Miranda Rights Are More Than Words

Miranda rights are part of a routine police procedure in the United States that ensures that suspects in police custody are informed of their rights before questioning. This was a landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court after, Miranda, a suspect of rape and kidnapping was sentenced to 20-30 years imprisonment without being informed of his constitutional rights before interrogation. The court ruled that statements made in response to interrogations by a defendant in a police custody will be admissible at trial if only the prosecution can show that the defendant was informed of the right to consult an attorney and the right against self-incrimination.

The goal of this research paper is to remind people that as long as one can fulfill the duties of being a citizen in the United States of America then there are rights that protect one from the government. One could imagine what the world would be like if there were no Miranda rights. Government would take complete advantage of that and others could assume that prisons would really become overcrowded and taxes would shoot up even higher due to the absence of Miranda rights in the criminal justice system. One could assume that life in fact would not be as sweet and worth living knowing that the police can haul someone into jail and interrogate that person until a confession surfaces due to duress. Others have said that Miranda rights saved lives, some even say that without it the criminal justice has failed the citizens of the United States, this is the purpose one seeks the answers to these burning questions.

Miranda Warnings reaffirmed the rights afforded by the Fifth and Sixth Amendments: all U.S. citizens have the right to remain silent so as not to incriminate themselves, as well as the right to due process in a court of law before a jury of their peers.

The Miranda warning must be explained to every person that is the subject of an interrogation by law enforcement, consequently, there is no provision to assume the rights are known (Hall, 2015). Law enforcement personnel must explain the warnings to the individual so they can clearly understand the meaning of the warnings. A common practice of recording the giving of the rights to individuals has been used in several police departments. This is to

The United States of America prides itself on being a nation in which the people’s rights are put first and foremost. We can speak how we like and do almost anything we want, which are luxuries that people in many other countries are not given. Our Miranda Rights are an example of a guarantee that the American people are given that, at first, was not widespread throughout the world. It was Miranda vs. Arizona that established this vital warning that would enforce the constitutional rights of not only criminals, but of all citizens, and ensure that no American would be incriminated against without knowing their rights.

I think that the Miranda rights ensure justice and preserve our liberty. With out the Miranda rights read to us how would we know what kind of rights we have. The whole point of the Miranda rights are so that the civilian will understand his rights, and to ensure justice and preserve his liberty. Police officers are required to say the Miranda rights to protect the individual who is in custody and in questioning. It tell the individual about violation of his Fifth Amendment right against compelled self incrimination.

After the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Miranda, there were several changes made to the detaining and arresting processes for law enforcement in the United States. The laws were then changed to require all law enforcement to read what would go on to be titled a citizen’s “Miranda Warning” which explained, the right to remain silent, the right to a lawyer or public defendant, and that anything they say will be used against them. All of these

Miranda also protects suspects from fanatical law enforcement officials. Although most law-enforcement officials are nice men and women, some conduct ill-usage of their power. They may try to pressure suspects

In my opinion the most important of the Miranda warning is, if an individual cannot afford a lawyer on will be appointed without a fee or cost. In the Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution criminal defendants have the right to an attorney. This right is give assistance of counsel for the accused in criminal prosecutions. This is important to me because majority of defendants can’t afford an attorney to represent him/her during trial.

In actual these three amendments in our Constitution aid as safeguards for the peoples of the United States who are on trial and work to guard them from wrongness and prejudices that may occur in the criminal justice system. The Miranda Rights were made so that the individual being arrested is completely conscious of their rights so that they can’t have them used against them.

Basically, the Miranda rights are designed to let you know that you do not have to make any statements that could incriminate you. Unfortunately for suspects, it does not apply to evidence that the police have collected. If the police smell alcohol on your breath or conduct a field sobriety test, these pieces of evidence can be used against you in the courtroom. Your Miranda rights are only designed to protect you from making statements that could be used against you in the courtroom. They will not protect you from any other evidence that the police may collect.

So in simple terms Miranda Right is the right to remain silent when being held as a criminal suspect in on an ongoing case to prevent self-incrimination which is in direct violation with the Fifth Amendment. After the war of securing their independence from Britain the thirteen states created the Article of Confederation. Due to the experience with the British monarchy almost all Americans wanted government power to stay within their respected states. In doing so the Article of Confederation had a weak national government, which in turn cased quite a few major disputes between states. So they completely reorganized it and came up with the draft of the U.S Constitution that created a republican form of government.

The Miranda Warning is highly important. If the police fail to read the suspect his or her Miranda Rights the prosecutor can't use for most purposes anything the suspect says as evidence against the suspect at trial. The Miranda Warning requires that officers let you know of certain facts after your arrest, before questioning you. A rule was made that when police have you in custody, they have to remind you of your Constitutional rights before questioning you or they can't use the things you say against you in court. It's just an easy way to decide if a statement was voluntary. That's why Miranda is important, and that's why Miranda can, and does, still get criminal cases dismissed when the defendant makes incriminating statements to the police.

why should I listen to the miranda rights when the law man or women give them to me. one reason is so if the person that is getting arrested knows what rights he or she has or don't have.

Everyone has heard the term Miranda Rights, whether that be when taking a law class, during the course of a television show, or perhaps through personal experience with their use, but what do these two words really mean, where did they come from and how to they apply to an individual's everyday life? The answers to this question are neither simple nor fully answered today, as challenges to Miranda Rights appear in courtrooms routinely. However, the basis for Miranda Rights can be traced back to a landmark case handed down from the Supreme Court of the United States in 1965 entitled Miranda v. Arizona. Ernesto Miranda was an immigrant from Mexico living in the Phoenix, Arizona area in 1963 when he was accused of