With regard to Ms. Green’s claims against O’Brien, it is apparent that Ms. Green was O’Brien’s client, and that O’Brien owed Ms. Green a duty. Should this case proceed to trial we do not anticipate that we would argue to a jury that O’Brien did not neglect this duty. Rather, there are serious questions as to whether “the negligence resulted in and was the proximate cause of loss to the client.” Kendall v. Rogers, 181 Md. 606, 611-12 (1943). Indeed, the estate will have to demonstrate that Ms. Green would have prevailed in proving that one or both health care provider defendants committed medical negligence that caused her to fall into the diabetic coma.
1. Claims Against Dr. Rehman
In the complaint, it is alleged that Dr. Rehman breached the relevant standard of care by discontinuing the pharmaceutical Glucovance, and by ordering insufficient monitoring of Ms. Green’s glucose levels; and that Millennium Health and Rehabilitation “failed to property monitor the deceased, ignor[ed] panic values on her labs, [and] misinterpreted the order discontinuing the Glucovance without order of [Dr.] Rehman.”
With regard to Dr. Rehman’s discontinuation of Glucovance, Glucovance is an anti-hyperglycemic drug that is used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes—from which Ms. Green suffered. Glucovance has the effect of lowering a patient’s blood sugar by increasing the body’s natural insulin production, and by decreasing the amount of sugar produced by the liver. Prior to her
On September 14, 2003 the plaintiff, Mrs. Cordero also diabetic, woke up being sick enough to go to the emergency room at Christ’s hospital. Being diagnosed with renal failure, Mrs. Cordero was
In the second case Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital, Corporate Negligence was clearly performed. Invispress.com states that “the existence of the records shows that Misericordia had been negligent in hiring Salinsky”. The facility should have done a more thorough investigation and followed the state’s bylaws and statutes pertaining to the proper credential verification on Dr. Salinsky upon applying to Misericordia Community Hospital before giving him the privilege to practice. If only they would have done that, they would have realized that Dr. Salinsky had falsified numerous statements on his application. I personally think that both the hospital as well as Dr. Salinsky are both at fault for the permanent damage they caused the patient
The Department of Human Resources received a report on Ms. Sue Salter on 9/17/14 alleging Ms. Salter a paraplegic who is paralyzed on her left side was living in a home with no water, power, and had an inadequate caregiver. During investigation, utilities were reconnected and Hospice service provided. Hospice stated Ms. Salter was losing notable weight and found lying in urine during visits. Due to this, several bedsores increased and the doctor ordered a catheter and low air mattress. Ms. Harville, the caregiver was educated on wound care numerous times and demonstrated a working knowledge but choose not to administer wound care.
Mark Skornia filed a complaint against Dr Kenneth Smith alleging mismanagement and misdiagnosis of the complications after his mother Arlene Skornia was admitted to Mercy Hospital in Washington, MO on August 13, 2013. Mr Skornia’s primary concerns are his mother did not receive nourishment for 7 days, Dr Smith lacked the ability to appropriately titrate pain medications, and Mrs Skornia was released from the hospital with no plan in place or consultation with the family.
On 5/13/2015 I met with Dr. Navato at Centerpoint Medical Center. Dr. Navato was familiar with the complaint as she had submitted a narrative response to the BHA in February of 2015. The allegation was that Dr. Navato did not honor a (Do Not Resuscitate) order.
