Mr. Rouse's Case Study

This report reviews the case R v Dean and discusses some key elements. The offender, a Mr Roger Dean, a registered nurse working in Quakers Hill Nursing Home was charged and convicted of a crime with three charges; larceny, murder and grievous bodily harm. The offender admits to primarily stealing painkillers at the nursing home and in order to distract management of the ongoing investigation, he lit fire in the nursing home on the 18/11/2011 causing eleven counted deaths and eight people injured due to burns or smoke inhalation.

Canada has become a country where laws such as: assisted suicide, prostitution, and abortion are becoming easily altered by higher powers; the power of the judges. Canadian judges are changing certain laws that affect the quality of living. The question comes down to who is truly in charge of law making in Canada? The government may make the laws, but judges may reject and change the entirety laws through the use of the entrenchment of the Charter. Additionally, judicial supremacy retains their power through a paradoxical parliamentary supremacy. Furthermore appointing government officials and electing government officials plays a tremendous part in correlations to Canadian democracy. To summarize, judiciary are too powerful through the entrenchment

I hope all of you are doing wonderful. The reason of this letter is because of my concern about the new federal discriminatory redlining policies affecting minorities. The Return Preparer Office has been intentionally discriminating against people without Social Security numbers unlawfully. Since there is no law against providing a ptin number to people without a SSN, and The Internal revenue service/Return Preparer Office position is unlawful. Therefore, I am appealing the IRS denial letter 4739 dated 3/24/2016.

(Exhibit 3). Having received no response since March 8, 2017, on March 20, 2017, Counsel for State Farm sent Arnold a letter: 1) reminding her of her outstanding discovery requests; 2) indicating that we had not yet received her outstanding discovery requests; and 3) requesting that Arnold provide her discovery responses within five days of the date of the letter. (Exhibit 4, March 20, 2017, letter from Green). To date, despite repeated requests, State Farm has not received Arnold’s Answers to Interrogatories, and the docket entries for this matter do not show that the same have been served. (Exhibit 2).

In this case, the Department’s Representative testified to mailing the Appellant a manual notice on June 3, 2016 advising that the household’s application for cash assistance was being denied due to failure to meet residency requirements. On August 9, 2016, The Appellant called the Department to make an oral appeal. The Appellant’s appeal was filed August 10, 2016, sixty-eight (68) days after the denial. Since the appeal was

Could you please assist me? My associate was reviewing appeal # APP-2018599 that was completed by Priscilla Wilkerson. She notice that all the claims checks were suppressed when they were not advised in the SOW to processed this way. In order for all 18 claims to be reprocessed, Danielle has been advised to redo the SOW. Since, this was not her error, I think that these claims need to be reprocessed again correctly by Priscilla or another claim analyst. Could you please review and advise? Attached is communication from Danielle trying to get assistance from Priscilla regarding the mistake that was made and Kishma advising of next steps.

The Department’s Representative contends that the household was receiving benefits and was due for renewal. The household consisted of the Appellant’s husband who is receiving Home and Community Based Service benefits under the MA program and the Appellant was receiving State payment of her Medicare Part B Premium. The Appellant’s total monthly income was Social Security benefits in the amount of $855.00 and a monthly annuity in the amount of $66.00, totaling $921.00. The Appellant’s spouse received income of $767.00 from Social Security benefits. The total household income was combined

Because I was cognizant of The Department of Social Services 30 day application policy that indicates a representative has a minimum of 30 days to process an application to determine a recipient’s eligibility. The information provided pertinent data that help me assist and advocate for my client’s needs.

On 7/15/2015, CM conducted a search via Security to locate client. Client was found sitting in the patio. Security asked the client to go upstairs to the 3rd floor to see social services. CM met with the client and completed Bi-Weekly ILP Review. In the meeting the client was well groomed and dressed appropriately for the weather. She appears to be calm, cooperative and friendly. CM inquires how client is doing since the last Bi-Weekly IlP. Client replies she is doing well and she is still waiting for DHS Manifest if she was approved or disapproved for the apartment” CM reiterates to the client as per P4P meeting on 7/9/2015, client was informed to be “open minded” and also there is a possibility she may not be accepted for the housing.

