The case study involving Ms. Julia Kate supports strong evidence that she has a clear claim for EPA violation. Although there are obvious distinctions between an EPA and Title VII violation, it can safely be surmised that she has enough evidence to suggest that a Title VII claim can be filed as well. Even though the colleagues of Ms. Kate are credentialed with a Ph.D. and M.Ed, this does not minimize her very own credentials as having a Masters degree in social work and her licensure for management of interns. Furthermore, Ms. Kate maintains a specialty designation, of which her colleagues do not hold. Therefore, Ms. Kate has proven that her skills, responsibility and performance deserves a second review and equality in pay. Once the claim
Julie Mialaret is my mother and she is 53 years old. My mother exercises very rarely because of her intense work schedule. She says it is hard for her to have the energy everyday to work out after long work hours. She has never smoked in her life because she does not find it appealing. Mrs. Mialaret eats a very low-fat diet and eats very small portions. My mother eats very healthy and is able to maintain her weight without exercise. She faces no barriers when it comes to eating healthy because growing up she ate little portions and couldn't afford fast food. I would like to change my eating habits to better reflect my mom's diet however, I would like to incorporate some sort of exercise into my daily routine. My mom hopes to start exercising
On this date worker spoke with Mrs. Julie Johnson after meeting Mrs. Marilyn Beaird. Ms. Johnson stated she wanted her mother taken care of and did not care what happened to her father. According to Mrs. Johnson, her father has always been a mean person and beat her and her mother. Mrs. Johnson is afraid Mr. Beaird will flip out one day and kill everyone in the home himself included. Due to this Mrs. Johnson had Mr. Beaird committed a few days ago. She is now afraid that if Mr. Beaird returns home he will "finish the job." According to Mrs. Johnson, her father has many connections due to his mining work and his wealth.
In the case of Cindy Countess, severely mentally ill best fits her, because she had been “prescribed to Paxil to help in her mental illness that was like her mom” (FilmRise). According to Dr. Heide, “severely mentally ill offender suffers from irrational thinking and behavior” (CriminologyTV). Countess clearly was thinking irrationally after taking Paxil and that led to her behavior of mixing Paxil with alcoholic drinks and from there killed her mom in the bathroom. In my opinion, the best verdict for Countess would be second degree murder, because it was a killing done impulsively without premeditation. Countess also did not recall her killing towards her mom, due to the amount of Paxil that she took in addition to having alcoholic drinks
Ms. Ledbetter alleged that several supervisors had given her poor evaluations in the past strictly because of she was a female. The ultimate result was that Ms. Ledbetter’s pay had not increased as much as it would
The Twin Falls School District Board of Trustees is pleased to announce Sara Praegitzer as the new associate principal at O’Leary Middle School and Justin White as the new associate principal at Robert Stuart Middle School. The new administrative hires were approved at a special board meeting Thursday, July 20, 2017.
Stephanie was referred to FACT for CMO services by Trinitas Hospital – CCIS unit. Stephanie was admitted to CCIS on 4/18/17 for running away from her mother’s home and making threats to hurt self if she were to return to reside with her mother. While in the hospital, Stephanie has also been refusing to visit with mother. At the time of the FCP meeting, Stephanie (Youth) resides with her Natalia Ramos (Mother), Elsa Sanchez (Maternal grandmother) and Johnathan Sanchez (Uncle) who disabled. Mother and stepfather recently divorced. Her father Hamilton Ramirez (biological Father) lives in Elizabeth with his girlfriend and younger daughter. Each biological parent has children with other people. Parents do not get along at all. Youth wants to live with father.
Ms. Gracie Holguin stated Ms. Julia Calderon gets confused which further upset Ms. Julia Calderon. MS. Gracie Holguin stated she and her sister, Mary Seal , have temporary conservatorship of their father, Mr. Rudy Calderon Sr., however their brother, Rudy Calderon Jr., is currently petitioning them in court. Ms. Gracie Claderon stated she has set up appointments for her Ms. Julia Calderon, per her request, to appoint a POA but Ms. Julia Calderon never held an appointment when the date arrived. Ms. Gracie Holguin believes Mr. Rudy Calderon wants to have both their parent with him for financial gain. Ms. Gracie Holguin stated her Mr. Rudy Calderon Sr. was not at the home this day due to her having solar panels installed so she took him
The underlying issues in both cases are racial discrimination. For Cheryl Boulden in the affirmative action case the issue is being “an African American woman among the good ol’ boys in Indiana.” She was recruited because of race and her permanent handicap was seen as an asset for a diversity program lacking any. Yet these qualities made her a target of racism. Susan Finn’s ethnic discrimination presents a dilemma of how to deal with a contract physician’s abusive behavior “toward Hispanics and female staff as well as patients” (Reeves, 2006, p. 79). While the issues of racial and gender discrimination is not unusual, the failure of these agencies to address multiple complaints is.
