preview

Moffitt's Dual Taxonomy Of Antisocial Behavior

Decent Essays
There are many criminological theories upon why offenders prevent and deter themselves from offending. By that, this essay focuses upon the most well established theories of the relationship between crime and age. Moffitt’s ‘Dual taxonomy of antisocial behaviour’ theory (1993) and Sampson and Laub’s ‘Age-graded theory of informal social control’ (1992; 1993; 2003). This will address the framework and the main assumptions of these theories. Subsequently, both theories are equaled, the differences and similarities, in an approach respecting the analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of both the first one when opposed with the last linking to the desistance process and referencing to empirical research throughout. Moffitt’s (1993) has assembled…show more content…
Hence the reason that it is the vital factor in “understanding the link between adolescent delinquency and adult criminality” (Newburn, p.869). The theory concentrates on the whole life-course but emphasizing on change rather continuity but again still looking on continuity and stability. Therefore, consequence on the given life event and their impact on the offender life to decide its (dis)-continuity (Laub, et al., 2006), which is demonstrated by their notion of turning point “the point at which a very significant change occurs; a decisive moment” as the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language defines it, taken from (American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language 2016). It is usually an event or life occurrence that has turned the individual out of the criminal regime into a more conservative form of behaviour. The three mechanisms of the turning point are; Supervision and monitoring, such as having a job, therefore a manager overseeing everything they did or a good marriage with a non-delinquent partner. The second mechanism being the change and structure routine activities thus no time to be a criminal. The last turning point is the opportunity for identity transformation, meaning something on the lines of being a good employer or partner. These can give a place to adjust in the offender life path, either…show more content…
Moffit’s taxonomy (1993) lacks a fundamental concept that would be a clarifying of rebellious behaviour (Farrington, 2006). Consequently presents her theory with numerous notions that influences that particular behaviour as the “neuropsychology deficits” for the life-course-persistent and the “maturity gap” for the Adolescences-limited (Moffitt, 1993). Thus, these findings are in need of different theoretical expectations. On the other hand, Sampson and Laub propose an exceptional framework to enlighten antisocial behaviour, focusing on all behavioural manifestations (Farrington, 2006) and not two classes of offenders as Moffitt theory models. “If no underlying construct is proposed, it seems likely that a more complex theory might be needed involving different factors influencing different types of antisocial behaviour” words from Farrington (2006, p.345) clarification of some implications of Moffitt taxonomy theory. Even though there are many critics to the theory, Moffitt has an extremely detailed theory with solid features and aspects with predictions for each group of offenders, thus her to achieve a significant level (Sampson and Laub, 2005). According to Moffitt some individuals are presumed to be fated to a life of antisocial behaviour with practically no escape and not evidently supported by any empirical evidence.
Get Access