Multi Projects Case Study

The paper is divided into three sections, the first of which will establish a timeline of events. This project background will serve as a case study for the analysis in the following section that will be structured such that each of the previously mentioned facets will be independently analyzed and contrasted with project management principles. Finally the paper will conclude with a summary of the analysis and recommendations based on

Project management (PM) system processes are essential for successful performance within an organization. ?Successful performance leads to customer delight, although insured, is totally possible through proper application and quantifiable control of project management processes?, (Akkiraju, n.d., p. 2). Project management involves components that PM mangers follow when preparing to enter into a venture. The PM use planning, hazard management, execution management, change

The Matrix Organization structure will be used to complete this project plan. The General Manager will

Matrix – is a permanently designed to reach detailed results using employees from other areas within the company (Chand, n.d.). This structure uses a horizontal reporting within the hierarchical function structure. Some of the advantages are distributing decision making, strong project co-ordination, and there is a fast and flexible response to change. There is, however, the cost of administration is high, authority and responsibility can be confusing, and group decision making can be exaggerated. Within this structure, there are functional and product managers. The functional managers oversee the daily task of functions to keep the business going whereas the product manager oversees getting the products

Any successful project management, regardless of the organizational structure, is only as good as the individuals and leaders who are managing the key functions. Project management is not a single-person operation; it requires a group of individuals dedicated to the achievement of a specific goal.

In determining the organizational methods for projects, the project can be either organized via the pure project organization in which the project is essential stand-alone from the parent organization, the project could be organized in a way that is completely dependent upon the parent organization, or the project can be organized in such a way that utilizes both methods taking in all of the great advantages; only resulting in minimal disadvantages when it comes to management. As one of the most significant advantages of the matrix project organization method, being able to be closely related with the parent organization, allows for constant communication and access to resources. “Because the matrix organization is, or can be, connected to any or all of the parent organization’s functional units, it has access to any or all of the parent organization’s technology.” (Mantel, S., 2011) Furthermore, “this allows the functional departments to optimize their contributions to any project. They can meet a project’s need in a way that is most efficient.” (Mantel, S., 2011) In regards to the disadvantages, the management is where the struggles exist because there are administrative supervisors and technological supervisors. This divide in management may seem to result in some confusion of who to report to and when. Also, what resources from which side of the management, I would say could cause some sort of impairment on overall

In this paper, I, a student of University of Phoenix will explain and discuss project management. I will address three main points. I will first answer what is a project. Secondly, I will discuss what are the basic phases of the project lifecycle and their purpose. Finally, I will explain why it 's important for organizations to use project management to accomplish tasks.

There seems to be no any other organizational structure more efficient than matrix in this project-based business. As pointed out earlier, matrix organizational structure is most suitable for corporations which exist in environments which cannot be easily predicted, are pressurized to meet their customer needs and requirements quickly. Medical Countermeasure Systems is a good example of such companies. Furthermore, the organizational culture of MCS impels it to assume this form management form (Dartey-Baah,

This project manager determines specialists, performance requirements, etc. The company is results-oriented therefore, efficiency is imperative (Gray, & Larson, 2008). Flexibility concerning resources and expertise amongst human capital provides any employee with the right skills an opportunity to become a valuable member to the team. The matrix structure is stressful, and dysfunctional. Conflict does occur when project managers and functional management disagree. The company structure preludes to the culture of an organization and how teams work together (Gray, & Larson, 2008).

The lack of communication within a project is a form of bottlenecks. Create effective methods of communicating with parent company, staff, and customers. Individuals like a direct source for their information. In addition, when one project manager believes he is better than the other manager (Kerzner, 2006). The project entails matrix structure is a compromise in an attempt to obtain the better of two worlds. This type of management tries to achieve maximum technology, cost effectively within time and schedule constraints (Kernzer, 2006).

Barker, J., Tjosvold, D., & Andrews, I.R. (1988). Conflict approaches of effective and ineffective project managers: A field study in a matrix organization. Journal of Management Studies, 25 (2), pp. 167-177.

A paper submitted in partial fulfillment of MMIS 621: Information Systems Project Management course requirements

“A matrix organizational structure represents the middle ground between functional and project structures. Personnel often report both to a functional manager and one or more project managers” (Schwalbe, 2014). In the CDB project Corporate Banking, Corporate Trust, and Consumer banking involve to this project. Project Management Office is a good way to coordinate the contradiction between those divisions.

The Blue Spider Project is an example of how a project manager incorrectly balanced the staff and work, resulting in a poor performance from a project. We see that Parks

Read the following case and provide a minimum of three reasons why problems occurred on this project, and what should have been done to prevent these occurrences.