Motivational Interviewing Model As Intervention Method For Eating Disorders Essay

Introduction: Hello my name is xxxxxxx xxxxxx and I am an Eating Disorder Counselor. Today I will be discussing the physiological reasons for eating or not eating and then I will open the floor for discussion.

Zabinski, F. M., Wilfley, E. D., Calfas, J. K., Winzelberg, A. J., & Taylor, B. C. (2004). An interactive psychoeducational intervention for women at risk of developing an eating disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, (5), 914-919. Retrieved February 4, 2005, from PsycINFO database.

"Motivational interviewing is an evidenced-based counseling approach that health care providers can use to help patients adhere to treatment recommendations. It emphasizes using a directive, patient-centered style of interaction to promote behavioral change by helping patients explore and resolve ambivalence" (Levensky et al., 2007). Motivational interviewing is a highly individualized therapeutic approach that is client centered and encourages clients to explore the reasons for any maladaptive behavior and then make changes. However, it is also a directed form of therapy, so that the counselor takes a more active role than in some forms of client-centered therapy. However, it is not a confrontational form of therapy; rather than engaging in hostile interactions with clients, the counselor takes an empathic approach and helps the client identify areas of ambivalence and make plans to change those areas. In this way, motivational interviewing can be considered a goal-directed therapy because it is not sufficient for the clients to gain understanding; they are also meant to make changes based on what they find. Furthermore, while the counselor may take a passive role in some therapeutic approaches, the counselor is more active in motivational interviewing. The counselor's job is to encourage the client to make changes.

Eating disorders can be defined as someone who eats, or refrains from eating, in order to satisfy

There are 4 aspects of motivational interviewing (MI) spirts that practitioners need to consider when working with clients, these aspects include partnership, acceptance, compassion, and evocation. Partnership has to do with the practitioner functioning as the partner for the client and working with the client’s own knowledge to help them. Acceptance has to do with communicating absolute worth, accurate empathy, affirmation, and autonomy support. Compassion is the aspect of sincerely caring about the suffering of your clients and promoting the welfare of clients, giving priority to their needs. Lastly, evocation involves drawing out the client’s personal motivation for changing (Clifford, Curtis, 2015) Out of all 4 aspects of MI spirts, the

As I mention above, motivational interviewing is not a theory, but this approach to counseling was develop in 1980, when Miller taught young counselors to use techniques such as accurate empathy and behavioural self-control training (Miller, Taylor, & West, 1980). According to Miller et al. (1980), counselors who exhibit empathy during behavioural therapy were more successful with clients with addiction than treatment without

. Motivational enhancement therapy (MET): is a method of counseling that assists clients to help resolve their doubt (hesitation) about engaging in treatment. The clinician can counter this initial resistance to change, by reflecting back on the clients own statements on desiring to become better. This is accomplished by building a plan of change with the client, which is based on person centered motivations. The treatment is designed to support clients in recognizing and building on personal strengths to help change their addiction behaviors. Through the use of self-motivational statements during motivational interviewing a plan can be established between the clinician and client. There are key components to the principles of motivational

Motivational interviewing is a techniques in which the clinician assist in the change process and express acceptance of the client. It is a collaborative approach with substance-using clients in which the style of counseling can help resolve ambivalence that prevent clients from attaining their personal goals. Motivational interviewing builds on Carl Roger's optimistic and humanistic theories about people's capabilities for exercising free choice and changing through a process of self-actualization. The clinician role in motivation interviewing is directive, with a goal of eliciting self - motivational statements and behavioral change. Essentially, motivational interviewing actives the capability for beneficial change that everyone possess.

Purpose The purpose of this speech is to inform the audience of the different types of eating disorders and how they can be

Through learning from my first experience following motivational interview number one, I was able to gain experience and knowledge on how to increase my interaction with my patient. Throughout my last interview, I felt as if I was being too abrupt in wanting the patient to change but this time I felt I let him tell me the reasons why it was important for him to change, and I also was able to understand more about his past experiences with the

Eating Disorders are conditions in which involves irregular eating habits, either insufficient or excessive food, that affects inimical the body’s image and mental health (Wikipedia). It affects men and women of all ages, but it has a greater impact among adolescences and young adults. In the United States, 24 million Americans are battling eating disorders, in which 1 million are males and 23 million are females. An individual who portraits this condition may have an irrational self-image thought that impinged on an individual’s life and affects their health by disrupting body functions and daily activities (National Eating Disorders Association).

Miller and Rollnick say that motivational interviewing is a way of being with a client, not just a set of techniques for doing counseling. ( as cited in

Mclorg and Taub (1987) noted that this form of treatment allowed many of the respondents sought out for psychiatric treatments to diminish the illness. They did not follow up to see the rate of relapse or question the participants about their feelings toward the group therapy and if the presence of therapy truly helped diminish their eating disorder. A factor aside from background that was significant in this case study was the use of advertisement. All participants openly chose to attend the group in search of treatment.

Within Study 1 were two different groups of participants. The first group of participants were experts in the field of eating and weight disorders. The second group of participants were females with diagnosed eating disorders. The investigators initially developed a survey of 56 items covering 13 facets of loss of control eating. Investigators developed the initial items and facets by reviewing qualitative literature, and the test that were currently being used to measure binge eating and bulimia. The investigators sent the survey through email to 60 experts in the field of eating disorders and 34 experts responded. The experts were asked to examine the 56 items on relevance and clarity and to suggest additional items and ideas reflecting LOC-eating. The experts were asked for feedback on the working definition of the construct of LOC-eating. Expert feedback resulted in 18 items being added, 10 items being deleted, and 12 facets being retained within the LOCES questionnaire. Based on the feedback from the experts the following working definition for the study was

In addition, patients with eating disorders also exhibit other traits associated with low self-esteem, such as problems with their overall self-image, excessive concern over weight and shape, and globally negative attitudes about their self-control and discipline (Button 1997). The methodology for the research leading to these conclusions about low self-esteem and eating disorders typically involves elements such as questionnaires examining eating behavior, self-esteem and general psychological well-being (such as the Offer self-image questionnaire), depression and self-esteem scales (such as the Rosenberg self-esteem scale and the Hospital anxiety and depression scale), personal interviews with doctors, psychologists and researchers, and finally tests designed specifically for eating disorders (such as the Bulimia test and the EAT-40).