Modern Day Zoos Research Paper

The exhibits are also very fascinating, and after going to the zoo you can catch a glimpse of a certain animal's way of life. Without zoos we wouldn't have the unbelievable experience of seeing Earth's most beautiful life forms. Zoos keep endangered species safe, and out of harms way. We need to start caring about the life forms on this planet. Showing each animal compassion, and love. My knowledge on zoos has been stretched after my reading analysis today. Based off of the articles, "The Stripes Will Survive", "The Zoos Go Wild", and "Our Beautiful Macaws and Why They Need Enrichment", we can truly get in-depth analysis about the role zoo's

Zoos are often the best hope or even last hope for the survival of a species, especially if they are

To begin with, zoos are the safest place for the poor creatures as they are taken care well and their holistic needs are met at the time of necessity. For example, animals can be treated well in case of medical needs and they will enjoy not only freedom of life but also quality of life by experiencing all the facilities. In this way , zoos

Many people believe that the zoo is a positive experience, but they are not aware of what happens behind the scenes. Animals cannot physically live in zoos due to the unnatural habitats. These man-made habitats, often cause animals to suffer due to their physical and mental needs not being met (Zoos). Most animals are put into tight and filthy cages that often cause them to go insane. Some of these animals resort to destroying themselves by chewing on their body or by pulling out their hair (Zoos and Other…). “Lions in zoos spend 48% of their time pacing, a recognized sign of behavioral problems” (Ten Facts…). No animal should have to spend their life stressing about their wellbeing. They shouldn’t have to worry about their cage not being clean, or whether they’ll make it another day. No species on this planet should have to endure the physical and mental pain that animals, held captive in zoos, have to go

Zoos are first and foremost for people not animals. Zoos exist to serve the human gaze though they portray themselves as the arks of the animal kingdom, safeguarding the future of biodiversity. And it is true that many zoos do have conservation, breeding, and reintroduction programs, which are certainly noble projects. But what about the rest of the animals that are not endangered? At the National Zoo, only one in five of the animals

Being placed in a zoo can dramatically help endangered animals receive the care that they need which may not be accessible in the wild. In William Dudley’s Animal Rights, author John Ironmonger was quoted as saying, “Certainly, zoo animals do tend to live longer lives, to feed better, and to suffer from fewer parasites or diseases. They live without fear of predation; they live without famine” (72-73). His quote supports the argument that endangered animals are provided for in captivity. In the wild, animals under threat of extinction fear starvation, poachers, disease, and predators. Placing these animals in zoos can give them rehabilitation and a perseverance of their lives. Another author, Kevin Hile, supports the claim that endangered animals are preserved in zoos by discussing the evolution of zoos. When zoos first started, they were merely used to bring in revenue. Now, zoos play a role in helping save endangered animals from extinction (Hile 133). Zoos

According to an article form Doris Linn, an animal rights expert, for About News; zoos do provide some benefits keeping animals in captivity. A good zoo delivers excellent animal care with exception enclosures with plenty of room for the animals.

Some animal containment facilities are solely designed to rehabilitate injured animals and prepare them to be released back into the wild. Zoos on the other hand are only meant for people's entertainment. The animals in zoos are not being prepared to be sent back into the wild. Zoos are filled with animals which are not often seen by the population surrounding the zoo. Rather than keep endangered species in the zoos more widely covered animals are placed in zoos to draw crowds. “Zoos find themselves in a bind. In order to maintain this popularity—and income—they have to cram in as many charismatic, big-draw species as possible into a limited space. This commercial need can clash with the desire to recreate natural environments and can even, as studies have shown, diminish the actual proportion of endangered species under their care.” (Sanctuaries or Showbiz: What's the Future of Zoos?). Zoos need to focus on rehabilitation and protecting endangered wildlife. Instead of just being a major tourist trap zoos should focus on saving endangered animals. “"If you wanted to design a zoo for conservation, that would be very different from an entertainment zoo," said Ben Minteer, an ethicist at Arizona State University. "A lot of zoos are making a hard pivot to conservation but there's a tension there.” (Sanctuaries or Showbiz: What's the Future of Zoos?). The current idea of zoos needs to be

