Missing And Exploited Child Case Study

Sex trafficking, particularly that of children, has become a growing concern in the United States over the past several decades (Kotrla, 2010). By definition, child sex trafficking is “when a child (under 18 years of age) is induced to perform a commercial sex act” (U.S., 2013, para. 4), and includes forms such as prostitution and pornography (Kotrla, 2010). Researchers suggest that children are the most vulnerable to becoming victims of prostitution (Kotrla), and it is estimated that there are at least 100,000 victims in the United States (Estes & Weiner, 2001). Sex traffickers, otherwise known as “pimps,” often lure children with promises of food, clothing, love, and shelter, and then the pimps manipulate the children to keep them in prostitution (U.S. Department of Justice [DOJ], 2015). Awareness of the issue has led to the development of organizations, such as Children of the Night, that seek to help victims escape the sex trafficking industry (Children of the Night [COTN], 2016d).

Have you ever walked into Wal-Mart and taken the time to look at the numerous pictures of missing youth that is plastered on the wall? When looking at how long they have been missing, it ranges anywhere from months to years. Looking at their age, both boys and girls, it is hard not to wonder if these kids are being trafficked. Child sex trafficking, also known as human trafficking, is a major issue that is not only plaguing the United States, but the world. Residing in a state where teen sex trafficking is very common, it is imperative that not only adults, but the youth understand what child sex/human trafficking is, what is a sex-trafficker, and the data that reveals the seriousness of child sex

According to National Center for Missing & Exploited Children who works with federal, state and local law enforcement: in 2015 there was more than 4.3 million reports of suspected child sexual exploitation calls receive through the Cyber Tipline. The National Center for Missing & Exploited Center also analyzed more than 139 million images and videos depicting apparent child pornography through the Child Victim Identification Program. The Child Victim Identification Program is the world’s largest database of child pornography that is maintained by the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the United States Department of Justice and the National Center for Missing Exploited Children. (National Center for Missing & Expolited Children, 2015)

About 250 to 300 AMBER Alerts are issued each year. To keep up with changing times AMBER Alerts are moving into the Web network. To be effective, more people need to be reached, and to do this the Internet is needed. The old system when it was activated could take up to an hour for all sources to be reached. In abduction, a rapid response can be crucial. With the new system, partly financed by Hewlett-Packard and other technical companies, one key password can send messages immediately. About thirteen states use this as part of their Alert system. Law enforcement enters

Over the course of this past year, body cameras are becoming increasingly popular with police officers in the United States. This is in response to the public’s outrage with unlawful police force. Recently, companies that manufacture such bodycams announced plans to include facial recognition software. The data collected from the cameras would be in the hands of the police for a minimum of 18 months, depending on the incident recorded (Chapman). While this could initially be seen as a positive method to identifying and arresting an active suspect, there is a question of privacy of control when it comes to this matter. This is an invasion of privacy for the citizens caught on camera that are not involved in an incident nor have a criminal record. These cameras are often worn during protests, both peaceful and not, capturing everyday citizens speaking their thoughts and ideas. A concern that exists is if the police will use the data collected from the cameras to unlawfully monitor participants (Chapman). This would inevitably discourage participation in these gatherings and take control from peaceful citizens and give too much control to police officers. There is also no guarantee that the footage will not be used for other purposes that the public is not yet aware of. “There is no U.S. federal law at the moment that directly protects the privacy of American citizens from the potential surveillance using facial recognition,” (Chapman). The fact that there is no balancing system for the rights of United States citizens may lead law enforcement to take advantage of their freedom and use the technology inappropriately and excessively. The development of this technology is growing so quickly that legislature has not accounted for the

The digital image of the face of a person can be matched against a record of other images by using face recognition software. In case that some of the images in the database go with the digitized image, the owner is reported about it by the system. Automatic face recognition has been studied and investigated extensively since 1990s and its usage is turning out to be no-nonsense in the present times. Although a number of automatic face recognition applications are relatively agreeable and harmless (access regulation to armaments, currency, illegal proof, nuclear equipment/supplies etc), there are still several dangers of face recognition systems that include violation of privacy and civil liberties, unrestrained exploitation, identity theft, illegal use of database, free access to personal data on social media etc. (Agre, 2001).

