preview

Most Dangerous Game And High Noon Literary Analysis

Decent Essays
Open Document

In the story, The Most Dangerous Game, written by Richard Connell, a world-known hunter falls off a yacht and stumbles upon an island inhabited by a fierce competitor thirsty for men to hunt. In the film, High Noon, written by Carl Foreman, a murderer is returning to his hometown, seeking sweet revenge for being sent to jail. The town marshal struggles between leaving town with his Quaker wife or staying behind to defend his town. In both the story and the film, there are similar conflicts while the characters and settings are different, which affects the plot of both stories. The conflicts in both stories are relatively similar. Overall, they both include death and antagonists with unfair advantages. "One almost did win, I eventually had to use the dogs" (Connell 14). This citation from The Most Dangerous Game refers to General Zaroff's hunting game. It means that whenever someone is winning his game, Zaroff cheats and uses his dogs to kill them. This is an unfair advantage because Rainsford is all on his own while Zaroff has help from both his …show more content…

"Amy Kane is, without knowing it, one of the new women of the period..." (Foreman). As noted in the quote from High Noon, there are women in the story that play a very role in the outcome of the film. This makes it not dependent on only the men. On the contrary, all of the characters in The Most Dangerous Game are men. There aren't any women at all and the entire story relies on only men. In addition, the characters in both works are different because of the way the protagonists behave. For example, Will Kane believed that he has a responsibility to his town and must stay behind and kill to protect its people. However, Rainsford isn't able to leave the island and kills to protect only himself. This might be foul play, but if the characters didn't function this way, the conflicts in the stories wouldn't be the

Get Access