Mrs. Iwinski, I and my husband did talk to Kat on Wednesday. We think that what she did was very inappropriate, bad and hurting to the girl. We also explained to her, that when she hears bad things about others, she first of all should stop the gossiper (in this case a person who started “worrying” about someone’s other business was one of these girls, not Kat) and then she should keep everything to herself. I am also very saddened by the fact that it is the second time when adults tried to convince Kat that she must have overheard or simply speaking make up. What I mean is that the first time it was suggested that Kat came to wrong conclusions accusing Abhi of speaking behind her back. From what I know, Abhi apologized to Kat and she also
In the case involving Marianne Stanley vs University of Southern California, Marianne Stanley signed a contact with University of southern California on July 30, 1989 to serve as the head coach of the women's basketball team for four years. Stanley's contract expiration date was June 30, 1993, Stanley's contact provided an annual base salary for 60,000 with a 6,000 housing allowance. Around April of 1993, Stanley and Michael Garrett who’s the athletic director, started negotiating on a new contract. However, the confirmation is in debate with regards to the statement made by the Stanley and Garrett. Stanley claims in her statements that she informed Garrett that she was entitled to be paid the same amount as George Raveling, who’s the head
Based on Elder Vulnerable Client issues unit review (not the correct name of the group), the following was found:
This is a more in-depth piece on the lawsuits made by veterans following the end of the Vietnam War. Claims started being made in 1977 after many veterans were experiencing health issues and having children born with birth defects. They reported the issues to the Department of Veteran Affairs for disability benefit, but the agency denied them of any help unless they could prove it was directly from serving in Vietnam or within a year after coming home. A case worker for the department, Maude De Victor, met a widow of a veteran who died from lung cancer and she believed her husband’s cancer was related to exposure to Agent Orange. De Victor started to ask other veterans about being exposed to Agent Orange and asking the Department of Defense,
NOW COMES, Stephanie Smith, the minor child in the above-captioned matter, and hereby moves this Court for a finding that the Department of Children and Families has abused its discretion, because the Department acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner, by removing Stephanie from the prison nursery, where she resides with her biological mother, Sofia Smith, and placing Stephanie with her paternal grandparents.
We write today to present you with a demand for settlement and the supporting documentation for our demand. As you know, we represent Ms. Betty Brath in the matter of a grievous injury she suffered due to the negligence of your insured. Ms. Brath has reached maximum medical improvement but unfortunately will never fully recover. We are able to calculate her past and future medical expenses at approximately $34,177.73. Her general damages at trial will be approximately $170,000.00. We therefore demand payment in the amount of $204,177.73. We elaborate on this demand below.
In addition there is testimony provided by Elena Poniatowska who collected testimonies given by those woman who were “Soldaderas”, which means a woman who was a solder in the Cristero Rebellion. A specific example I found that brought back the point I made that woman played a large role in the Cristeros who fought in the Rebellion, was an example of a woman who fought along side her husband. Jesusa was a “Soldadera” her job was the same as her husbands to shoot the enemy and make sure that she killed as many as possible. It was much harder for a woman to become a soldier, because they had to hide the fact that they were woman and had to dress as an man. In fact from reading Jesusa testimony it seems that the woman everything to loose if they
Influential advocator, founder, and president of “Families Against Mandatory Minimums,” Julie Stewart, claims that her family was torn apart by the arrest of her brother. Stewarts exclaims that her brother was a first time offender of a non-violent drug related crime, but was automatically sentenced to five years in prison without parole. Stewart mentions that this is caused by the complete power of the laws that were established by Congress in the 1980s and that the judge had no discretion upon the case decision. Because of these drastically harsh laws, Stewart commences her non-profit organization in 1991 and shares various stories of other families who have suffered because of these laws. The organization began accumulating stories on how
Ms. Gershon was deposed at 1 o’clock on September 1st at the office of Plaintiff’s counsel. Her deposition lasted a little over two hours and was the cities primary witness. Plaintiff‘s counsel examination was very easy going and non-confrontational. Ms. Gershon appears to be an older lady, but very put together, well dressed, and appears very educated. Her presentation was very honest and fourth coming. She appears to make a very good witness.
