Morici's Argument Analysis

Not only do we get a lot out of getting a college degree in what we want to do, but so does our society. There are requirements for every job for a reason. Jobs need people that specialize in just that career field. They want us to be passionate about what we do and more importantly know exactly what we are doing. For example, hospitals have no room for mistakes because not only may it cost a life, it can also costs them money. We feel safer knowing people know how to do their jobs right. College education is necessary whenever there is a shortage in certain careers. It’s important to have higher education so there can be growth and competition in our society.

Have you ever just stopped to think about what it must be like to be “qualified” for a job yet be unemployed and homeless? Starving on the streets because you paid everything you had to an institution that was supposed to guarantee a better life, a more stable and successful career. Obviously this is an extreme case, not everyone who pays for college ends up living on the streets and broke, but almost every college graduate is in debt. For as long as college has been around it has always meant a better life, it’s always been that people who went to college were more successful, smarter, and would make way more money than someone who didn’t go to college ever would. Lately, however, college has become so expensive that going to college will more than likely leave you in debt working for years upon years just to pay back what you owe and then start making money for yourself.

The articles written that are completely devoted to either extreme of the issue are numerous. Pharinet says that college is not for everyone, supporting her position by saying that “approximately 50% of students who begin college never graduate” (635). Yet, Robert Perry aligns with the opposite side, saying that “we need more, not fewer university and community graduates” because his state is facing a shortage in workers who fulfil requirements for their positions (625). Humphrey agrees with Perry, proposing that “for any individual student, going to college is clearly better than not going” (she also cites economic reasons). Although these writers are very strong in their positions on one side or the other, they fail to acknowledge the fact that the decision to go to college depends on more than just the economy or the graduation rate. Although these two considerations are significant, the age of the graduate, prior commitments (such as a family business), and how much money and time is desired to be spent on the education as a whole. Thus it is reasonable to consider community college or vocational school depending on the specific situation of the graduating student.

When it comes to achieving success in the work force and finding a fulfilling and lucrative career there are few things more important that higher education. Going to college and getting a degree is essential in finding success in the work force. The problem is when the cost of gaining that degree outweighs the financial compensation the career that follows is able to supply. Very few people are able to pay for college out of pocket. The result of this is that students seeking higher education are forced to take out massive student loans. This means that they are entering the work force

What’s wrong with vocational school? Charles Murphy states, “vocational training is second class. “College is first class, college is only for those of higher intelligence” (para. 6). True enough everyone that attends college is not Albert Einstein, but that does not mean that they are not capable of going. Attending college is hard work you have to be motivated and focused. I know many people who have graduated with bachelor’s and master degrees and did not have an IQ of 100 or higher, this alone proves that college is for everyone and not just those with higher intelligence. I

There is a big difference between having a college degree and a high school diploma. To be exact, there is about a $400 per week difference in what is earned between those who only have a high school diploma and those who have bachelor’s degree. There also is a major substantial difference in unemployment. With a high school diploma, you are looking to earn $1.2 million, but those with a bachelor’s degree can look to see an increase which is $2.1 million. Also, people with a master’s degree look to get around $2.5 million over a lifetime. These are all reasons why college is important to intend. The only thing in the way costs of tuition for most people. If we helped lower the cost with some revenue from the NCAA and colleges that receive extra than it could help create more opportunities for people in

I am going to base my argument of whether college still matters in our community today on three American authors that is Andrew Delbanco, Alex Tobarrok, Michelle Singletary and Maria Dimera to come up with my view of whether I will agree to it or not. According to me, college is very important and everyone is supposed to have equal chances to join college and get a degree of his or her choice. I also advocate for all majors in the degree to have equal job opportunities as we all work hard id college to have a bright future and secure a good job in the job market. In addition to all these, I also recommend that the government should offer training to all high school leavers in order to train and advise them on how to choose college courses and what to major at to avoid people in the job market with degree courses that are not competitive at all. I also recommend that college offerdegrees in relation to what the market needs to avoid bringing a massive number of people to the job market more than the jobs available. The government should reduce this by availing courses that is competitive in the market at the needed time and I believe this will improve the economy greatly.

