Mr. Walker 's Legal Representative

Mr. Simpson, a minor resident of California, is seeking to inherit from the estate of Mrs. Sweeney, decedent and resident of California at time of death, under the doctrine of equitable adoption. Mrs. Sweeney is the widow of Sam Sweeney (hereinafter called “Mr. Sweeney”), and the mother of Hannah Sweeney (hereinafter referred to as “Hannah”), the biological daughter of Mr. and Mrs. Sweeney (hereinafter referred to jointly as “the Sweeney’s”). Simpson interview, pg 3. In 2008, the Sweeney’s obtained formal custody of Mr. Simpson from the San Diego, Superior Court in California. Id. at 7. Mr. Simpson was eight at the time of obtaining custody. Id. at 4. The custody agreement awarded sole custody of Mr. Simpson to the Sweeney’s. During the time Mr. Sweeney was alive, Mrs. Sweeney attempted to talk Mr. Sweeney into formal adoption of Mr. Sweeney numerous time to no avail. Id. at 4. Mr. Sweeney did not believe in formal adoption of children, but nevertheless he continued to care for Mr. Simpson as he was his own child. Id. Mrs. Sweeney also spoke with an attorney about adoption while Mr. Sweeney was still alive. Id. at 5. During this time the Sweeney’s fed, clothed, and provided a home for Mr. Simpson without the financial support of others. Id. at 6. Mr. Simpson also went on vacations and took part in events, such as family pictures, that would form a familial relationship, and Mrs. Sweeney wore a “mothers ring” with Hannah’s and Mr.

This was a child abuse case where a Dodge County father and the live-in girlfriend he

David Walker was an abolitionist, orator, and author of David Walker's Appeal. Although David Walker's father, who died before his birth, was enslaved, his mother was a free woman; thus, when he was born in Wilmington, North Carolina, in September 1785, David Walker was also free, following the “condition” of his mother as prescribed by southern laws regulating slavery. Little is known about Walker's early life. He traveled widely in the South and probably spent time in Philadelphia. He developed early on an intense and abiding hatred of slavery, the result apparently of his travels and his firsthand knowledge of slavery.

In David Walker’s Appeal to the Coloured Citizens of the World the message that he wants to spread is abolitionism. However, his message is one that has been pushed a bit further than where the majority of the movement had been with in its overall goals. Considering that the abolitionist movement was considered drastic in the new views on ending slavery, Walker’s Appeal in comparison would seem even more so due to his sense of urgency and belief that peaceful means were not the way to achieve emancipation. According to him, it would never happen otherwise. While Walker does share some basic tenets with the mainstream abolition movement, he expresses his own ideas about what is actually required to live in a free nation, views that were most likely seen as too extreme and the solution unwelcome.

A report was received on 06/05/2017 alleging that the mother (Hermionne) left Ashante (C-V 17) with a non-relative since 02/2017 without any legal rights. According to the report, the mother refuses to take her child back home and will not engage with Ms. Aarons (caretaker) to provide legal documentation for the child to be enroll in school and taken to a Primary Care Physician. Ashante has not been is school for the past 4 months and are unable to enroll in school without paperwork. According to the report, Ashante self mutilates her arms, and the mother refuses to get counseling. The report indicates Ashante was to follow-up with a Cardiologist for a chest pain and the mother refuses to take her to the doctor.

David Walker, the author of the pamphlet -Appeal- was a black man who was born around 1796-1797 in Wilmington, North Carolina. His father was a slave, whereas his mother was a free black woman. As the law at the time demanded, the child of a free woman was automatically a free man; however, Walker lifted the veil of injustice and tyranny that covered the blacks for so long who had became servile and mentally dead. Having being told to whip his own mother to her death was one of the life changing events that fashioned the man he became. After he grew, he moved over to Boston where he started a successful thrift store, having associated himself with various prominent black activists, he became a major spokesperson in the Freedom’s Journal by the end of 1828. By September 28th 1829 he published his Appeal, which comprised of a preamble and four articles namely; Our Wretchedness in Consequence of Slavery, Of Ignorance, Of the Preachers of the Religion of Jesus Christ, and Of Colonizing plan. The primary target was for the black communities that resided in the south, where slavery was of the worst condition. Walker was determined to wake up the black men and women of the society, who he believed had succumbed to the pitiful life of ignorance,

