Mq-1c Eagle Research Papers

The previous years of the beginning World War I, the military technology produced an enormous firepower that made the 20th century’s western armies capable to set up advantageous positions, and during the course of the war, tanks, artillery and infantry weapons, aircraft, battleship, and gas were decisive solutions. For example, Knox and Murray state that in 1917 air force was a very important power in both Britain and Germany, which provided them not only the reconnaissance to reconnoiter enemy positions but also artillery observation to support the bombing missions by enhancing its attack and coordinating ground-air operations. Due to today’s progress in technologies since World War I has acquainted with, military is able to conduct fight by using advanced technologies in the uncertain and complex environment whether in defensive or offensive positions that enhance the speed and quality of combat, as well as the basic combat value of an individual warrior. In today’s warfare, similarly World War I, military forces use last advanced weaponries and unmanned aircrafts to provide air operations in terms of intelligence and reconnaissance and to continue their combat role by attacking high-value targets. For instance, in today’s conflicts such as Afghanistan and Iraq the unmanned aerial vehicles play the same

It influenced future generations of soldiers and equipment to advance both tactically and technically, greatly increasing the multi-role diversity and capabilities of the Air Defense Artillery systems of today’s United States Army. Compared to the Patriot Launcher Missile system, it showed that Air Defense units could be multifaceted. Like the M42 Duster (SPAAG), the Patriot system demonstrated excellent destruction ratio for aircraft but the system also worked well in defense of TBM’s (Tactical Ballistic

Military forces deploy to vastly different environments across the globe. However, two of the most important discriminating factors which shape how operations are conducted are acceptance and protection of US forces by the local population. Operational environments are roughly sorted into two major categories. Permissive environments are locations where the host nation has control of its territory and supports US operations. Non-permissive environments refer to locations with hostile or uncertain local response. Although the weapon’s systems and sensors do not change from one location to the next, the environment surrounding a deployed Air Defense unit has a significant impact on how it is best operated. The Patriot and Avenger weapons systems clearly demonstrate the disparate considerations that must be taken for implementation of each asset when employed in a permissive and non-permissive environment respectively.

To fully identify how counterintelligence supports the maneuver commander an understanding of the operational framework that the maneuver units operate in must be understood. The Army’s overall conceptual framework has changed over time due to the Army’s participation in conflicts. To appreciate the current mission of maneuver forces a quick glance of recent history must be accomplished. In 1982 the Army’s capstone doctrine focus was AirLand Battle. This primarily

Mission focus creates excellent training opportunities and allows the Soldiers to perform their duties much like they did while deployed. For example, the Geospatial Imagery analysts 35G conduct Live Environment Training (LET) at their home station where they process targets allocated off the ASCC target deck. Daily the Soldiers work their targets and pass the information back to the Theater Intelligence Brigade (TIB). The theater Geospatial Planning Cell (GPC) do much of the same, now utilize the division and brigade Geospatial Analysts 12Y to update the theater geospatial database. The LET relationship provides the ASCC additional manpower to work lower priority requirements while providing training opportunities to the units. Soldiers spend more time doing their job and less time “cutting

In the present day, many companies have developed tons of drone models ranging in different sizes, lengths, and power usage. The two most used drones for attack are the MQ-1 Predator and the MQ-9 Reaper, and are looked up to for their ability to hover thousands of feet off the ground and above their target for hours with high-resolution surveillance. The

All these systems change as new technology advances into the way we do business. Every year, increasingly, military occupational specialties will encompass information technology to enhance performance, speed, and reliability for real-time situational awareness. The military is on the cutting edge in conceiving, testing, and adapting information

This, in fact, could prove to be very limiting for its use in military operations outside of the U.S. Navy. At one point during the development of the MQ-8 series, the U.S. Army briefly tested a four bladed version of the MQ-8A, but quickly halted testing concluding that the smaller and cheaper Raven could provide the same capabilities (CITE). Although the MQ-8C has improved lifting capacity, the Army has not shown renewed interest in the new platform. The Avenger on the other hand has a massively configurable weapons delivery system. Capable of carrying weapons as large as 2,000 pounds, such as hellfire missiles, and a variety of smaller weapons, the Avenger stores its weapons payload inside a bay in its fuselage. This highly configurable bay allows up to seven different kinds of weapons to be easily reconfigured in order to support a wide variety of hunter-killer type missions (CITE). In addition, the weapons package can be completely swapped out for a sensors package, furthering its already superior ISR

As a CBRN Concepts Officer assigned to MSCoE, CPT Nobles fully integrated himself in the efforts of the entire team. He was an integral member in the development of the maneuver support functional operating concept document. Additionally, his contributions enhanced the contents of the ATP 3-90.40 (Combined Arms Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction) manual and the maneuver support operational & organizational document. He also provided a thorough review of 12 documents for other organizations.