In response to these allegations, Dr. Emmer advised that he could testify that that Dr. Rehman’s discontinuation of Glucovance was not a breach of the standard of care. In support of this opinion Dr. Emmer attested that Glucovance is an anti-hyperglycemic drug that is used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes—from which Ms. Green suffered. Glucovance has the effect of lowering a patient’s blood sugar by increasing the body’s natural insulin production, and by decreasing the amount of sugar produced by the liver. Prior to her hypoglycemic event, Ms. Green had been prescribed Glucovance to treat her type 2 diabetes, but fourteen days prior to the event Dr. Rehman discontinued Glucovance. Dr. Emmer submits that not only was discontinuing Glucovance not a breach of the relevant standard of care, but discontinuing Glucovance would have affirmatively reduced Ms. Green’s risk of suffering from hypoglycemia. This is so because, Glucovance, as a glucose-reducing agent, would have increased Ms. Green’s risk for a hypoglycemic event, and discontinuing that drug would have helped to abate that risk. Moreover, Dr. Emmer claimed that Glucovance has a half-life of two-to-three days, and that the drug should have been completely
Ashley had a diabetic episode during a class where a substitute was teaching. She needed her glucose medication and the substitute would not allow Ashley to get the medication from her bag. The substitute also denied Ashley’s request to go to the nurse. Ashley took it upon herself to go to the nurse anyway. Ashley did not make it to the nurse since her blood sugar was so low. She was found after the class very ill and disoriented and she had to be taken to the hospital in an ambulance. The family was told by a doctor that this could have been a potentially fatal situation for Ashley.
In this scenario, I believe Nicole is guilty of several intentional torts. Due to her financial stressors at home, Nicole wholeheartedly decided to supplement her husband’s lack of income by risking the safety and well-being of her patients. Based on her educational level by completing nursing school, I feel Nicole was well aware that if patients were not receiving their prescribed medications, many medical and behavioral issues may arise.
Somebody should intervene Nadarajah has made Assessment, which contained documents to confirm the status but imply I was requesting a treatment they introduced. Experiencing academic failure implicated from visitation. Their treatment shifted patient into worsened nervousness. Ones work and income obligation lead to malcontents disruptions leading through penalties eventually rapture with medical facility and disenfranchisement. Quickly following administration's negligence it was implicated in the medically inflicted incidences.
It was reported that on 10/10/16, by resident Darcia Getty (age 53, DOB 07/08/63) and resident's sister Donna Cowell that the facility has not provided the resident with her medication. Per ED physician note dated 10/10/16: "Woman" at the the board and care would not give the resident her medication until she ate her oatmeal. It was also mentioned that the resident has wondering thoughts and hysterical at times. EMS reports chaos at the scene, the resident was throwing things and screaming. LPA contacted RP to verify the name of the resident and original reporting party, as the name on the narritive did not match (Ms. Reed was a misprint).
In order to prevent injuries that come as a result of medical malpractice, we must understand how negligence/malpractice happens in the first place – through medical errors. When we are healthy we don’t generally pursue medical attention on regular basis. Patients do not usually visit their doctor’s office until they are sick or have injury. From my experience, most times when patient’s health gets worse, sometimes it’s difficult to recognize whether it was because of the current circumstance or because of mistakes or medical error in the treatment offered.
Though he was cooperative, Dr. Sundy was distressed and dismayed that this complaint was made and the efforts Richards took not only to notify his direct supervisor (Dr. Morey Gardener) but also the president of St. Mary’s Medical Center as well, let alone bringing it in the first place. He was of the opinion that the Board should be investigating “real” issues” instead this
On my last week visit with the client, I was glad and satisfied with the outcome of my teaching with the client about her self-administration of degludec insulin and other medications. The patient reported of remembering to administer subcutaneous insulin in the morning and feel so much better and have more energy when she gets up in the morning and had better result of daily glucose monitoring instead of being so low which causing her to be weak and shaky. The patient reported that she does not feel any shaky or weakness upon waking up in the morning and have more energy playing with her dog and more energy throughout the day. The patient also included in her weekly schedule of going to the community swimming pool 3 times per week and
In this case the four elements were clearly neglected by the nurse. Duty, dereliction, direct course, and damages had to be present in order for the patient to sue the nurse. The patient suffered injuries due to a procedure that was administered by the nurse. The process also caused other injuries to the patient. This gave the patient the burden of proof she needed to prevail in her lawsuit.
In the case of the Eureka nursing home, the family was right in suing the nursing home, due to the negligence of their loved one. The Sharp family entrusted Granada Rehabilitation and Wellness Center Nursing Home to care for their loved one, who suffered from dementia, and yet failed to monitor the lack of bowel movements, which resulted in her demise. And the worse part, this was the fourth claim of negligence from this particular facility, which should have been taken care of with better staffing.