Due to Ms. Lisa Lawson past not allowing services into the home, failure to comply with services, abusive outburst, and neglectful tendencies. The Department request that the Court order Ms. Shelby Lawson into a licensed assistant living facility. In addition, the Department requests that Mr. Jim Madison, brother of Ms. Shelby Lawson become Guardian and the court appoint a Conservator for Mrs. Lawson. Ms. Lawson received a monthly income in excess of 3,000 a month. This is from state retirement, late husband's retirement, and social security

William Walker was an American filibuster born in Nashville, Tennessee in 1824. Walker was considered a child genius as he graduated from the University of Nashville at the top of his class at the mere age of 14. He was a certified lawyer and doctor by the time he was 25 and additionally he worked as a journalist. However, he was not satisfied with his accomplishments. Walker, who lived in San Francisco at the time, set out on an expedition with the intent to capture the small Mexican state of Baja California. Once he captured Baja California he named himself president and applied the laws of Louisiana to the new state, legalizing slavery in the area. By 1854 many men joined Walker’s expedition as volunteers, approximately

Mrs. Bias stated that the Lien Unit took money out of her account without notifying them; they received a letter after the money was already on hold. Mrs. Bias stated she sent the Lien Unit bank statements, direct deposit statements, copies of checks from the credit union, and paid the credit union to pull the drive-thru video to show that she was the one that made the deposits. She stated that the Lien Unit told her the information she provided was not sufficient. She stated she put Mr. Bias’ name on the checking account so that when he was working his checks were direct deposited. In addition, Mrs. Bias stated that the NCP was never on her savings account, which is the account the money was taken from. Mrs. Bias stated the NCP has been laid off since March 2015; there is no money being deposited in the account by neither the NCP nor anyone else other than herself since 2013 because they were separated for a while. The NCP stopped direct deposit for his checks. Mrs. Bias stated that the money she did prove was hers, she sent the Lien Unit proof of direct deposits from her job; the Lien Unit gave her part of the that money back, not all of it. So now, at the hearing, she has proof that the remainder of the money is hers. She

Mr. Conklin’s legal representative revealed through the testimony of the non-custodial parent (NCP), James W. Conklin, that he was divorced from the custodial parent (CP), Kathleen Conklin, in 1989 in the Circuit Court of Madison County. He stated that the documentation presented as Conklin Exhibit 5-Payment Record Letter from the Common Wealth of Virginia Department of Social Service Division of Child Support Enforcement shows as of May 10, 2004 on the NCP’s account the amount of arrears, a record of payments, and charges. The document indicates that the NCP was behind $3,548.49 as of May 10, 2004; the NCP was paying child support. The youngest child was Jason, date of birth May 7, 1985; by May 10, 2004, he reached the age of 19. The

LICENSE TO REJECT: Pending and future vanity license plate decisions in light of Walker v. Tex. Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc.

utauga County DHR Child Support representative’s testimony revealed that the issue is that there was an overpayment and that the custodial parent (CP), Teresa Warren, received a letter that she had to pay back money that she received for child support.

Madison County DHR representative’s testimony revealed that since the main issue is the arrears, the custodial parent (CP), Ms. Foxhill, originally opened her case for child support services in September 2014. At that time, the case was setup on the DHR’s system for collection. DHR instructed the non-custodial parent (NCP) to begin making payments through the Child Support Payment Center. Shortly thereafter on October 31, 2014, the CP closed her case with DHR. On December 18, 2014, the CP reopened the child support case for collection. At that time, DHR ran a spreadsheet in accordance with the CP’s Affidavit of Past Due Support to determine the arrears and interest in December when the case was reopened.

She did not indicate the Appellant’s financial responsibility for the months of need requested. At the administrative hearing she indicated that she was not sure of the amount of the Appellant’s financial responsibility. Regulations found at 55 Pa Code 275.4, state that the Department’s Representative should be able to provide “evidence to support the decision or action, including identification of the pertinent regulations applied in making the decision” as well as a “ detailed computation of the grant”. The ALJ finds that the Department’s Representative failed to explain in detail how she determined the amount of the TANF Diversion payment based on the amount of the Appellant’s financial need. The Department’s Representative agreed that the household expenses had been received but testified that she did not know the amount of the Appellant’s financial obligations because the amount of TANF Diversion issued was based on the fact that the Appellant received zero income in the month of May 2016. The Department’s Representative testified that since May was the only month in the three (3)-month period that Appellant had no income, she was only authorized for one

The learned Attorney at Law Mr. Ronald Mason wrote a crucial article that speaks to the cultural acceptance of deviant behaviours with the Jamaican society, which affects us socially, economically and politically.