizes, more or less, the characteristics that define mankind and/or our innermost fears. Prior to this Exploration of the Humanities course, I have interpreted monsters for what they are: heartless and destructive creatures that generate fear. However, I never bothered what the true cause of such fear is – only associating the gruesome presence with a psychological reaction of horror. But taking this class allowed me to broaden my perspective on monsters and monstrosity: humans fear the “Other” because we as individuals have an “Other” within us (subconsciously) that we are not willing to show to those in our
In The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde by Robert Louis Stevenson, the character Hyde is a transfiguring of the character Jekyll, the degenerate metamorphosis of a high-class man. Hyde is an animalistic man, he is an archetype of atavism, an evolutionary throwback. Hyde is the pinnacle of Victorian fear within every aspect as well, he is a low-class man who represents pure evil, his actions revolve around Victorian horror from prostitution to committing sinister crimes in the silence of the night. Hyde is an uncanny man, he is difficult to explain but very familiar all at once, he is a symbolic figure of evil with criminalistic tendencies, he is an unleashed demon without morals or sense of compassion. Hyde's appearance greatly emphasizes
When analyzed online many of the definitions you will find for the word monster include: a strange or horrible imaginary creature, one who deviates from normal or acceptable behavior, or an animal of strange and/or terrifying shape. (Merriam Webster) When observing the “Monster Theory” by Jeffrey Cohen and the 7 theses that he provides in this text, one can begin to somewhat disagree with these formal definitions and attempt to say that it has an even greater meaning. Monsters might scare us and frighten us because of their physical appearances but also can provide us with possible solutions to gaps and uncertainties in our mind that Sigmund Freud would label as “The Uncanny”. I can only but agree with
“As monstrous races faded from popularity, the increased focus on unnatural or monstrous individuals added new interest in the long-standing philosophical and theological debates about whether or not monsters could be human and where monsters fit within God’s ordered universe […] philosophers and theologians in both the medieval period and the Renaissance often interpreted these monstrous individuals as carrying a specific meaning for the community into which they were born (Wright 6).”
Oxford dictionary defines monster as, “Originally: a mythical creature which is part animal and part human, or combines elements of two or more animal forms, and is frequently of great size and ferocious appearance. Later, more generally: any imaginary creature that is large, ugly, and frightening. (Oxford English Dictionary)” This definition is basic in nature. What must be added is whether it is nature that makes the monster what it is or is it nurture that makes it what it is. In both Beowulf and Frankenstein the monster complex engages, complicates and has an effect on us. Beowulf has to battle Grendel, his mom, and the dragon to do his duty as a warrior, but the monsters only make it more difficult to tell
The manner in which Hyde is first presented attracts the reader’s attention and provokes momentous assumptions from the reader that Mr Hyde is
Monsters, the creatures of the night who prey on our fear. The ones who have no sense of emotion and lack the ability to show remorse. The big, the bad, and the ugly that lurks within all of us. The term “monster” has been around for centuries, throughout the years the view on monsters has changed, but the one thing that has stayed the same is the fact that we have always viewed them as something negative. We view monsters as evil and scary. Personally, I think of blood and murder when I hear the word monster. A monster brings out our darkest and weakest sides, whether it’s the anger that they cause or the fear they bring upon us. The term monster can be defined in many different ways, depending on how we view them, but I feel like the
What is a monster? The word "monster" causes one to imagine a hideous, deformed or nonhuman creature that appears in horror movies and novels and terrifies everyone in its path. More importantly, however, the creature described generally behaves monstrously, doing things which harm society and acting with little consideration for the feelings and safety of others. "Thus, it is the behavior which primarily defines a monster, rather than its physical appearance"(Levine 13).
One of the most vital concepts incorporated into The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde is the representation and depiction of the duality of mankind. Jekyll works to find a solution which will separate him into his reckless, immoral persona and his respectable, Victorian self. After consumption, this potion causes him to completely transform into a man who is known as Hyde. As Hyde, he can express himself in immoral, evil ways. This not only includes moral and immoral wants but rational and irrational wants. Not only does this transformation enable him to keep his good reputation even while he does horrid, unacceptable things, but it allows him to do things which he most likely would not even