Mississippi's Law Case Study

Well, my essay is about Mississippi. It’s a great place to be. There all kinds of events you can participate in. Blues music its part of Mississippi’s culture. This music comes from slaves in the fields, singing about their struggles, their conditions and their sorry. Many of the songs carried secret messages of escaping the plantation life. The music told of life experiences as slaves knew them. The stories sung about in their music went back before the Civil War and even to the western coast of Africa where men, women and children were captured and sold into slavery and brought to America as slave laborers to work in Southern plantations. The Mississippi Delta is considered to be the birthplace of the Blues, with

In the aftermath of the Supreme Court Case Obergefell v. Hodges (2015) which nationally legalized same sex marriage, the religious right has felt that protections on religious liberty in this country have gone under attack. As the LGBTQ+ movement gains more traction in mainstream media, local municipalities, and even state governments, many religiously conservative states legislatures have begun to fight back by passing laws that protect a person’s right to discriminate against the LGBTQ+ community because of religious objections. While a person’s right to abstain from participating in a business transaction concerning a same sex marriage has been widely debated (and continues to be widely debate) for some time now, the new anti-transgender

The controversy between marriage equality and the exercise of religious freedom is a confliction between nondiscrimination laws and religious freedom laws. Religious freedom seemed to be an important aspect of an American citizen, after all it is the very first amendment to the constitution. With each American citizen being granted equality by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, discrimination made against an individual based on his/her sexual preference may seem to violate this act. In history, religious organizations typically been immune from state and local laws prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation. However, with the cases of Obergefell v. Hodges and Kim Davis this stance is challenged.

The state of Mississippi just recently signed into law that allows businesses to deny service to gay couples. This bill called HB 1523 signed into law by Governor Phil Bryant is being called the religious freedom bill. The bill now signed into law has received major backlash from the entire United States during the almost two weeks that it has been enacted. The Governor has made statements saying that the bill was signed into law to protect religious beliefs and the convictions held by the individuals associated with private businesses and organizations. Many major organizations including the federal government have spoken up about this bill claiming to stop federal funding to not supporting that state by closing stores and businesses within the state. Nothing like this has ever been enacted in this country and the harsh attacks on the Governor and state of Mississippi have not stopped. Many LGBT organizations along with civil rights unions have called the bill discriminatory to the LGBT community in the state of Mississippi. The bill allows private businesses to withhold service from the gay community due to religious beliefs, which is from a moral standpoint wrong because sexual orientation is a part of a person that is instilled into someone and is on the same level as racial discrimination. Governor Phil Bryant and the state of Mississippi has no right to say that people should be allowed to be discriminated towards because of their sexual orientation it goes

There important things that were granted to Mississippi's African American population by the Black Codes but, there are also major restrictions of this legal code placed on Mississippi African Americans started with the Apprentice Law. This law has 10 sections that both grant but restrict Mississippi’s African American population. The first states that courts were authorized to apprentice the black children whose parents did not support nor provide for them, or orphans, even against their will, to an employer until the age of 21 for males and 18 for females. This first section does not necessary make blacks free from being apprenticed until they reach the required age. The second section states that the master or mistress is to protect the interest of their apprentice. This included their safety;

Mississippi lawmakers on Tuesday called for the repeal of a controversial new law that allows businesses to refuse service to gay people based on religious objection. Ellen DeGeneres called it "the definition of discrimination," while singer Bryan Adams canceled his upcoming show in the state to show his opposition to the law.” (Reilly, 2016). Misguided people are being driven by the nose by tricky "Christian" pioneers and legislators who have a personal stake in the matter of ensuring that their assemblies and their constituents remain profoundly and honestly perplexed of the myth of the "gay person plan." Know this: If the LGBTQ people group has any sort of motivation of all, it is achieving the same essential human rights that other people appreciates. That is all. That is the plan. Try not to fall for some other clarification of it. Gay people are not after your children. They are not attempting to change over you or change you. They are not worried with being comprehended as much as they are worried with being dealt with like some other person has the privilege to be dealt with. On the off chance that you trust that any gathering