I made contact with Angela LYLE who stated that she had come home from work to find in her mailbox a letter. That was addressed to resident dog owners of 244 Kingswood Dr. The letter states that the writer lives on the 2100 block of Allendale Dr. and in the letter there are several vague threats to the residents and their dogs. LYLE stated that she no longer feels safe in her own home or to let her dogs out. see report for pictures of the letter. LYLE all so advised that she believes the letter came from 2194. Based on some of the descriptors in the
All types of pay are incorporated — compensation, rewards, excursion and occasion pay, and different advantages, to give some examples. The Demonstration additionally permits people to petition for pay segregation claims under Title VII of the Social equality Act. Managers are legitimately restricted from retaliating against representatives who make a move against biased practices in the work environment. Notwithstanding, the law takes into account pay differentials when people are assessed in view of criteria, for example, status, generation levels, and legitimacy. Regulated and upheld by the U.S. Break even with Occupation Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the EPA was marked into law in 1963 as a major aspect of the Reasonable Work Guidelines Demonstration of 1938. Its worker insurances and denials against separation adjust it to other government laws, for example, Title VII of the Social liberties Demonstration of 1964, the Age Segregation in Vocation Act (ADEA) of 1967, and Title I of the Americans with Inabilities Act (ADA) of
The last decade has produced an explosion of racial employment discrimination lawsuits. These lawsuits have resulted in record-breaking settlements. By federally mandating every business to review the history, impact and proposed policy of Article VII these lawsuits may subside. Reviewing Title VII is a step corporate America must soon make or continue to loose much needed revenue. Our team will discuss the history of Title VII, the impact of Title VII in the workplace, who is and who is not covered under Title VII as well as propose policies that companies should have in place to avoid Title VII violations.
Being an interagency task force, the Equal Pay Task Force has worked closely together to build a strong foundation in order to ensure long-term success in ending pay discrimination. In the spring of 2010 the EEOC and the DOJ created a “pilot project” in which they efficiently investigated and consulted over 125 cases of pay discrimination (pg7). This interagency cooperation has trained over 2000 enforcement personnel, as well as providing online training to the various departments on how to address and handle pay discrimination more effectively. To ensure future success this task force has also worked with academic experts to use the best means of data gathering, doing so will give the Task Force transparent information to investigate future cases (pg8).
Gender discrimination. Made to wear certain clothing, hire only women at Hooters, and can't be pregnant. Title VII protects genders being disciminated upon. Both females and males can be discriminated upon. For a prima facia case. Has to be a member of a protected class. Given adverse action of lower pay. Even though qualifed for the job as a server. This is discrimination.
Winifred Stanley (R-NY) proposed a bill in 1944 to amend the National Labor Relations Act with no success. Then in 1950, Rep. Katharine St. George (R-NY) attempted to pass the Equal Rights Amendment though again, with no success. Notably, Katharine St. George is credited with coining the phrase “equal pay for equal work” (Cho 2013). During the second wave of feminism which began in the early 1960’s and lasted through 1990’s, emphasis was focused on passage of the Equal Rights Amendment, reproductive rights and social equality (Rampton 2015). Subsequently, in 1963 President Kennedy signed the Equal Pay Act into law. Although momentum stalled between signage of the EPA and the early decade of the millennium and we have yet to pass the Equal Rights Amendment, this could change if Hilary Clinton is elected President of the United States and continues the work that Obama started. President Obama has been committed to equal rights from the beginning of his presidency; in fact, the first bill he signed into law was the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pair Act of 2009. This act is an amendment to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and changed the statute of limitations for filing an equal-pay claim for pay discrimination. Prior to this law, anyone claiming discrimination was required to file within 180 days of the alleged offense, the alleged offense was formerly the first paycheck received where discrimination was claimed. Clearly this
Discrimination complaints are subject to strict time limits and must be within 180 days of the offense unless the offense is also under coverage by state or local anti-discrimination laws. However, only state laws have the capacity to extend the time of filing limit to 300 days. If the charges fall within the scope of the Equal Pay Act (EPA), the time limitations do not apply, but because claims also fall under Title VII sex discrimination, most claimants are under advisement to file charges under both laws with observance to the strict time limits of each. Mediation is another step in the complaint