preview

Mrs Luna In The Bostonians

Decent Essays

The Bostonians: Who is in Charge of the Narrative?
The Bostonians begins with an intriguing tirade by which Adeline Luna preannounces the appearance of her sister, Olive Chancellor, who is one of the most enigmatic and attractive characters in Henry James’ novels and who will be the answer to question in the title. “Olive will come down in about ten minutes” says Mrs. Luna (James 3) , entering the room where Basil Ransom, the sister’s cousin from Mississippi, has waited for his hostess who wrote for him to come to Boston. “About ten,” Mrs. Luna adds to her previous statement and puts rather rambling comments to that, saying “[t]hat is exactly like Olive. Neither five nor fifteen, and yet not ten exactly, but either nine or eleven” (3). Mrs. …show more content…

Because Olive Chancellor, according to Mrs. Luna, “is full of rectitude,” and “is very honest,” so that she does not even “tell [Mrs. Luna] to say she was glad to see [Basil],” because she “doesn’t know whether she is or not,” and does not want to “[tell] a fib” (3). Olive’s obsession about the rectitude with speech here reminds the narrator’s conspicuously peculiar positioning of himself. Olive, the passionate lover, beseeches mercy to her rival, saying that she “[will] do anything – [she will] be abject - [she will] be vile - [she will] go down in the dus” (430), before her rival who comes to her to snatch her lover away, but at the same time, she is the most morbid character who secretly wishes to be “a martyr and die for something” (12). The Mysterious, peculiar, and secluded characteristic of Olive has some similarities with the narrator, about whom the reader can actually know nothing even though the narrator refers to himself as I, like characters. The narrator also want to be distant from the active judgment and to be …show more content…

When Verena “cried, with a laugh,” in the middle of the conversation with Basil, for instance, the narrator tells that “[Basil] knows” that the laugh “ha[s] been expressive of some embarrassment” (323), unlike what it looks like to him, and adds that he does not know the meaning of her laugh. Here, the narrator does not only deliver the descriptions available only to the omniscient narrator, but also points out that it is “her chronicler,” the narrator, who “knows” the characters’ mind (323). The omniscient narrator, who explains characters for the reader, in The Bostonians, interestingly, append seemingly unnecessary explanation about the way the narrator’s mind understands the characters, referring to himself like a character in the novel. This supposedly omniscient narrator, who calls himself like a character, initially loses its highly authoritative and reliable position, and also degenerates himself into the status of historian, who just “gather[s]” the “documents together” about the events happened (260), but nothing more than that. This peculiar position of the narrator seem to make inscrutable, or invisible gaps here and there in The Bostonians, where he seemingly renounces his omniscience which originally penetrates everything. When Olive has a conversation with Mattthias Pardon who wants

Get Access