Monsters = Homosexual

In reality these old convictions that is the heteronormative society believe is unjust. Homosexual couple can raise a child same as heterosexual couples can. According to Judd Legum “finds that kids raised by

Arguments for gay and lesbian families is a concern for the sanctity of marriage is often accompanied by a discomfort with the idea of gay and lesbian families, based on misinformation about the quality of those relationships and their impact on children (Kimmel 184). Arguments that support gay and lesbian families are mainly focused on having the same equal rights as heterosexuals. Many gay and lesbian couples want to get married because of the benefits they acquire such as the right to inherit from a spouse who dies without a will, the right to consult with doctors and make crucial decisions (Kimmel 184). A meta analysis of social studies of gay and lesbian parenting suggests that children are more accepting of homosexuality and maybe more likely to indicate a willingness to consider homosexual relationships themselves (Kimmel 186). Another great example is daughters of lesbian and gay parents are more assertive, confident, and ambitious, and sons are less conforming to traditional masculine aggression and domination and have a better understanding of their gender identity (Kimmel

P.1. In “Monsters and the Moral Imagination” Stephen Asman believes monsters are lurking everywhere. But some fear of monsters are long gone past our times, but believes that monsters can send us fear instead of physical harm, and why do we call monsters, monsters if they're not real. But does believe that monsters have been on the rise over time. The rise of monsters could be tragedies that have happened in real life like 9/11 and believes that stress and trauma could be a huge role in the growth of monsters.

Many people are close minded and think the only acceptable home is one with a mother and a father that are married to each other, they may think that children need a mother and father for proper male and female role models, or even children raised by gay parents are more likely to be gay themselves. Whether you believe this to be true or not, the children that need to be adopted do not have parents at all. While many may say that being in foster care is better than being adopted by a homosexual family that is not true. Not all foster care families are warm and fuzzy. In many cases, foster families will abuse the children or take the money given to them by the state for the children and use it for themselves. And over the matter of whether they turn gay or not, isn’t it better for them to have families and homes than that they stay in foster care until they are lucky and a couple adopts them or until they turn 18 and are forced out of foster

As everyone knows that men are objective, unemotional, and inarticulate. Yet men formed friendships and they usually have larger friendship groups than women, their way to ‘connect’ with each other is impersonally and unemotionally. This result in a much more realistic view of Homosociality in Men's Talk. Men does not like women that chat and exchange ideas often due to gender difference which men and women has naturally difference in biology and behavior. Men are to normatively want (and need) to do things with groups of other men exclusive of women. Man are too dominancy which means they has masculinity with dominance or authority; to be a man is to be strong, authoritative, and in control. However, when personal feelings (friend love) transforms into special feelings (homosexual love), the difference of morality between human has decided they admit to be a gay or not. Implicit in the belief that extraordinary friendship is the base foundation of homosexual

Hi Constance, this appears to be a straw man argument, or an argument to refute an argument not advanced by an opponent. In other words, is the feeling you’ve failed as a parent because you have a gay child really that prevalent in our society? Personally, I don’t know because I don’t have a gay child, but my intuition tells me I would feel disappointed; not for me, but for my child because their life might be more difficult since it’s outside the norm. Moreover, I assume this is probably the more common reaction, versus a feeling of guilt (i.e. codependence), which is an understandable sentiment. Having several close gay friends throughout my life, I’ve never understood why people are so sensitive about it. It doesn’t bother me in any way

I think the monsters in our society today are the people who kidnap kids. Its so sad to think that some people out there want to abduct children from their families. I don't know what they get out of this or why their intentions are this way. It hurts the family more than anything. Not knowing if your kid is still alive or where they are or whats happening to them. Walking into a store and seeing all the missing child pictures on the wall break my heart. This is why I believe that people who kidnap children are the biggest monsters in todays

Monsters have been the stars of entertainment for the horror industry. The word "monster" usually connotes something wrong or evil; a freak of nature. Traditionally, monster narratives to depict the monster a hideous creature that may produce fear or panic. However; can this still apply to present day? Monsters have completely revolutionized. For example, Vampires have traditionally been categorized as evil, seductive and alluring creatures of the night. They moved through the night, hiding in shadows, and sleeping in coffins throughout the day. Yet, the modern vampire is far from this. Just like Vampires, Zombies have also have steadily gone through a complete shift of social compliance. In early monster narratives, zombies were traditionally reanimated corpse who were under the control of a Voodoo master. In the past decade there has been a zombie boom; with zombies being able to adapt to the social preference. Although vampires and zombies have changed in cinema and literature since their very creation, the most dramatic changes have occurred through the late twentieth century to modern day, mainly due to social tolerance and social anxiety.

In Frankenstein by Mary Shelley I think the monster is a fiend. In the book the monster fantasizes about killing and war and even compares himself to the Devil/ Fallen angel. He killed out of spite and anger. For example when he was in a field he saw a young boy and went to take him so that he could have a friend.

Adoption is about finding families for children, it is not about finding children for families (Joyce, 2015). Homosexual people are same as regular people, they wish to have regular families just like anyone. However, why homosexual couples are not allowed to adopted children since they are same as anyone else? In 1851, the first adoption law passed at Massachusetts, North American (Herman, 2012). The adoption of the Massachusetts Children Act 1851 is an important point to give authorizations to judges in validating parents who want to adopt (Herman, 2012). According to the (SOS Children's Village, 2015), there are about 120,000 children being abandon in America per year. Depending on (Regnerus, 2012) past research paper, stated that homosexual

The main concern that homosexual parents worry about is their child or children being teased, or hiding facts about their parents to avoid being bullied (Meezan 103). I recently read an article from ABC News and in the article a married homosexual couple was shocked that they are not allowed to adopt a child. They were told that in order to adopt only one parent can be listed on the birth certificate. They feel that the laws that are aimed at the adults are hurting the children who really need homes (James).

Gay parents are facing discrimination because of their sexual orientation. Twenty-two states currently allow single gays to adopt and 21 states currently allow gay and lesbian couples to adopt in the U.S. (Mallon, 2007, p. 6). The ability of gay couples to rear a child should not be denied only because they are gay. Homosexuals may be looked down upon by society, but they still are humans and have morals. These morals they possess, may influence a child more than those morals taught to a child with heterosexual parents. All over the world, children suffer in families consisting of alcoholics, drug abusers, and sexual abusers (Powell, 2007, p.1). It is not possible that these environments are safer than what would be provided by homosexual

these are not monsters. I didn’t see no monsters here. these feel like love, and opportunity's, like something missing being found. Because how could a monster make such pretty girls?

Since the early 1900s, homosexual people have become increasingly popular and greatly resisted. People that are homosexual face barriers placed upon them by the political system and society. Due to these challenges, homosexuals fought to have the same marital and parental rights as heterosexual people. Same-sex adoption is not prohibited in most states in the United States of America and many places worldwide. Family is not determined solely on blood relations and should be legalized in all parts of the world; because homosexual parents are just as good as heterosexual parents, if not better, and can provide an enriching second chance for many children waiting to be adopted.

Nowadays, the question of gay marriage is one of the most heated and controversial. Over the years, same-sex couples are fighting for the legal recognition for their marriages and their right as parents. Parenthood is one of the most valuable experiences in a human life. After finding a partner, it is natural for people to want to raise children. Homosexual parent are the same in ability and commitment to raised healthy children. It would be a big step for improvement in our society to provide necessary support and rights for same-sex couples and their children.