More Secure Software

H.R. 1731, the National Cybersecurity Protection Advancement (NCPA) Act, is bipartisan bill passed unanimously by the Committee on Homeland Security. This pro-privacy, pro-security bill ensures the sharing of cyber threats is transparent and timely. It strengthens the NCCIC’s role as the lead civilian interface for cyber threat information sharing by: Providing liability protections for the voluntary sharing of cyber threat indicators and defensive measures with the NCCIC or private-to-private. Granting liability protections for private companies to conduct network awareness of their own information systems. Allowing companies to operate defensive measures and conduct network awareness on information systems they own or operate. The NCPA Act also ensures personal information

is a database of known software vulnerabilities and exposures and how to mitigate them with

9. Which domains need software vulnerability assessments to mitigate risk from software vulnerabilities? The end point or workstation.

Russon, M. (2014, June 10). Forget Software Vulnerabilities, Hardware Security Must Improve Before It's Too Late. International Business Times RSS. Retrieved July 12, 2014, from http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/forget-software-vulnerabilities-hardware-security-must-improve-before-its-too-late

In Herbert B. Dixon Jr.’s “Is Hacking the New Normal?”, the author is trying to convince the world to pay better attention to the technology in their lives. Dixon is addressing why he believes that the new “normal” is to live in a society where all technology is hacked and vulnerable all the time. Dixon creates the implied message that everything is a target, and should be handled as if it is a primary target of hacker’s attention and time, because it just might be. Dixon’s ideas are backed by statistics given by Peter Katel in his article “Identity Theft”, regarding the number of people that are attacked and how hard the economy is hit by the breach in security. Thus, showing just how many are attacked and giving validity to Dixon’s ideas about sources of information breaches. This source brings to light other sources of potential security breaches, and gives a new perspective regarding just “accepting” this new era. Dixon gives valid ideas on how to increase your safety but ultimately describes that nothing is completely safe.

Liginlal, D., Sim, I., & Khansa, L. (2009). How significant is human error as a cause of privacy breaches? An empirical study and a framework for error management. computers & security, 28(3), 215-228.

Whitman, M. E., & Mattord, H. J. (2010). Management of information security (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Course Technology.

Security flaws or vulnerabilities have increased and spread rapidly over the past several years. More and more vulnerabilities are being discovered by security experts worldwide. Some of these flaws have proved to be extremely dangerous and lethal as they have caused unmeasurable damages to industries and organizations as well as individual users. Security vulnerability can be identified as a fault or weakness in a product or system that allows an attacker to exploit and manipulate that particular vulnerability and compromise the confidentiality, integrity and availability of that product or system (Definition of a Security Vulnerability ).

Author Stephen T. Walker discussed the early development of the computer operating systems and efforts that have been made to protect the integrity of the information processed on the computers. Walker argues that attention to the protection of sensitive information was not in place until the late 1960s, when the study made by the Defense Science Board to determine potential flaws in the computer operating systems was conducted. He claims that by the early 1970s, compromising computer systems was so prevalent that further efforts to investigate and mitigate potential flaws in the operating system were initiated. Department of Defense (DoD), Air Force/Electronics Systems Division (ESD), Mitre Corporation, Honeywell, UCLA, SRI International,

The purpose of the report is to explore the current vulnerabilities in the information system network and outline potential

A simple name for peace of mind for what matters to you most. This is a service that promises fair prices, fast response, and total customer care. We provide world class security alarm monitoring for your home or business at a price that any budget can afford. Secure+ is a local company with a mind for the community, taking pride in knowing each and every one of our customers on a first name basis.

Zero Day Exploits where the assailant discovers a flaw ahead of the security community in raises the defense (Wadlow, 2009).

In the previous five years, cybersecurity has turned into the most looked for after calling around the world. More than 90 percent of respondents to an overview directed by the Ponemon Institute (2011) detailed being a casualty to cyberattacks amid the most recent year, costing all things considered more than $2 million for each association. This number keeps on ascending as the two programmers and security devices progress. As indicated by PwC, roughly 33% of all U.S. organizations are as of now utilizing digital protection (Lindros and Tittel, 2016).

In this article, the writer has talked about the new type of assessment called BYOD e-exam that is bring-your-own-device electronic examination that the educational institutes are using now a day. In this assessment instead of using exam papers students are allowed to bring their own laptops and sit an in-person exam but under the invigilated conditions. However special soft wares are used to restrict the access of the students to the prohibited files and functions of the computer and access is provided to the allowed resources only. This BYOD e-exam works on the decade-old security principle of the computer that is the security of the software depends upon the hardware security. Although the maximum level of security is ensured however the complete protection of integrity is not ensured yet.

Information security policy is challenging in non-industrialize nations because of mismatch between the current and the future system owing to the huge gap in physical, cultural, economic and different other contexts between the software designer and the place the system is being implemented. (Heeks,2002).