Mortgage Loan Case Study

The Alva family enrolled their son, Sergio, at Paradise Cove, a behavioral modification program for troubled youth which was operated by the Defendants. The Alvas then initiated a suit against Teen Help Worldwide Association of Specialty Programs, R & B Billing, Dixie Contract Services, Robert Lichfield, Karr Fransworth, and Brent Facer, alleging a number of tort claims which arose from the enrollment of their child. This initial suit was made in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah on February 25, 2000. On August 5, 2003 the Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, which the court granted after hearing arguments regarding the motion on December 16, 2003. The motion for summary judgment was granted and filed on December 17, 2003. The Plaintiffs then did not file their notice of appeal until January 17, 2004, which was after the deadline to file such notice. The court then required the Plaintiffs to show reason as to why the appeal should be honored even though it was late.

The present case is a writ of error to that court, and it is now, in substance, averred that at the trial in the State court the defendant (now plaintiff in error) was denied rights to which he was entitled under the Constitution and laws of the United States.

Accordingly, no claim has been stated and this Court should dismiss the complaint or enter summary judgment in favor of the

Defendant’s arguments for dismissal, however, must fail even under the substantial compliance doctrine that he wishes the Court to apply. Here, unlike the prisoner in Mourey, it cannot in good conscience be said that Defendant

On January 20, 2006, Sucklal and Ella Louise Smith (“Smith”) purchased property located at 8511 Autumn Grain Gate, Laurel, Maryland 20723 (“the Property”). The deed was recorded on January 25, 2006. Sucklal and Smith held the property as tenants in common. Sucklal and Smith financed the purchase of the property, in part, with a loan in exchange for a note in the amount of $530,100.00, secured by a lien on the property. Freemont Investment & Loan was the originating lender for the mortgage. Through a series of conveyances, the note transferred through Avelo Mortgage and MTGLQ Investors, LP, and the note is currently held by Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company (“GSMC”). Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC (“Ocwen”) services the loan on behalf of GSMC.

In an attempt to justify impermissibly combining an anticipatory repudiation claim and a constructive eviction claim—two theories of relief that require different elements to be proved—into a single count, Plaintiffs rely on stale case law that is at least sixty five years old. Although they acknowledge that section 2-603(b) requires a separate cause of action to be alleged in a different count, they offer no justification for ignoring the provision’s unambiguous directive. As discussed above, proper pleadings are vital to the effective and efficient administration of justice. Neither this Court nor Defendants should be required to decipher a count that jumbles together two separate

FHA loan refinancing offers an excellent system for property owners to lower their monthly home loan repayments substantially. The information and guidelines mentioned previously can help anyone who wants to refinance a mortgage loan using the FHA refinancing options. That being said, it is appropriate to contact Texas FHA lenders to learn

Mortgage Connection is a mortgage brokerage firm that is located in San Francisco, California. This mortgage lending agency was established in 1998. Mortgage Connection is the connection to residential and commercial loans. They deliver various tools to assist their clients through the loan process. Through their website, clients can submit a complete secure loan application or pre-qualify for a home loan. Mortgage Connection is associated with Equal Housing Opportunity Agency. They have won the 2003 Bank of America Distinguished Broker

An appeal has to be filed within 30 days from the release of the decision by the judge. A copy of the appeal has to be served to the Secretary of Treasury and the non-appealing party. The opposing party has to respond to the appeal within 30 days of receiving the brief. After the appeal has been filed, no other motions or responses can be made. The only exception to this is when the Secretary of the Treasury says otherwise. The Secretary of the Treasury can also allow additional time to file any responses and

Affordable Home Loans, Inc. (AHLI) was founded in in the State of Montana on July 9, 2001, and started doing business as Division Mortgage Group, Inc. in December 2006 when moving locations to Division Street in Billings, MT. In November, 2010 the Licensee changed the corporate name to Division Mortgage Group, Inc. Division Mortgage Group, Inc. became licensed to do business in the State of North Dakota on May 16, 2012. The Licensee is wholly owned by the President of the company, Tevell Peete.

We reviewed the deficiency cited on the Maqque loan. While Brenda Maqque is the cosigner on the mortgage with her sister Sheryl, their mother, Juana M Tomaylla also lives in the property and is making payments on the mortgage. Please see the attached 12 month bank statements from Juana that support payments to The Federal Savings Bank in the amount of $2140.95/mo. I kindly ask that you reconsider this deficiency and accept the documents provided to mitigate this finding.

Facts: the case is related to transfer of some judges and non-confirmation of some others allegedly for political or other invalid reasons. The petitioners originally had only circumstantial evidence or surmises to go by. So they ask the court to direct the government to produce the correspondence exchange

At the hearing, the Plaintiff articulated that his dismissal was rejected by the clerk’s office for failing to affix an appropriate fee or fee waiver to the filing. In any event, the plaintiff articulated that he had previously dismissed the action because he thought that it was necessary to do so in order to add additional defendants. The plaintiff then advised that he has since learned that he can move to amend his pleading, and as such, he expressed a desire

To the extent the Subservicer is contacted by a state Attorney General, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or any other state or federal regulator to discuss any Mortgage Loan subserviced hereunder or the subservicing procedures to be implemented under this Agreement, except as otherwise prohibited by law or regulation, Subservicer shall provide Servicer prompt notice thereof. Subservicer also covenants to promptly forward to Servicer any and all

The reason the company bought these risky loans was because they have a much higher interest rate. Rather than paying 3.53 or 4% interest on a home loan these people were forced to pay almost double that, between 6 and 7%. The conflict of interest arose from the fact that Freddie Mac was the one whom the recipients of these loans had to try to get refinancing from. They did not want to refinance the high interest mortgages into lower interest ones. This caused them to have a conflict of interest. They were not interested in helping people to save their homes because they were making money off the interest. Many people were in need of refinancing, which would effectively pay off the higher interest rate loan and create a new loan with more affordable prices. Freddie Mac refused to help these people out of their mortgages, effectively because they