A non-family abduction occurs when a nonfamily perpetrator takes a child by using physical force, threat of bodily harm, or detaining the child for a substantial amount of time in an isolated location (Finkelhor, Hammer, & Sedlak, 2002). In 2002, 58,200 were estimated to have been abducted by a nonfamily perpetrator (Finkelhor, Hammer, & Sedlak, 2002). According to the FBI, there are four types of nonfamilial child abductors. The first type that the FBI identified is who we know as pedophiles. A pedophile can be defined as someone who is sexually attracted to young children (Dictionary, n.d.). They are also known to be the largest single category of child abductors (Burgess, Regehr, & Roberts, 2013). The second type identified is serial

I concur with you on the use of biometrics by the government, and especially facial recognition to apprehend criminals. The recent rise in criminal cases can be halted if such a system is deployed. Biometrics can never go wrong and is in fact one of the most accurate ways of identifying people. If the government can be able to launch a system that can capture personal specifications, it can be really helpful.

Developed in the 1960s, facial recognition technology has been used by the government and companies to identify people by matching them to photos. The data for this software was originally entered manually, limiting the scope of use. By 2001, the novelty of more powerful facial recognition technology grasped the public’s attention. During the January 2001 Super Bowl, surveillance cameras captured images to find people with a criminal record (FBI 2013). This potential invasion of privacy under the pretense of public safety sparked a public debate about what private information the government was allowed to take from us. So should we be putting limitations on the use of facial recognition software in America in order to keep

For 30 years, advocates, program administrators, and politicians have joined to encourage even more reports of suspected child abuse and neglect. Their efforts have been successful, with about three million cases of suspected child abuse having been reported in 1993. Large numbers of endangered children still go unreported, but a serious problem had developed: Upon investigation, as many as 65 percent or the reports now being made are determined to be "unsubstantiated", raising serious civil liberties concerns and placing a huge burden on investigative staffs.

It reasons that police cannot rely “solely” on facial recognition to make an arrest; however, this leaves a very dubious line regarding the extent of which they will rely on this software. Additionally, they argue that social media accounts will not be used in the database; however, they state that this will only be true during the pilot phase. This means that as the database becomes more widely used and exits the pilot phase, it will begin collecting more information about citizens not only in public, but also their personal lives and social media

Have you ever walked into Wal-Mart and taken the time to look at the numerous pictures of missing youth that is plastered on the wall? When looking at how long they have been missing, it ranges anywhere from months to years. Looking at their age, both boys and girls, it’s hard not to wonder if they have been kidnapped and are being trafficked. Child sex trafficking also known as human trafficking is a major issue that is not only plaguing the United States, but also the world. Residing in a state where teen sex trafficking is very common, it is imperative that not only adults, but youth as well understand what child sex/human trafficking is, what is a sex-trafficker, and data that displays how serious child sex trafficking is.

About 62% of girls who are brought into sex trafficking have a huge lack of a stable home life, and a large majority of these girls suffer from childhood sexual abuse, domestic violence at home, poverty, and running away lead to a much greater threat. About 374 girls have trafficked per day in Atlanta alone, and 100 juveniles per night. These girls have come from a difficult a background and need to feel safe in their lives. A vast majority of these girls have not felt loved and have felt endangered in their homes. On March 12, 2017, 168 girls were found in Texas, and only 117 of those girls were reported missing. The girls were all under that age of 18 and victims of sex trafficking. 95% of sex trafficking victims are uneducated not only in school but also about sex trafficking. Also, these girls are young, and a source says that 45% of the victims of sex trafficking have not received a substantial education past the 7th grade. These girls have not been taught about the warning signs of sex trafficking and how to defend themselves. In fact, many girls in America do not even understand the effects of sex trafficking. In the end, these girls are faced with a battle that most are not prepared for, but with assistance and education, they could become more

To what extent should governments and companies be using biometric information obtained from facial recognition technology for surveillance and convenience in identifying individuals in society? This article discusses the legislature that must be implemented to protect our right to privacy. We will reach a conclusion by further analyzing the benefits and the risks of the new technology, evaluating the privacy issues that accompany, and discussing faults in the

Child Find and Zero Reject. Under IDEA’s “child find” mandate, states are required to identify, locate, and evaluate all resident children with disabilities (including those who are homeless, limited English proficient, or wards of the state), regardless of the severity of their disability or whether they attend public or private schools. The mandate to serve all students with disabilities is commonly referred to as “zero reject.” Although federal law requires that children with disabilities be identified, it does not dictate how this is to occur. Nevertheless, courts give deference to districts when their identification efforts are substantial, in good faith, and ultimately effective. Consequently, state procedures vary widely and