For over forty years, the Aegis weapon system has been the main form of defense for the U.S. Navy’s surface ship fleet. Created by Lockheed Martin, this defense system has separated itself from any other since being created in 1983. In a world where defensive threats can come in many forms the Aegis system has adjusted and overcome all possible threats truly making it the most elite and necessary onboard ship system to have. With the use of SPY-1 radar, the Aegis display system, the weapons control system, and the command and decision system, Aegis is able to attack land targets, submarines, and surface ships simultaneously making it the most dominant system for the US Navy to use today. Along with surface and subsurface combatants, Aegis can defend against aircraft and their

Since the war on terror, technological developments in the signal realm have been numerous and far reaching. The Army network and supported information technology (both hardware and software) provided by the Corps are an integral part of warfighting capabilities and combat multipliers. Commanders and warfighters rely on the knowledge and skills of the signal Soldiers to provide and implement these technologies to meet their operational needs.

As today’s battlespace is awash with information, there is a growing need for patrol bases to have access to the FMV imagery, threat warnings from Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) platforms and target packs. Failure to make this information available will inevitably limit the success of the patrol bases force protection. With the information at the commander disposal, this will allow them to maximise the intelligence available to evaluate options and potential strategies before making critical decisions.

The Gray Eagle offers a reliable, low-risk next generation UAS solution to meet challenging requirements for reconnaissance, surveillance, and target acquisition (RTSA) and attack operations. The Gray Eagle has an endurance of 25 hours. It has speeds which can reach up to 167 KTAS. It can operate up to 29,000 feet while carrying 1,075 lb (488 kg) of internal and external payload. The Gray Eagle can carry multiple payloads, including the Electro-Optical/Infrared (EO/IR) with laser designation, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) communications relay, and four Hellfire missiles. The Gray Eagle can stay in a combat zone longer than the previous predator drones which supports the Army’s “single fuel in the battlefield” concept. It provides increased horsepower and significantly improved fuel efficiency, utilizing either jet or diesel fuel. The Gray Eagle features a fault-tolerant control system and a triple-redundant avionics system, similar to the systems integrated in the battle-proven Predator-B. Designed with airworthiness as a primary consideration, the Gray Eagle, is engineered to meet and exceed manned aircraft reliability standards. The Gray Eagle is dedicated to direct operational control by Army field commanders. Its expansive mission set includes wide-area intelligence surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR), convoy protection, improvised explosive device (IED) detection and defeat, close air support, communications relay, and weapons delivery missions. The Gray Eagle features an automatic takeoff and landing system (ATLS) that allows the aircraft to be launched and recovered without any operator interaction. The aircraft has successfully conducted tens of thousands of takeoffs and landings. They are attached to the combat aviation brigade in multiple divisions throughout the Army. In each division, the Gray Eagle UAVs support the

Project Abstract: The following is a discussion of the application of Army Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) capabilities which are employed in order to enhance the targeting and effects of the Ar-my’s Cyber Electromagnetic Activities (CEMA) Sections. The aim is to address how the assimila-tion of assets, programs, and capabilities currently available to the Army SIGINT Community by the Army CEMA Sections could significantly enhance their ability to conduct and execute the war-time mission, thereby enhancing the commanders’ understanding of the enemy’s tactical use of the electromagnetic spectrum (EMS). This, in effect, would also reduce the time invested in acquiring EMS specific information and increase the precision and execution of Electronic Attack (EA), Elec-tronic Protect (EP), and Electronic Warfare Support (ES) by strengthening and

Drones, the US choice of weapon to combat ISIS. It is automated, unpiloted, and work on their own. They do surveillance, hunt, identify and kill enemies based on calculations made by the software, not decisions made by humans. They kill from a distance through technological mediation, without the shock of direct confrontation.