Missouri Compromise Research Paper

The “Transcript of Missouri Compromise (1820)” is a written copy of the Missouri Compromise. The primary source is divided between eight different sections, with each section stating an agreed term for Missouri to accommodate with. Section one states that people who live in the area involved in the Missouri territory may create a constitution and state government that will be accepted in to the union. In section two it states the boundaries of the new state and the circumstances it must following with the jurisdiction of the boarding rivers. Section three states the voting and right to be voted for qualifications along with day in which one may be voted in according to counties. Section four states rules and regulations of representatives

The Missouri Compromise of 1820: The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was created by Henry Clay. This compromise would benefit both the Northern states and the Southern states. This compromise had occurred when the territory of Missouri wanted to become an official state. The only problem with this was that Missouri wanted to be a slave state.

Leading up to the Missouri Compromise, there was a strain on the anti vs pro slavery supporters across the country. This all started in 1819 when Missouri wanted to be admitted to the union as a slave state. This was very controversial since there was a delicate balance between the free and slave states and admitting Main as a slave state would cause an uproar of an anti-slavery states and supporters. The issue was settled with a two-section compromise. The northern part of Massachusetts then moved toward becoming a separate state which would be named Maine. Maine was then admitted to the union as a free state while Missouri was admitted as slave state keeping the balance with twelve free states and twelve slave states. Moreover, in addition

The incorporation of new eastern states into the United States made slavery a very slippery slope for national politics. In 1818 there were an even amount of states, eleven free and eleven slave states. In 1818 the state of Missouri which was a large slaveholding state petition for statehood to the Union due to its ever growing population. The northern states were in large opposition to this act for fear that the larger slave holding southern states would have too much power in the Senate and House of Representatives. The issue was that the constitution allowed states to count the

The Missouri Compromise was one of the great landmark episodes in a series of events that slowly led up to a fracturing of the northern and southern states which constitute the United States of America. Eventually, over time, and with the addition of other factors, this fracture would grow into the American Civil War. The Missouri compromise is not simply a bygone event, it is an important component of American history and it’s effects have altered the course of history. Had things gone differently the United States might have become a very different sort of place than it is today.

Now, after 14 years, Missouri was applying for statehood in the same territory that was being debated should have even been bought. However, he application proved to spark controversy of its own; according to the Northwest Ordinance, no territory who applied to join the Union could allow slavery, Missouri however had no law banning the ownership and use of slaves. The Union at first would not allow this, for if slavery were to expand into the other territories than the country would have no economic necessity for manufacturing. Slave states would then outnumber free states and have a larger input as to the political direction of the nation, resulting in presidential elections constantly being won by using the majority vote provided by the southern slave states. This is where the Missouri compromise came into play, the agreement decided that Missouri could be allowed to remain a slave state if slavery was banned from all territories applying for statehood above the parallel 36°30′ north, and Maine (formally part of Massachusetts) would be allowed as a free state. This was met with criticism as it meant that any states north of the parallel would not be able to use the fertile land they had for plantations, while also resulting in the ban of trading slaves between

Stephen A. Douglas would soon find the terms of the Missouri Compromise very inconvenient. As an advocate for western expansion, he proposed to design a trans-continental railroad across the northern plains, with an eastern terminance in Chicago. In order for his proposal to succeed, Douglas felt that the territories through which the railroad passed would have to be formally organized which required the support of southern politicians. He was also a believer in popular sovereignty; arguing that the status of slavery in a territory should be decided by it’s residents rather than Congress. He would then design a bill to kill two birds with one stone, the Kansas-Nebraska Act.

Research Task- Describe the role of the 1820 Missouri Compromise in the campaign against slavery!

The Missouri Compromise, written by Henry Clay, attempted to limit the slavery boundaries; it was later declared unconstitutional and is also considered one of many events that led to the American Civil War. The compromise became a precedent for settling subsequent North and South disagreements over slavery and duty issues, and it remained in effect until rescinded by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Missouri Compromise eased tensions between the North and the South delaying the civil war The American Civil War. However, it is also considered one of the causes of the civil war because it increased the division of beliefs between the North and SouthThus, the Missouri compromise played an important role in the

The Civil War, which lasted from 1861 to 1877, was mainly caused by the diverging society between the North and the South. The North and the South had different goals. There were many factors that led to the war and the chief ones were political and economic differences between the North and the South. The North’s aggression to control the South had led to the point where it was intolerable. The issue on slavery was one of the causes of the Civil War. Slavery and slave trades had become a big part of the South’s economy. The slaves were needed to work on plantations which helped the South prospered. During the 19th Century, the North worked hard on abolishing slavery, which they thought was a disgrace to the Union.

The Missouri Compromise was passed in 1820 to deal with the conflict of pro-slavery and anti-slavery. Slavery had been a political, economic issue. Which was causing a division between the North and the South. At the time, the United States contained twenty-two states evenly divided between slave and free. Missouri becoming a slave state and Maine as a free state. The North wanted Congress to stop slavery in general and expansion, on the other hand the South wanted slavery across the states. The Southerners viewed slave labor to be essential to their economic. Additionally, a law was passed where Louisiana purchase territory North of the 36 degrees and 30 minutes’ latitude, where any future state North would not be allowed to own or

The Missouri Compromise was a temporary solution to the issue of slavery and territorial rights such as the movement West. Two areas of land wanted to become states in 1820, known as Maine and Missouri. Maine wanted to enter as a free state with no slavery as everyone in that area was against it and wanted it abolished. Missouri wanted to enter as a slave state and was all for slavery and wanted it to be spread all throughout the country. The compromise everyone came into conclusion with, was that there would be no slavery allowed north of 36° 30’ latitude. This angered the Southerners because their intention was to promote slavery not have it abolished. They realized that this compromise threatened the balance between free and slave states; Maine and Missouri. In order to expand slavery, the South felt that the United States would need territory from Mexico. The only area of land left was in Arkansas and that line became known as the Missouri Compromise line. The impact that the Missouri Compromise had on the United States was tremendous and had many effects on issues such as national politics, the institution of slavery, and the overall togetherness of the nation as a whole.

Although the aftereffects of the era of good feelings dominated the beginning of the time period and compromises were at first effective, sectionalism over national subjects, especially slavery, led to a crisis in which compromises often meant more increase in political tensions. (Doc F) Sectionalism abruptly increased in the 1820 and 1830's with The Missouri Compromise and the Tallmadge Amendment. Tallmadge's radical proposition was that Missouri gradually emancipated its slaves and prohibit slavery in the rest of the Louisiana Purchase which produced raging political debates. If Missouri went either as a slave state or free state, the precarious balance of eleven to eleven states in the senate would be upset. The compromise

Through out the history of America, there were many compromises made as a desperate attempt to make both groups of people of either side happy as much as they could. In this case, the United States tried to avoid war with a series of political compromises in an attempt to reduce sectional tensions between the North and South, which proved to be ineffective.

At the time, the United States contained twenty-two states, evenly divided between slave and free. In the years leading up to the Missouri Compromise of 1820, tensions began to rise between proslavery and antislavery factions within the U.S. Congress and across the country. They reached a boiling point after Missouri’s 1819 request for admission to the Union as a slave state, which threatened to upset the delicate balance between slave states and free states. To keep the peace, Congress came up with a two-part compromise, granting Missouri’s request but also admitting Maine as a free state. It also passed an amendment that drew an imaginary line across the former Louisiana Territory, establishing a boundary between free and slave regions that remained the law of the land until it was repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854.