I’m pretty sure Craig Spencer felt the exact same way when he ate at a public restaurant, rode the subway, and went bowling in Brooklyn and look where that has gotten him. Troops who are returning from West Africa are being quarantined just like the astronauts of Apollo 11 were quarantined and no one thinks or thought any less of them for doing so. I believe that it is more heroic of them to have taken the necessary precautions to protect even more people than they already have rather than to just puff out their chests and say they’re invincible. In an article called “Ebola-Quarantine Objections are Frivolous,” Law Professor Eugene Kontorovich elaborated on the fact that courts have continuously advocated for quarantines for infectious diseases like tuberculosis and smallpox.

The argument Matt Taibbi is trying to make is that the cops have become more and more corrupt in recent years. Statistically the police have been more racially bias in the last 8 years since the early 80’s. His arguing points were the Garner case, which involved a man being targeted for being black and selling individual cigarettes outside a convenience store. Taibbi claims that the police in america today are racial profiling. Based on Taibbi’s statements, “The policy of constantly badgering people for trifles generates bloodcurdling anger in “hot spot” neighborhoods with industrial efficiency. And then something like the garner case happens and it all comes to relief”. Rooted in the article taibbi tells us that this is what is going to make

As the article goes on, Valenti enumerates and explains the recent violent attacks towards abortion clinics in the last few months, affirming that, in one of the attacks, “…the alleged perpetrator made a comment in its wake about ‘no more baby parts’.” The “baby parts” is the name often called by anti-choice supporters to fetal organs. This statement leaves an idea of what was the believe of the attacker towards the clinic. However, Valenti weakens her previous supporting details by claiming “The attack in Colorado, which left three people dead and nine wounded, was shocking, but it was also the predictable result of a culture that demonizes abortion…” In other words, the author is making a generalization by including a whole culture when proving

There is a large group of students who by high school know what career they want outside of high school. These students deserve to have the opportunity to start learning skills needed for that career by bringing more vocational schools to states like Nevada where the graduation rate is so low. “The latest figures from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) show that about 68% of high school students attend college. That means over 30% graduate with neither academic nor job skills” (Wyman, "Why We Desperately Need To Bring Back

Besides BonJour's argument of illustrative examples, moderate rationalism is defended by two intimately related dialectical arguments. The argument is that the denial of a priori justification will lead to a severe skepticism, in which only the most direct experience could be justified. Stemming from this severe skepticism, comes the stronger argument that argumentation itself becomes impossible. This essay will describe the distinct segments of the argument and will demonstrate the relationship between the two arguments.

Higher education should, without a doubt, be free and available for all. Imagine if you were a high school student with good grades and you weren’t able to go to college because of the high expenses; how would you feel? The costs have just gotten out of hand for students. Some kids have had no other choice but to enter the work field making little money. When this happens, people are unable to support themselves and are living paycheck-to-paycheck. To avoid situations like poverty,

Some people would say that the primary mission of colleges and universities should be in preparing students for the workforce. I would have to disagree. I believe the overall mission of colleges and universities should be academic knowledge. Although these institutions should help in preparing students for the workplace, students should have a well-rounded knowledge of the arts, humanities, ethics, as well as skill. I believe that if the primary mission were to prepare students for the workplace, such as a vocational school would do, some students might not seek the extra skills needed to succeed. They might learn how to do the job, but might still lack skills such as adaptation, persuasive verbal and written communication skills, critical

A four-year degree costs students “more than $19,000” (Stieger), and in this day and age it is nearly impossible to survive with only a high school education; being well qualified for a specific career position is very important to employers. George Leef, author of “Why on Earth Do We Have a ‘Student Loan Crisis’?,” says it best when he states that “college graduates are somewhat more reliable and easily trained than people with only high school diplomas … if there is a large enough number of [people] with college degrees, employers don’t have to bother with people who don’t have them” (Leef 29). That being said, I wonder how young people are expected to obtain some sort of degree, when higher education is nearly impossible for some families to afford. Although very significant changes have been made by our government offering improved financial aid to current and future students, more can still be done. Our politicians could increase the Pell Grant maximum to coincide with rising tuition costs, increase taxes on irrelevant goods and services to provide students with more direct funding, set up a “reward system” that would place more responsibility on the students (rather than themselves), and most importantly, our two main parties in office need to agree on specific changes.