Megan Kanka and several other children have been the reason for the safety of children around this country. I know that you’re wondering in what way this person contributed to the safety of other children. Well Megan Kanko was a 7 years old child who was next door from a previously charged pedophile in Hamilton Township, New Jersey. The difference between then and now is that in the past there were no laws stating that pedophiles had to inform those who lived near them that they were there, of their past convictions, or even some type of registration available. This was the case of Megan Kanka’s offender, Jesse Timmendequas. His record consisted of attempted aggravated sexual assault of a 5-year-old girl in Piscataway, New Jersey, in 1979. He had pleaded guilty to the charges for attempted aggravated sexual assault. He was given a suspended sentence, but he failed to go to counseling, so he was forced to spend nine months at the Middlesex Adult Correctional Center. In 1981, he again pleaded guilty in regards to the sexual assault of a seven-year-old girl and was imprisoned, at Avenel, for six years. He’s an example of a recidivist who was controlled and
Hello all, my name is David Jamison, MHA. I am representing Marion General Hospital as the committee chairman of the ethics committee. I am currently reviewing the case involving female patient Margie Whitson. The patient is a 95 year old patient whom wishes to have her pace maker “turned off”, due to her unwillingness to live. The death of her only remaining son was the last event that, that had forced her to contemplate the reason why she still lives. Mrs. Margie Whitson is no stranger to loss. When she was younger, she lost her youngest son to a severe motor vehicle accident that took his life at the early age of 30. She injured herself over 10 years ago, and received a hip fracture. Her most recently bout was
And finally, there is the issue of staff mismanagement. The supervisor, Keith Frazier, is only checking in with this department one to two times per week. Mr. Frazier is aware that Pat is making international phone calls. He is also aware that Pauline found a way for Pat to make these calls from the building’s elevator once he had the phone system modified to only allow internal calls. Mr. Frazier has also been fielding complaints from the accountants about not receiving their tax schedules in a timely fashion. However, he has failed to confront either of these issues. This lack of management can be attributed to the following:
The following criminal analysis shows why Aileen Wuornos was convicted for the murder of six men and what lead up to these actions. These actions were not in self-defense, but out of cold blood. This profile will analyze the following: what lead up to the murder of these men, what Wuornos’s intents were, the evidence and patterns, her personality and characteristics, and her behavior. These facts and evidence will show Wuornos’s intent and motive, and whether or not she was insane. This woman was not born to be a killer, but something in her life drove her to commit these horrible crimes, and this profile will analyze how exactly she did it and why.
Kat at the start of this film is socially repellent. In her English class, she portrays her intelligence within the class which Joey replies with ‘As opposed to a bitter, self-righteous hag who has no friends?’ which all of his friends laugh and high five him. As you can tell, much like Hortensio and Gremio, this is another dehumanising statement and his friend’s reaction emphasises the male disgust towards Kat. Additionally, her own sister Bianca tells Cameron how she feels about Kat, describing her as a ‘hideous breed of loser… unsolved mystery…a bitch.’ All descriptions of her sister highlight she is hated by all of her peers and HER OWN SISTER, even though in this context female individuality is acceptable. However, at the end, Kat has evolved from who she was once. Kat has a speech which is a clear parallel to Katharina’s monologue. Kat states ‘I hate the way you talk… I hate it when you stare… I hate it when you make me laugh, even worse when you make me cry… I hate it that you’re not around… I hate the way I don’t hate you, not even close, not even a little bit, not even at all.’ The anaphoric repetition creates a cumulative listing effect emphasising each statement intensively in which it is reversed due to the double meaning in the last few lines, making the audience question whether she ‘hates’ that list. As well as that, when she says ‘cry’, there is a medium shot
Karen Johnston is a director of a health planning agency which employs approximately 18 staff members and also serves on the Community Advisory Board (CAB). This program typically incorporates two student interns from her health planning agency. The CAB is a vital program as it advises the program faculty on issues that concern curriculum, internships, job placements, and scholarships.
Products: The clothes are stylish, yet simple and built for comfort. The pieces in the collection were designed to work together, so customers could creatively vary their look from day to day. They were designed to make getting dressed easy, and to be versatile enough to be worn to work and out for the evening. Fisher was adamant about designing clothes for real women and developed forgiving silhouettes that flattered women regardless of their body type. The fluid clothes were designed to take the personality of the wearer.