Mr Haubrick Case Study

There is indeed a crisis to a certain extent in the use of forensic science in the prosecution of individuals in criminal cases; this is because some judges and juries over value the objectivity of forensics, without evaluating the timeline and crime scene as a whole. This was particularly evident in the 1995 case of Mallard. In this case Andrew Mallard was convicted for the 1994 murder of Mrs Laurence, a jewellery shop owner in Perth. Mallard is now considered innocent of the murder; however this innocence was only obtained through two appeals. In the second appeal of Mallards, forensic evidence was put forward, but it is alleged that it had not been properly disclosed to the legal team of Mr Mallard when the trial commenced. Thus one of the

On December 22, 2015, at about 6:20 pm amazon associate Girard Pedley notified James Weisgable that his car was damaged by another car. The case was then passed down to security officer Tatiana Kania to review some footage. At end of shift Girard Pedley approached his car and had noticed that a blue pickup truck’s bed was parked on top of his car. He noticed it and backed his car up to check if it was damaged. He saw that the tow hitch of the truck had made a small scratch and peeled off some paint. After reviewing camera footage; using camera C244 port 1 and camera C074, Tatiana was able to see that the blue pickup truck had parked at 4:03 pm. The owner of the blue truck had come in to the building at 4:05 pm. At 4:05:06 the truck had rolled

I spoke with Marlon about additional items in the vehicle the victims said should be in there. I asked if the items would still be in the vehicle. Marlon said “Probably not, but I didn’t take them” he said there was seven other persons in the vehicle at some point. Marlon was asked what time “he” parked the car on Copperstone Circle. He said between 10pm and midnight.

This officer responded to Priced Rite Tree Service in reference to a stolen vehicle. Upon arrival, this officer contacted Middleborn, who advised they just noticed their 1988 Chevrolet black pickup was missing. Middleborm advised the vehicle was stolen sometime within the last 3-4 days. Middleborn stated an employee was supposed to take the vehicle in for repairs. Middleborn stated he called the company and learned the vehicle was never dropped off. Middleborn stated he spoke with his employee and learned the employee thought the vehicle was already in for repairs and did not check with anyone.

Upon receipt of the vehicle, Mr. Meyer found the vehicle to have paint damages in several areas of the car, along with the hood being misaligned, the trunk unable to open, and the vehicle unable to crank. Mr. Meyer requested a full refund of the purchase price and when Mr. Alphin refused, he filed a claim in district court in Nebraska. Mr. Alphin was served notice to appear in court and he refused; therefore, the Nebraska court entered a default judgment for the amount of $8.942.30 against Mr. Alphin, defendant for Race City Classics, LLC. The amount awarded was for the necessary cost of repair alleged by Mr. Meyer, plaintiff. Mr. Meyer then filed a “Docketing of Foreign Judgment” and a “Notice of Filing for Judgment” in Iredell County Superior Court. This is the county and court in North Carolina where Race City Classics, LLC resides. Upon notification of the filings,

I made contact with the passenger of the vehicle black female who identified herself as Ms. Emily Johnson who advised me Mr. Dale Roberson was the operator of the vehicle at the time this incident occurred.

On Friday, 1-22-2016, I, Investigator Torres, met with the claimant Ms. Sharon Lie at Yamaha Motors Corporation at 6555 Katella Ave., Cypress, CA 90630. After a brief discussion, she did not agree to have her statement recorded. The detail is a summary of her statement:

