Mongols Barbaric Dbq Essay

In the book Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World, by Jack Weatherford Genghis Khan and his men are portrayed as ruthless barbarians. Evidence in the book shows that he wasn’t a barbaric man. He was known for doing so ruthless things, but when it comes down to the facts of what really happened he was actually not barbaric he was protecting what he felt was right. The way he ran his military, how his politics was set up, and how women were treated all were reason he is not barbaric.

One reason that the Mongols were not barbaric was because within their civilization, the Mongols cared about and protected their people. There is many pieces of evidence that support this statement. One of them is when the text says, “The town is surrounded by a mud wall and has four gates.” (Document E) Providing their people with a wall and gates helped keep the people safe. This shows that they wanted to protect their people and were kind, caring people. As said in the first paragraph, a

The Mongols were seen as savage people who were good for nothing but destruction, many referred to them as "barbarians". A condescending

According to Document’s 4 data, around 9 million deaths occurred. However, it wasn't just how many, but how the Mongols punished their enemies. Genghis Khan’s large army, would contain brilliant strategies in warfare, but would use it for cruel acts. According to Document 3, during battles, they would burn the fat of their enemies ( if napalm wasn’t present ) and shoot them in catapults, setting inextinguishable fire to the civilizations. As shown in Document 5, the Mongols enemies would have their heads buried for punishment. Murdering women and children, as well as enslaving and decapitating their enemies, the Mongolian Empire had no remorse. Though the civilization had moral codes and peace in the nation, the Mongols seemed contradicting, due to the harshness, the power

Despite however civilized some thought the Mongols were, they were barbaric for three distinct reasons: they used psychological warfare to manipulate the minds of their enemies; even worse, they caused mass destruction to many cities/countries in the Eastern Hemisphere during leader Genghis Khan’s rule; however, most catastrophic of all, they killed about 40 million people throughout their reign (Andrei). According to the online dictionary, barbaric can be defined as savagely cruel and/or exceedingly brutal. If destroying innocent people’s homes and killing tens of millions of people is not barbaric, nothing is.

Throughout the 13th century, the Mongols showed the world how barbaric they actually were. To other groups of people, they were known as cruel, very violent, barbaric and people who definitely lived far from what was considered as a “civilized world.” People thought of barbaric as a negative term referring to people who lived beyond the reach of civilization, people who were savage, evil according to the background essay. The Mongols could be expressed as one of the most barbaric groups out there because they revealed their violence by causing death, destruction, and the downfall of all the land that they had conquered.

The Mongols were able to conquer so much land because they had good tactics. They have a language that lets them relay messages to horses awaiting their demand and draw battle lines with captives in the front when they fight. If one man runs away, ten men are killed. (Doc 2, 3, 8) The Mongols taught discipline in such a barbaric way that all of the troops always obeyed rules. They were very barbaric because they made their captives and prisoners the front line in their battles. The captives

They killed them just like they killed and treated men and soldiers. I believe the mongols are barbaric because they have violent morals, kill innocent, and conquer over and over with no reason or purpose. First of all they have very violent morals, for example in document two it says, “ if one or two or three or even more out of a group of ten run away, all are put to death: and if a whole group of ten flees, the rest of the group of one hundred are ALL put to death”. This shows that they believe that if you run from battle that you do not deserve to live. As a punishment they would kill the people that depended on you so you carry that burden.

One way reason the Mongols should be considered civilized is because of their organized army. The Mongol army was separated into units, the smallest one being a group of ten men including one leader or captain (Doc 2). The other units of one hundred, one thousand, and ten thousand were arranged in a similar fashion with one leader over a certain number of men (Doc 2). Over them were two to three chiefs in command of the entire army, one of them having complete control over the army (Doc 2). In addition to this, the Mongols were very loyal to their leader and this would help maintain the organization in the army. One of the advantages of having this organization was that the soldiers were able to turn to their captains if there was an emergency because they were always close by(OI). Because of the small divisions of the soldiers, the Mongols could send units out to spy and gather information on the enemy and the terrain(OI). Combining their new information and their battle tactics, they were able to conquer many lands and quickly amassed an empire with a size unmatched by any country or people (Doc 1). The Mongols should be seen as civilized because they

Third, the Mongols had a very organized military structure which also provided a good social structure, since the Mongol’s lifestyles revolved around their warriors. The Mongol warriors held a ruthless mindset which aided in their rapid expansion. Chingis Khan’s subordinate Jebe killed the retreating soldiers of Cathay, and Jurchin and Khara Khitan fighters “slaughtering them…so that their bodies lay piled up like rotten logs” (Doc 1). Chinggis Khan completely wiped out the entire tribe of Tangqut people who rebelled against him (Doc 7). The Mongols did not discriminate based on religion, nor did they spare any based on sex or age (Doc 8).

What do you think when you hear the word barbaric? When you hear it you most likely think of someone who is overpowering, reckless, and someone who is an example of savagery. The Barbarians were a perfect example of barbaric and were known for being savage and evil. The ancient greeks used the word barbarous for the name of any foreigner. But the small grassland tribe quickly changed the meaning while conquering “most of Asia, the middle east, and eastern europe”. While their “reach extended from Korea to Poland, and from Vietnam to Syria” stated in The Mongols: How Barbaric Were The “Barbarians”. The Mongols way of ruling nations was overall brutal and made them one of the most known tribes for savagery.

Long ago, during the dark days of mankind, rulers rose up and formed empires based on personal desires and their conquest of the nations around them. Like everything in the world they eventually came to an end, but one of the most spectacularly to exist where the Mongol Empire. The Mongols themselves were known as a nomadic group who lived in the vast open grasslands of Eurasia and fierce warriors known for their battles skills and ability to survive. The Mongols, founding of the empire, and Genghis Khan's early days and his reason for creating the empire are well known throughout history. Like all other empires, the Mongols left lasting impacts on the world and proved their historical significance though whether it’s good or bad depends

This tactic wouldn’t seem barbaric if the Mongols hadn’t killed every last man, woman, and child. Anybody they thought weren't worth taking were slaughtered; with the exception of a few people they

How Barbaric Were the Barbarians? When it comes to world conquering, the Mongols were the best. In the grasslands of Central Asia during the 13th century the mongol Empire rose too overwhelming power under the rule of Genghis Khan. Genghis Khan, which translates to “Universal Ruler,” united the Mongol clans under one leadership and then proceeded to conquer much of the known world. There is no doubt that they were barbaric, but when you put put all of the good and bad the Mongols did on a scale, which way would it tip?

The Mongols were people I wouldn’t want to come across. They were very brutal with their killings of the innocent, the way they conquered countries and cities and their way of life. The peace was kept between Mongols. Genghis Khan and Khwarazm had a peace treaty keeping them in peace. Although it was peaceful, that doesn’t mean it can’t be broken. A Mongol caravan entered Khwarazm with 150 people from Mongolia, and they were all murdered. Genghis Khan wasn’t too thrilled to hear about what had happened in fact, he decided to break out a war. In result, cities fell, more people murdered than killed before outbreak, and Persian casualties were higher than ever. Genghis Khan didn’t stop the attempts at trying to conquer other cities or countries, however. Genghis Khan wanted to make the Mongol empire as big as he could so he went on and next, attacked the West such as