Moral Dilemmas: Course Analysis

Ethical systems are complex and difficult to determine what one best describes a person’s individual belief systems. After review of the textbook, I believe that I best subscribe to the ethical system of graded absolutism. This posting will provide a brief defense of my personal ethical systems beliefs as well relevant examples to support it. Hicks and Hicks (2014) describe graded absolutism as, “In this ethical system, one is obligated to follow a higher moral law. If there are two laws that conflict with each other morally, the one that is higher should be chosen.” (p. 111). This view accepts that as humans we are forced to make decisions that might require compromise within our own moral systems as part of decision-making. Choosing

When working in a health or social care setting professional practitioners are very often with situations involving moral dilemmas. Therefore it is important for the health, care and social workers to understand morality and the meaning of moral decisions and how they are linked to the practice of heath and social care.

Now, let's see how learning about the Four Ethical Lenses and a simple method for decision-making can help you resolve a typical ethical dilemma. Ready?

The following will describe an ethical issue in my own area of study as well as provide a moral response. It will be inclusive of two moral theories might respond to the issue and provide an explanation of how the principles contained in a code of ethics for my discipline relate to the issue.

Many perspectives can be taken when considering what fair is. As with most things, this too applies with the pay as you earn(PAYE) plan. The multiple angles and directions to view this plan lead to much conflict and controversy that keep this a trending topic, but even so, many people disagree on the degree of forgiveness this plan should permit.

In contrast to applied courses in ethics which attempt to clarify or solve substantive moral problems such as the aforementioned, other courses are taught in ethics curricula wherein primary focus is on such matters as exposition and analysis of normative theories, metaethical or linguistic analysis of ethical terms, or analysis of the logical structure of ethical reasoning. These courses are typically counted as among the (relatively) non-applied ethics courses. Here, the substantive ethical problems are played down and theory is emphasized. These courses set the stage for actual, life applications, but they do not themselves grapple with them in any systematic manner.

When an individual is proposed with a moral dilemma they will often seek the advice of others rather than acting solely upon their immediate cultural, familial, and cognitive predispositions; suggesting that judgments are also made about the moral judgments of others (Rest, Cooper, Coder, Masanz & Anderson, 1974).

Research proposes that education has a great potential to influence moral discourse and ethical dilemma resolution (Zrinyi & Balogh, 2004). Educators are in a key position to ensure that students are aware of specific strategies for dealing with moral distress through role-modeling and classroom studies (Zrinyi & Balogh). Moreover, being aware of one’s own values and biases can provide a basic point of

Moral Philosophy I will select two of these seven questions to be on the exam. To prepare for the exam, I would recommend writing a brief response (or a set of bullet points) to help you answer the questions on the exam. You will be allowed to bring these notes and your class notes on paper to use during the exam and the text: but no other materials or electronic devices. I will expect your answers to be brief but thorough on the exam (two to three paragraphs for each question). Exam 1 Review Questions 1.

In a world of diverse cultures and beliefs, it’s very problematic to distinguish weather something is morally right or wrong based on one’s specific teachings or beliefs. Furthermore, we were asked that before we began this course; what principles, factors, or beliefs have you relied on in deciding whether something is, morally right or, morally wrong or, neither right nor wrong in itself? Also we were also asked, what rules or procedures do you follow in applying these principles, factors, and/or beliefs? In this paper I will aim to relate my beliefs to how I made decisions.

For most of my life, I have been a strong believer in black- and- white. The very prominent line between right and wrong and if someone were to do something wrong, they should deal with the repercussions, no questions asked. But, as I have gotten older and continue to mature I’ve realized the gray area exists and is necessary. To any individual circumstance, empathy and reasoning are crucial. Over the past three years, I’ve begun in my personal life to consider people, their current circumstance, past trials and tribulations they have had to overcome that affect the way they make decisions and not always do decisions reflect one’s character.

I learned that a moral decision is a choice between right and wrong which has an effect on how we relate to others, ourselves, and with God. After doing some of the case studies, I began to get a better understanding of how to make a good moral decision. I can improve my moral decision making skills by looking at the four steps of making a right decision, which are seeing, judging, acting, and evaluating. Due to my understanding of the moral decision making process, I can now apply it to real-life situations in which a moral decision needs to be

Moral judgments do not stem from moral knowledge, for there are far too many discrepancies in what constitutes a moral act, quality, or behavior between cultures and individuals. These differences can be explained by viewing a moral claim not as an absolute truth, but as a reflection

When I first looked at the instructions for this assignment the ethical dilemma I wanted to talk about came immediately to mind. It was a decision I made more than fifteen years ago but I still remember it and had never thought of it in terms of ethics before. When I started this unit and began looking at situations from that perspective I became more intrigued and wondered if any of the readings could help me understand why I came to the decision I did . I once made the decision to engage in a behaviour deviant to the norm of my society, deciding that the “correct” action to take was to steal from one of my teachers. When I started reading about moral relativism and realised that this might be a way to explain how a “wrong” choice can sometimes be a “right” one, or at least to the person acting on it.

Moral dilemma’s and our decision are based upon to what we see as experience, interpreting and also studying or analyzing our decisions before we act. We may never know what could happen if we just stand by and let bad things happen. I went to a Cumberland Farms one night to get a coffee. When I walked inside to get a coffee I saw two kids and a father eating at the counter. After I had made the coffee, I went and paid then proceeded to leave. When I walked out I saw the father trying to figure out what was wrong with the car but I walked by.