Moot Court Problem

8010 Words33 Pages
MOOT COURT PROBLEM 172109831117 IN THE HONOURABLE MOOT COURT/HIGH COURT OF A.P UNDER APPELLETE JURISDICTION (CIVIL APPEAL NO: 2012) BETWEEN: SUJATHA---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------APPELLENT AND SHEKAR----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------RESPONDENT ON THE SUBMISSION…show more content…
Payal Sharma Vs Superintendent, Nari Niketan 5. Abhijit Bhikaseth Auti v. State Of Maharashtra and Others 6. Dwarika Prasad Satpathy V/s Bidyut Prava Dist 7. CHANMUNIYA Vs VIRENDRA KUMAR SINGH KUSHWAHA 8. Reema Agarwal v. Anupam A.I.R. 2004 S.C. 1418 9. Bharata Matha & Ors v. R. Vijaya Renganathan & Ors. 10. Madan Mohan Singh & Ors v. Rajni Kant & Anr 11. S.P.S Balasubramanyam Vs Suruthaya 12. Andali Padayachi and Ors. 13. D. Veluswami v. D. Patchaimmal 14. Koppisetti Subbharao Subramaniam v. State of A.P 15. Laxmi Mandal vs Deen Dayal Hari Nager Hospital & Ors W.P. 8853/2008 16. Jaitun v Maternity Home, MCD, Jangpura & Ors W.P. No. 10700/2009 17. Alok Kumar v. State & Anr STATEMENET OF JURIDSICTION The appellant has appealed the honourable Moot court filed under sec 96 of C.P.C R/W SEC 19 OF FAMILY COURTS ACTS 1984. CASE FACTS: Shekar and Sujatha are related to each other living in the district Mahanagar. They were classmates of the same branch in the college. Apart from the relationship they shared they were very good friends also. During the final year studies in the campus selections conducted both of them were selected for a placement by the same company in Hyderabad, at Hyderabad InfoTech with a handsome salary. They shifted to Hyderabad to join the job. They
Open Document