for the dismissal of a nonmanufacturer defendant from a strict liability product claim upon certifying the correct identity of the manufacturer of the allegedly defective product.” Murphy v. Mancari’s Chrysler Plymouth, Inc., 381 Ill App. 3d 786, 770, 887 N.E.2d 569 (2008); 735 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/2-621(b). Roy’s “file[s] an affidavit certifying the correct identity of the manufacturer of the product allegedly causing injury, death, or damage,” and “the plaintiff has filed a complaint against the manufacturer ..., and the manufacturer ... ha[s] or [is] required to have answered or otherwise pleaded.” 735 ILCS 5/2–621(a)–(b). In support of its motion to dismiss, Roy’s has submitted the required seller's exception affidavit as an attachment to its motion. The affidavit is from Charles Harkin, Senior Vice-President of Acquisitions for Roy’s, who oversaw the purchase and distribution of all paint and paint supplies sold in Roy’s stores through the United States, including the stores in the Chicago area. Harkin states that, Arcadia is the sole manufacturer of the paints and stains sold under its brand name, the paints arrive at Roy’s without any change to the product and labelling, and identifies Acadia as the manufacturer. Roy’s has meet the requirements specified in the “seller’s exception” allowing it to be dismissed as a matter of

Michael remained where he was residing and the case has been transferred for monitoring, servicing and future court involvement.

On 07/19/16, Investigator Kirkwood and I responded to 3300 Bankhead in reference to Valero service station being broken into. Upon arrival contact was made with on scene deputies and information was retrieved. I then made contact with the Valero owner, Paul Davis, and a consent to search form was completed. Inv. Kirkwood then took photos of the building to include the damage to the outside of the front door. Inv. Kirkwood and I entered the front door, where several more pictures were taken. I then brought Davis to the back where his camera system is to try and retrieve the video. Inv. Kirkwood continued taking pictures of the store and damage. The video was retrieved from the security system. In the video it shows that on 07/19/16 at 3:01am

Upon my arrival I met with Henry Crumbly in reference to items missing out of his residence. Crumbly stated that upon arrival this morning he noticed that the kitchen window behind his residence appeared to have been damaged. Crumbly advised me the window was lying on the ground outside of the residence. Crumbly stated that he entered the residence to investigate Crumbly advised me during his investigation he discovered his Whirlpool washer valued at $500 appeared to have been removed by unknown person(s). Crumbly stated he no longer lives at the residence but he checks the residence periodically for missing property or damages. Crumbly advised me he is unaware of who may be responsible. Mr. Crumbly advised me he does not remember the serial

January 2008: This brochure of Texas Republican Congressional candidate Dean Hrbacek was mailed to voters. The photograph is a composite of Hrbacek's head and another person's (slimmer) body. Campaign manager Scott Broschart acknowledged that the image is a composite. Hrbacek has been so busy that he had no time to pose for a full-length photo for the mailing, Broschart said. "He may appreciate that we took a few pounds off him," Broschart said. "I think the voters ... are more concerned with the issues as opposed to pretty photo

On 09/26/16, Mr. Trotter began attending the TEECH Foundation, 1750 W. 103rd St. and has attended daily as verified by the executive director at the TEECH Foundation. On 10/13/16, Mr. Trotter met with the executive director at the TEECH Foundation who suggested that he begin one-on-one counseling sessions on-site. On 10/14/16, he began counseling sessions. The executive director at the TEECH Foundation informed Mr. Trotter’s DOC case manager that if deemed necessary, Mr. Trotter will be referred for extensive counseling after his one-on-one sessions conclude on 11/25/16.

Mr Fallas, the defendant, accidentally shot his friend, Mr Mourlas, the plaintiff below, in the leg while hunting kangaroos. At the time of the accident, the four men were participating in an activity referred to as “spotlighting” or shooting kangaroos at night with the aid of a spotlight.

Angie M sought relief after her trial court committed erred in her case against physician Robert Hiemstra by sustaining a demurrer for two causes of action without leave to amend and granted a motion to strike her claim for punitive damages. Hiemstra was charged with unlawful seduction of, and relations with, a minor, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligent infliction of emotional distress, and battery. Hiemstra employed Angie and learned of her dysfunctional family background and her other particular vulnerabilities, which he used to create a dependent relationship between the two asserted enough evidence to fulfill the "outrageous" conduct requirement for intentional infliction of emotional distress cause of action Also,