preview

Montresor's Murder

Good Essays
Open Document

Writing about murder is certainly a strong suite of author Edgar Allen Poe, but no short story of his does it better that “The Cask of Amontillado”. In Susan Amper’s essay “How to Write about “The Cask of Amontillado” she states that it is believed by many critics to be “Poe’s finest tale” (par. 1). The story is about a methodically chilling murder carried out by the main character whose goal is to “… not only punish but punish with impunity” (179). Montresor leads his friend, Fortunato, into the catacombs with the lure of expensive wine and the plan to kill him. With the irresistible allure of an expensive case of wine Montresor carries out his long-awaited revenge. Poe adds depth to his story by not revealing to his readers just what pushed …show more content…

Montresor uses a very specific word in the beginning when detailing his ides of revenge. To describe what means success Montresor uses the word “impunity” (179). So, this lets the reader know that the only way for this to be counted as a win he needs to also get off scotch free. But the second to last line he gloats that “for the half of a century no mortal has disturbed them.” (184). To this Pitman says that the whole story comes off as “confessional in nature” and that makes it “immensely ironic” (325-326). The fact that Montresor is explaining how he did this means he is opening the door to be punished for it which would inevitably cancel out his revenge. This is not the only place though where irony in his revenge plan can be found. Montresor’s last stipulation is that it is also very important for that the “avenger” lets his victim know what it is he has done to earn this fate (179). In his essay Randall states that “the redress must be personal.” as is customary in Italian code (302). Though he again fails as Fortunato dies long before Montresor intends him to. When Montresor throw’s the fire into the hole all he gets in response is a slight “jingle of the bells” (183). If Fortunato was still alive the act of a flame falling on him would have gotten a much louder response. Montresor knew it would take time for Fortunato to decipher why this has been done to him which is why Montresor picked the slow death of burying him alive. Like Jacoby states “Montresor chose the method of slow suffocation, suggest that Montresor did not expect Fortunato to die so quickly” (343). So, the irony lies in the fact that because of Fortunato’s earlier than planned demise, the revenge can not be checked as a

Get Access