Yes, each state should apply the Supreme Court ruling of Miller v. Alabama retroactively. There were two cases reviewed by the Supreme Court that determined their ruling. Evan Miller and his friend Colby Smith robbed, assaulted, and murdered Cole Cannon on July 15, 2003. Miller and Smith, age fourteen had been drinking and doing drugs the night the incident occurred. Miller and Cannon got into a fight over Miller stealing money from Cannon that lead to Miller repeatedly striking him with a baseball bat. After placing a sheet on Cannon and before striking him in the head for the last time, Miller states “I am God, I’ve come to take your life” (“Supreme Court”, 2011). To destroy the evidence, Miller and Smith set Cannon’s trailer on fire and left him to die.

Many other states have developed laws that protect individuals' religious freedoms, yet Indiana's law has more of a controversial front to its recent legislation. This action is to help court cases to decide whether a business owner was discriminating towards a customer or simply complying with the first amendment. Most have argued that this legislation discriminates towards sexuality; whereas, others believe they would be practicing their religious rights. Government and religion have crossed paths before, but this new bill overpasses a boundary that appeals intolerable. Furthermore, the causes of the new Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) is causing an uproar due to it's discriminatory presence and the future of this country's well-being

The state does not have sufficient support to suspend the licenses of Mr. Jones and Mr. Roberts.

The state of Mississippi has not passed many laws, which are named in honor of crime victims. A check of the state legislature’s web site, which shows the status of bills passed during each legislative session, shows that, since 2006, only three laws have been passed, which are named in honor of crime victims (Miss. Bill Status, 2016).

The Alabama law passed about prohibiting anyone who has had a sex reassignment surgery to be employed as a public school teacher is unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause. Since the law is classifying a group of individuals, transgender, this would fall under the test of heighted scrutiny. The law would not be tested under strict scrutiny because it is not a suspect classification of individuals such as race, nationality, color, or religion. Under the heighted scrutiny test the burden is on the government to show their intent of actions bears a substantial relationship important to a government interest.

There have been many cases over the years regarding people objecting to things based on their religious beliefs. By doing so, these people are sometimes in violation of federal or state laws that protect people’s rights and prevent discrimination. An example of this is when Bob Smith refused to rent out his banquet hall to Adam and Steve, a gay couple who wanted to get married there. Bob, a California resident, refused to rent out the banquet hall because Adam and Steve’s gay wedding went against his religious beliefs and he found their lifestyle to be immoral and ungodly. This case brings up several legal, moral and philosophical issues that will be discussed in the following paragraphs.

The goal of the Religious Liberty Accommodations Act is to provide everyone in Mississippi the same freedoms that are in our Constitution without the fear of being prosecuted for their religious beliefs. Therefore, I find that the Act is legal and I believe the goal of the Act are just and democratic because it does not mention discriminating against anyone. However, the LGBT community feels they will be targeted for discrimination under this law. This Act and many others like it has the country torn between doing what is socially acceptable and what is religiously acceptable, but professionally it is consistent with the values of the professional social work.

The Mississippi State Legislator along with the Governor are required to oversee the laws of the State of Mississippi. All citizens entrust they are doing everything to protect their well-being as it relates to the laws and regulations of the State of Mississippi. With so much controversy, regarding the confederate flag, lawmakers from the Senate and the House committee were asked to amend the laws. This caused misconceptions about the hanging of the flag, which led to a division among the citizens of Mississippi. According to Dreher (2016), “There are 16 flag-related bills before the House Rules Committee and three before the Senate Rule Committee. Some bills ask for commissions to change the flag or for a new flag design while other bills ask the Legislature to mandate that any public university, school or state agency fly the current state flag” (Dreher, 2016, p.1).

They also insisted the need for equality and no group or an individual should suffer social, administrative, or economic discrimination (Kenneth 24). They perceived the election as being about freedom, equality, and fairness. They based their argument on the grounds that America was founded on the principle of equal treatment, and the spirit should be maintained. They approached the issue on the proposition from a constitutional rights perspective and that members of the LGBT community had fundamental right to exercise love just like other people. They dismiss the claims that proposition 8 does not take their rights claiming that marriage is not equitable to a