You assert discrimination based on disability as you report having Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and were not granted a reasonable accommodation to be interviewed at the DHS office when requested on October 8, 2015 in an alleged phone call with (SU) around noon. You assert that LEA presence at your home caused increased anxiety when they arrived with DHS to conduct an interview with you.

Client came into social service after receiving a SUS appointment slip left at the front desk by CM 10/3/17 to meet on 10/5/17 at 4pm. Client stated she only had a few minutes to talk because she had to cook dinner. Client informed CM her PA account was closed and she replied once again. Client also reports she has to visit Connecticut, PA office for a letter stating her PA case is closed in that state. Client informed her CM all documents requested will be submitted within a weeks’ time. Client reports two of her four daughters Selah McKenzie and Olivia Lue have a doctor appointment tomorrow October, 5, 2017. The other two daughters, Trinity and Nyan McKenzie have appointments next week Tuesday on October 10,

Carla you did not meet expectations regarding documentation from Sept. thru Dec. 2016 and you had a total of 29 overdue cases during this time period. Carla when you do enter your case notes your documentation is organized and understandable in Case Compass. Carla, you have shown the ability to independently connect with collateral contacts and/or external stakeholders during an investigations and maintain working relationship with these contacts; however, your customer service skills could show some improvement as complaints have been received from families, community partners and other outside entities. You have an understanding of when it is appropriate to open a Protective Services case; you consult with your supervisor on a minimum of a monthly basis to address concerns or questions, review your caseload and to discuss significant issues. Carla I would like to see you show improvement in meeting the time frames for face to face and requesting postponements, delays and waiver of face to face visits

Client and this CM was able to complete all three forms. Client stated to this CM working on Friday at 12PM to Monday at 12PM each week as home health aide in New Canaan for an 89-year-old women. Client expressed happiness to be employed. Client stated being homeless since June of 2016 when due to getting kicked out of father's household. Client stated needing help to get housed is the reason for requesting case management services. Client stated to this CM being kicked out of father's house was due to drug usages. Client is currently receiving $383 monthly from SNAP and make roughly $1890 monthly from job. Client stated to this CM utilizing the Day Street Clinic in Norwalk CT as a primary care provider. Client also stated to this CM receiving therapy from Rebecca at Day Street Clinic for pass history of trauma. Client stated to this CM being raped three years ago and have a history of sexual abuse. Client stated to this CM medical history contains heart murmur. Client currently is taking 500mg of trazadone nightly. Client is diagnosed with depression and bipolar disorder. Client stated to this CM having 8 children, 6 biological and 2 adopted. Client family history contains depression and high blood pressure. Client scored 8 on the CAGE Assessment and scored 15 on the Modified

Sent an IM to Santiam SSP, Supervisor requesting to have a phone conversation regarding Ms Garner's case worker Seven Serratos interaction with Ms Garner and also to talk about the pending decision for a physical address, as stated on TRACS # 229 "TANF will still be PENDING for a physical address here in the area where she is staying".

She did not indicate the Appellant’s financial responsibility for the months of need requested. At the administrative hearing she indicated that she was not sure of the amount of the Appellant’s financial responsibility. Regulations found at 55 Pa Code 275.4, state that the Department’s Representative should be able to provide “evidence to support the decision or action, including identification of the pertinent regulations applied in making the decision” as well as a “ detailed computation of the grant”. The ALJ finds that the Department’s Representative failed to explain in detail how she determined the amount of the TANF Diversion payment based on the amount of the Appellant’s financial need. The Department’s Representative agreed that the household expenses had been received but testified that she did not know the amount of the Appellant’s financial obligations because the amount of TANF Diversion issued was based on the fact that the Appellant received zero income in the month of May 2016. The Department’s Representative testified that since May was the only month in the three (3)-month period that Appellant had no income, she was only authorized for one