Miranda Rights Report

Two boxes of ziplock baggies including loose small clear baggies were found on or near the bookshelf. On top of the bookshelf was a small clear baggie with a green leafy substance. The green leafy substance weighed 1.8 grams and field tested posotive for marihuana. The marihuana will be packaged and sent to OSBI for further testing. On the top shelf of the closet were a blue and clear bong that appeared to be used to consume marihuana. Both bongs contained water and had burnt residue. Detective Andrew Davis collected water samples from the blue and clear bong. The water samples will be sent to OSBI for further testing. A red bong was found next to the other bongs with burn residue, but did not contain water. I field tested the burn residue from each bong and the burnt residue field tested posotive for marihuana. A safe with a locking mechanism was found in the closet in the south bedroom. The safe was taken for evidence until a search warrant could be obtained to search the contents of the

Ernesto Miranda was arrested on March 31, 1963 and charged with kidnapping and rape. The arresting officer(s) transported Miranda to the police station where they conducted an interrogation, and during this time Miranda’s Fifth Amendment rights were violated. Miranda was interrogated for two hours after which he wrote a confession to the crimes he was being accused of. Once Miranda went to trial and the confession were presented in court, the defense attorney advised the judge that the confession should not be used as evidence in the case due to the fact that the police officers admitted that they did not advise Miranda of his right to have an attorney present during his interrogation.

When looking through the safe your Affiant located several items which throught training, expreience, and knowledge were identified to be drug paraphernalia, and controlled substances. In the safe there was several plastic baggies, multiple glass smoking pipes with residue, a grinder containing the odor of marijuana, several tweezers containing residue, a burnt spoon, several small glass containers, one which contained a crystal substance, a prescription bottle that contained a green vegtable substance

Sgt. Patterson began to inventory the vehicle on the passenger side. He imminently found a blue bag containing a dark brown substance consistent with black tar heroin. When he located that I began to search the driver side of the vehicle. I searched the driver side seat, driver side door and the back seat of the driver side. During my search I did not locate anything of interest except about 5 to 10 empty natural ice cans. Sgt. Patterson located more Hypodermic needles in the center

In law enforcement there is a right called The Miranda Rights. This law is very important when it comes to people getting arrested. What this law is “You have the right to remain silent. Anything that you say can and will be used against you in the court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights that I have just read to you? With these rights in mind do you wish to speak?” These rights started when Ernesto Miranda was arrested and was not read his Miranda rights.

On March 13, 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested and charged with rape, kidnapping, and robbery. He was questioned for two hours, without being informed of his rights, during which he allegedly confessed to committing the crimes and the police recorded. The written confession was admitted into evidence at trial despite the objection of the defense attorney and the fact that the police officers admitted that they had not advised Miranda of his right to have an attorney present during the interrogation. The jury found

Miranda’s case brought about a big change in the United States arresting procedure, as well as disagreements and hidden information. According to the video “The Miranda Case”, the officer that was in charge of the case had said that he did not arrest Ernesto and that his partner had told him he did not have to talk to him. Many officers back then would arrest people and tell them that they did not have to talk to them. Their confessions can be partly true or completely false, however, it is a fact that just like Mr. Miranda there have been other cases where people’s rights have been violated.

In 1966 the U.S. Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling in the case of Miranda v. Arizona that laid the groundwork for the "Miranda" warning police have been required to read to persons taken into custody before they begin questioning (Siegel, 2010, p.339). Since that time, the concept of Miranda rights has been common knowledge among both law enforcement officers and criminal defendants. These rights have been portrayed on television and in the movies, enabling many people who have never been arrested to recite them from memory. However, the controversy over whether such rights are even necessary today still rages on and many law enforcement officials lament the fact that they must continue to "Mirandize" everyone they arrest, potentially limiting the confessions they receive. The courts have continued to hold that being informed of one's rights is essential before he is questioned in regards to any criminal behavior and that failure to do so is tantamount to denying those Constitutional rights.

On the basis of the recovery of the computer, the detectives obtained a search warrant for this address. The items to be searched for included, children and laptops. The offenses involved included, human trafficking, kidnap, smuggling, and sexual misconduct with underage minors. On February 09, 2001, members of the police department’s special weapons and

The suspected methamphetamine later showed a positive presumptive test for the presence of amphetamine using a NARK II test kit and had a net weight of .5 grams. The syringes and suspected methamphetamine were later placed into evidence at the Rancho San Diego station.

I then open the driver side door and began searching the vehicle as Deputy Hill walked around the front of the vehicle he observed a small red and white Altoids box lying in front of the vehicle with a ball of electrical tape next to it. Deputy Hill then unrolled the ball of electrical tape and observed a plastic baggy containing a clear crystal like substance known to be methamphetamine. I then resumed my search of the driver side of the vehicle as I observed a gray zipper bag on the center console inside the gray zipper bag I located a small baggy containing a clear crystal like substance known to be methamphetamines. Deputy Hill then filed tested the two baggies containing the crystal like substance both baggies tested positive for

On 04-14-2016, at approximately 4:05 pm, Ms. Forney called Mr. King to respond to the Courtyard to inform him of a situation that had taken place. Upon arrival to the location Mr. King was informed by Ms. Forney that two students had gone into the 100 building and got something from under the chairs in the search area. Mr. King took both students back to the area to conduct a search. While searching Isaias Amaya-Miranda, Mr. King witnessed Joel Nathanael Perez-Corea trying to put something down the front of his pants. Mr. King got Joel Nathanael Perez-Corea and asked him what he had in his hand. Joel Nathanael Perez-Corez showed Mr. King a small amount of Marijuana in a small plastic bag. Mr. King then contacted SRO Friday to come to

Officer Pastucka and your affiant arrived at the Redner's Quick Shoppe which is a local gas station. We were greeted inside the building by a Redner's employee (Ellen Zapolsky) who is a cashier for company. Ellen said she was at the register when a customer approached her and advised her of a the clear bag with suspected drugs on the floor. Ellen said she called for the Police to respond to retrieve the unknown item. She informed us that she did not touch the bag and left it where we first observed it when we entered. Officer Pastucka and your affiant observed the bag of substance on the floor in front of the

On 11/24/2015 at 12:15 P.M. Security Officer Zachery Smith notified Security Supervisor Brandon M Masser about finding paraphernalia. Officer Smith went out B-Building entrance for a cigarette break at approximately 12:10 A.M. smith found the paraphernalia inside of a Newport cigarette pack sitting on a plastic storage container. At 12:25 Safety Specialist Matthew Marsicano arrived at the control desk. Shortly after Marsicano arrived, Officer Smith brought the paraphernalia to the control desk. Officer Smith said the contents inside the cigarette pack smelled like Marijuana. Supervisor Masser put on latex gloves on and pulled the contents out of the cigarette pack. Officer Smith and Mr. Marsicano witnessed Masser observing the contents and

In the following investigation, the police department suspected that the suspects are members of a burglary ring. They had reasons to believe the suspects are linked to Mexico’s Sinaloa Drug Cartel.