Finally, we would like to address Mr. Craven’s assertion that the Hospital used Ms. Reeves’ PHI for “commercial advantage.” The penalties for wrongful disclosure of PHI significantly increase if the offense is committed with the intent to sell or use PHI for that purpose. While HIPAA does prohibit the “sale of PHI” for commercial advantage, it expressly excepts the disclosure of PHI for treatment and payment purposes from the “sale of PHI.” As we discuss in this memorandum, the Hospital did not sell, wrongfully disclose Ms. Reeves’ PHI, or otherwise violate HIPAA.
In the health care business, there are certain standards and laws that have been put in place to protect our patients and their personal health information. When a health care facility fails to protect their patient’s confidential information, the US Government may get involved and facilities may be forced to pay huge sums of money in fines, and risk damaging their reputation.
Explanation: According to both HIPAA and ARRA regulations, healthcare organizations compels to allow all reasonable efforts to limit the disclosure of information to the minimum necessary data to accomplish the purpose of the request (McWay, 2010). Based on the information provided, the request for PHI fails to specify the date of validity of the release of PHI. According to the HIPAA privacy rule, a request for the release of PHI is invalid if the request meets the following specifications (1) expiration date not specified that is related to purpose of disclosure, or the date on the request for information has elapse, (2) If the authorization request have been revoked, (3) failure to clearly state the intended purpose of release of information, (4) failure to provide signature and date of authorizing the disclosure of information ( or failure to provide specification of the representative’s authority to act on behalf of the patients), and (5) failure to specify the entity disclosing and the recipient entity (Department of Health & Human Services, 2004). There
Exploiting patients is also discussed and can be called into question. When presenting examples or discussing patient’s certain information should never be disclosed due to HIPPA laws as well as confidentiality.
The importance of protecting patient’s health information is not something that can be taken lightly. As employees in the healthcare field, we are given the responsibility of protecting patient information. HIPAA has given us rules and procedures to follow that make protecting this highly classified and vital information easy, if those rules and procedures are followed to the letter. When an employee does not follow the procedures that have been given to them, they are in clear violation of these rules and should be punished.
Our case assignment clearly shows that Dr. Williams acted unethically and violated HIPAA by showing his patient’s health record while seeking advice from a friend. His violation was specifically indentified in the Privacy Rule, which protects PHI “held or transmitted by a covered entity or its business associate, in any form or media, whether electronic, paper, or oral” (Office for Civil Rights, Privacy Brief, 2003). Whether Dr. Williams is a covered entity or a business associate with a contract is unclear but we can be sure that electronic health care transactions occur in his clinic subjecting him to the Privacy Rule along with other federal statutes and regulations.
Since the adoption of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996, there had been some modifications and interpretations made to its provisions to ensure that the requirements of the law are strictly adhered to. Thus, the “two sets of federal regulations were implemented… the Privacy Rule and the Security Rule” (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2015, p. 157). Briefly, the Privacy Rule addresses the limited use and disclosure of patients’ health information, while the Security Rule refers to the need to safeguard “patients’ health information from improper use or disclosure” (McGonigle & Mastrian, 2015, p. 157). The case scenario discussed in this paper relates to the Privacy Rule and Security Rule of HIPAA.
For this week’s discussion I have read the article assigned this week regarding HIPAA violations. I will summarize the case against the physician and what the HIPAA law states. I will also discuss what the penalties are for a HIPAA violation and if this physician could have faced further charges.
The purpose of this study was to prove that HIPAA protects individuals against the unfair reveal of their health information.
Release of Information in healthcare is critical to the quality of continuing the care provided to patients. It plays an important role in billing, reporting, research and other functions. The HIPAA privacy rule has specific rules for the management of health information to ensure confidentiality of each individual. The rule will balance the need for prompt and informed delivery of health care services with that of protecting the individual. There are no standard uniform state privacy law in use of all 50 states, yet the territories. State laws focus on for example HIV generic information as well as a degree of strictness or protectiveness of patient privacy. Some states need that additional patient authorization be obtained prior to release, but some states do not. The law required that healthcare organizations develop, implement and maintain policies, processes and procedures around release of information. Overall management of those HIM processes that shows the fundamental to confidentiality, security and compliance in releasing protected health information. It is important that the organization 's policies and procedures include the management practices that support the process of disclosure and it 's oversight.
HIPPA is a government act signed into law to ensure portability of insurance between jobs, and to safeguard patient information confidentiality in an effort to protect patients and reduce healthcare fraud and abuse. Protected Health Information (PHI) includes anything “personally identifiable” within a patient’s healthcare information, the unregulated sharing of which can cause unwanted complications within a patient’s life, including but not limited to, emotional distress and discrimination by others. HIPPA is intended to regulate the release of PHI by focusing on three major focus areas in the healthcare workforce.
The HIPAA Security and Privacy Rules mandate that healthcare providers and organizations and their respective business associates abide by HIPAA rules when they create and follow procedures that must be transmitted, obtained, handled, or shared. In addition, during these processes, the confidentiality and security of all protected health information (PHI) must be achieved and maintained (Hernandez, 2015). Moreover, there are instances when PHI can and cannot be disclosed. Stanford (n.d) differentiates between information that is “shared” and “disclosed.” Shared applies to PHI utilized within the covered entity; whereas, “disclosed” pertains to PHI shared outside of the covered entity (Stanford,
When confidential patient information is disclosed without consent it is a violation of the HIPAA Title II Security Rule. This rule was enacted in response to private information being leaked to the news and emails containing privileged information were read by unauthorized people. Identity theft is a real concern so patient privacy should be taken seriously. This is a rule can easily be broken without the
Any HIPPA covered entity should be extremely knowledgeable about HIPPA regulations. Any potential and even harmless disclosure of a patient’s protected health information can leave a physician susceptible to several criminal and civil penalties. A breach or violation of HIPAA occurs when a healthcare provider impermissibly uses or discloses information that compromises the security or privacy of the “protected health information”. In order to compete in the market without being liable for sanctions, a healthcare provider must have a thorough understanding of how to properly run a business without violating HIPAA.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) indicates that HIPAA violations have been generally increasing throughout the years. Now that electronically maintained patient information exists, it has become increasingly difficult to limit information sharing in a manner that guarantees usage for its intended genesis. Personal information travels across several channels, to include healthcare providers, third party payers, and other business associates. Few controls exist to regulate how this information is maintained, or disseminated. If state law or local legislation does not forbid accessing patient health records or sharing patient information, any information held by a provider or business associate could be passed
Regulations are established to expand the effectiveness and efficacy of the healthcare organization. One of biggest health care issue among the system is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) violations. It was passed by the Congress in 1996. Mandating this rule serves several purposes to all individuals for privacy and security. This includes all information that is verbal, written, or electronic. The Privacy Rule is the protection health information (PHI) of a patient and it cannot be disclosed without patient’s written authorization (Schulman, 2005). The Security Rule is emphasized on administrative, technical and physical safeguards specifically for electronic protection health information from unapproved access (Schulman, 2005).