preview

Mount Everest: Outweigh The Perils Of Mountaineering Or Transcending?

Decent Essays

Many people question whether or not the perils of mountaineering or extreme mountain climbing, such as climbing Mount Everest, outweigh the benefits. Mount Everest enthusiast have recently been debating whether or not the negatives of mountaineering outweigh the positives. If they decide the negatives are greater than the benefits, they may close Mount Everest from the public to be able to make a more informed decision, and if they decide the negatives aren’t greater than the positives, then they will keep Mount Everest open. In my point of view, the negatives of mountaineering outweigh the positives or negatives for reasons that include, cost, death, and religious importance. The first reason the negatives of mountaineering Mount Everest outweigh the positives is that the cost of climbing Mount Everest is stated in source #2 when it states,”...when 234 climbers reached the summit… Each and every one of them had paid $10,000 for a climbing permit.” This displays how in total, they made 2,340,000, in just climbing permits alone not including climbing gear! Consequently, It also shows that Mount Everest can be closed for a short period of time and …show more content…

In source #1, it explains,”Since 1922, more than 250 people have died trying to climb the mountain.” This displays how lots of people can die even with the limited number of people willing to do so, because of the cost or danger involved. Another example of the death is stated in source #2,”...an overhanging wedge of ice that swept down to a slope below in chunks the size of trucks. The falling ice hit twenty-five men, killing sixteen of them, all Nepalis.” This shows that in one case, 16 out of 25 men died because of the perils of Mount Everest. While pure physical death toles may explain the perils of Mount Everest, nevertheless, a not so obvious example of the negatives is the religious importance of places like Mount

Get Access