Misconduct Summary

In this case the teacher should inform the head teacher about this incident and if may involve the police if necessary.

Recently, I witnessed a pupil at my setting using inappropriate language during a music lesson, where the class teacher was not present. I took the pupil to one side and bent to their level. I informed the pupil that the language they had used was both inappropriate and unacceptable. I told the pupil that I would be informing the class teacher of the incident and that should it happen again, I would be sending them straight to the head teacher’s office. Another child had overheard the inappropriate language and copied it. I took the same action with the second child, and then separated them, moving one child to the other side of the classroom. After the music lesson, I informed the class teacher of both incidents, who thanked me for my input and said that the pupils would need to be closely monitored for the rest of the day.

After I have found out information, I will talk to my supervisor about the abuse. My supervisor will help me follow the correct procedure of reporting abuse. I will report and record abuse and the report will state exactly what I saw, heard and been to told by the individual and any action I took, but i will not give any form of opinion or try to judge who is right or wrong and I will fill in a consent form if necessary including date, time and place.

Sympathy is an extension of empathic concern, or the perception, understanding, and reaction to the distress or need of another human being. Sympathy must be given and received in order for the world to operate because all humans make mistakes that impact other people’s lives. The Reprimand is a short “phone play” written by Jane Anderson in 2000. The two characters, Rhona and Mim, have a confrontation about what Rhona believes to be an inappropriate remark during a meeting. In The Reprimand, Mim deserves the most sympathy from the audience because Rhona intentionally manipulates her into believing she is not respected by her male co-workers.

In order to prove Thomas liable in this situation, there would have to be evidence of proximate cause (Essex, 2016). The student, or student’s family, would need to be able to prove that there is a relationship between the principal’s breach of duty, and the injury the student suffered (Essex, 2016). I have dedicated the remainder of this paragraph to describing the ways in which Thomas may be in breach of his duty. Thomas has the responsibility as the school principal to ensure that Homewood High School has highly qualified teachers. It is his responsibility to recommend to the board the person best suited for the

A male pointer crossbreed was found in a bin in Dundonald Street last April 15, Friday. He was so malnourished and badly dehydrated that he had to be put down after being rescued by Scottish SPCA officers.

At a public high school assembly of roughly 600 high school students, Matthew Fraser made a speech nominating a fellow student for elective office. Fraser had discussed the subject matter of his speech before the assembly to two teachers. Fraser’s teachers had informed Fraser that the speech should not be delivered because the speech was inappropriate and that it could lead to severe consequences. In his speech, Fraser used what some students believed was a graphic sexual image to promote the candidacy of Fraser’s friend. Bethel High School had a disciplinary code that enforced a rule prohibiting conduct that substantially interfered with the educational process

The investigations revealed that Mr. Smith failed to investigate any incidents that were reported by Ryan with regards to his being bullied. Mr. Smith told Mrs. Bright that he would personally handle this situation. If was revealed that one of the bullies was Mr. Bright’s distant cousin. Surveillance tapes were pulled from the time frame the bullying happened. Most of the reported bullying incidents were recorded on the cameras. It showed exactly what Ryan had reported to administrators. Ryan, through his parents, filed a lawsuit against Mr. Smith and the HCSD. The case went to trial and Ryan was awarded the sum of $45,000 for pain and suffering. Mr. Smith received a three day suspension and reassignment to another school within the district due to his negligence in the incident. Mrs. Bright was verbally reprimanded. She escaped further reprimands because her involvement in the case was minimal. Mrs. Bright told me that her intuition bothered her from the beginning. She stated she couldn’t put a finger on it. This was the first time she had been instructed by Mr. Smith not to investigate an incident. Usually, she was the one that initiated student bullying cases and then reported her findings to Mr. Smith. After detailing her

“I have been patient with the abuse but I just couldn’t cope. When she told me to leave her class I went straight home” said Khanyile. He has reported to GroundUp that the teacher has publicly shamed him, in the school’s cafeteria where she asked him if he had a penis or a vagina.

The first ethical dilemma states that a student is feeling sexually harassed by a teacher. She then states that she wants it to be over and that she doesn’t want to file a grievance report. My first feeling towards this scenario is that the student is obviously upset by the situation and the fact that she wants to leave it alone makes it harder to address. The Ethical standards that I think apply to the situation are as follows; Ethical Standard 3 and Ethical Standard 8 (Ethical Standards, 2016). I have chosen Ethical standard 3 because the client is being sexually harassed and the case manager must decide if the situation constitutes for a legal break in confidentiality or not. I chose Ethical Standard 8 because it is another standard that addresses client privacy (Ethical Standards, 2016). Standard 8 states that anything about the client to another colleague must be approved prior (Ethical Standards, 2016). My concern is definitely on what the client is feeling. She obviously doesn’t want to make a big deal about the situation but I am concerned that ignoring the harassment will make her situation even worse. Once

Within this scenario, Mark is a pre-service teacher that aspires to make an impact on his students’ lives. On this note, Mark builds a connection with a reclusive student named Laurel. This sparks controversy amongst the school community as Laurel insists that Mark is her ‘friend’ and begins to share inappropriate information with him. With good intentions, Mark does not want to diminish Laurel’s newfound confidence. Conversely, Mark is unsure of his professional responsibilities in this situation.

Teacher stated individual was hollering at her and the students, throwing things, and hitting on others.

This is when someone is forcing an individual to take part in sexual activities such as looking at, or in the production of, pornographic material, or encouraging them to behave in sexual activities, whether or not the individual is aware of what is

To address these situations administrators first need to know what it is. Sexual harassment is whenever one person makes unwanted sexual advances towards another, this includes both verbal and physical actions. In attempt to solve Hannah’s problem, the school should have educated the students on these problems and should provide suggestions on who to call for help. Hannah should have contacted an adult professional on ways to improve the situation, whether it be confronting

There are two major ethical theories which teachers should be aware of when determining the course of action regarding discipline, and other student affairs. There is the consequentialist theory, and the non-consequentialist. These ethical theories have been put to the test in the case study involving Ms. Jones (the teacher), Johnnie (the student) and, Mr. Pugnacious (Johnnie’s father). In the scenario described, Ms. Jones is having an ethical dilemma. She has witnessed Johnnie starting a fight with his classmates, and wishes to speak to his father regarding his behaviour. Mr. Pugnacious arrives to the meeting, belt in hand, and states his desire to “teach that brat to fight in school” while smelling of alcohol. To keep Johnnie from being hurt, Ms. Jones lies to Johnnie’s father and says it was not his son who started the fight and that he should not be punished. A teacher coming from a consequentialist standpoint is more likely to see the lie told by Ms. Jones as acceptable, because she was keeping her student out of harm’s way. A teacher coming from a non-consequentialist standpoint is more likely to believe the opposite, that lying to a parent is unacceptable and should be avoided. In this essay, I will analyze both the positive and negative effects of assuming each perspective, and finally will provide my own opinion about how the case should have been handled.