Zoos also help scientist obtain their research about certain animal species. With zoos, scientist are able to gather an animal's information such as their behavior, breeding intervals, and their diets. Scientist are able to apply this information to their studies and can learn about the animals. Their studies may lead them to figure out items such as diseases and genetics to help keep the animal's species stable and upstanding. To wrap this up, research in zoos helps a large amount. Without zoos, there would be several more animal species that have gone endangered or even

In addition, many zoos and wildlife parks have breeding programmes to increase the population of endangered species, which would not be as likely in the wild. Breeding while confined in a zoo as opposed to loosing a species all together seems to be the lesser of two evils, and comes out with a more positive outcome of increasing the population of an endangered species to hopefully remove them from the endangered species list. As briefly touched on before, animal captivity prevents poaching, which is

According to the text “The Impact of Animal Protection”, many places that animals live humans have made the animals very sick because of pollution. Being in a zoo would meant that there would be no pollution and the animals would be healthier. If an animal in a zoo gets sick or hurt the zookeepers are going to treat it until is is back and in its best state of health. Yes, animals are in what can be small spaces which can cause a negative impact on their behavior and health, but animals should be kept in zoos to help maintain their health.

The opponents to the topic, on the other hand, believe that we should not have zoos because the zoo workers separate the animals from their natural environment and keep them in a smaller den. To support their argument, the opponents point out to the protection of the animals they could’ve got by staying in their natural habit. However, since most of the animals can’t get the medication they need, most of these species are close to extinction, and they could be poached or hunted at any second, the argument has error and the opponents are wrong. Zoo workers and animal experts say that the safety and the future of the animal species depend on us. Therefore, the zoos can take care of the animals with utmost care and provide the animals the safety that they need to get. Now is the perfect opportunity to help save the animals and protect them with the care they need. This is the only time we can protect the animals from them dying out. After all, aren’t the lives of the animals just as important as our

How would you feel if you were captured and placed in a confined enclosure? I don't think you would like that, would you. The history of zoos began 3000 years ago in ancient Egypt, when pharaohs would demand wild animals to be captured for their amusement. Yet today zoos still confine wild animals which is cruel. This is cruel because they keep animals in enclosures that aren't the same as the animals natural habitat, creates stress behavior, and is just a collection of unhappy animals. So although zoos have become a huge part of the American culture, in the eyes of animals, these establishments are cruel, stressful, and don't provide the animals with their natural habitat, and therefore I believe that zoos should not catch and confine wild animals.

On average about 175 million people visit a zoo per year. However, the majority of these people fail to notice a relative issue that is lying in front of their faces. That these animals within these zoos are suffering every day from mistreatment and abuse. Most of the society ignores the many factors that are displayed out in front of them every time they enter a zoo. Instead, society focuses in on issues that are happening right now, the issues that draw out the media and are on the cover of every newspaper. However, these animals facing this mistreatment are relevant and do impact society. Every time an animal is taken from the wild and placed in the captivity of a zoo it impacts the mental health of the animal and endangers everyone and everything around it. Zoos are to blame for this endangerment, yet so is the public for overlooking mistreatment such as an early death in animals, mental illness, and being imported illegally from the wild.

While an argument can be made that certain zoos are not equipped to house specific animals and need to further their efforts in providing a proper substitute for their natural habitat. It can also be said that some causes of distress or even death cannot be controlled due to the region in which the zoo is located, and the species of animal they house. The efforts made by places like Amboseli Park and the Smithsonian Conservation Biology Department are a glimpse of hope for conservation and the steps that are being made to spread and enlarge the efforts to conserve the planets wild life whether on the brink of extinction or otherwise. Throughout the studies that were researched a definitive answer still never came clear, zoos can seem like they are causing harm by confining these wild animals, and in some cases, that’s true, but they are also valuable tools in educating the public and breeding animals that may not have a fighting chance in the wild. The ethical grey area in this debate can only be further defined in more elaborate studies and in outweighing the damage caused to the aide given in wide varieties of zoos around the