Is Canada’s Policy of Multiculturalism a success? Canada has 9.98 million square kilometers in total, which is the second largest country in the world. Also Canada is the country with the most immigrants. Therefore, Canada uses multiculturalism as a policy and in my opinion I think multiculturalism is success.
Before the European settlers came to Canada, the Indian and Inuit lived on this land. During 1680 to 1760, the French people came here and built a city. From 1760 to 1867, lots of people from Britain came to Canada, and the numbers of British over French people. After that, more and more people from Europe, Africa, Asia and American came to Canada. According to the statistics of Canada, there were 35,749,600 people in Canada on April
…show more content…
It leads the country going to a bright and healthy future. However, many people do not agree this policy, they doubt and criticize the multiculturalism. The surface disadvantages of multiculturalism are education, professional, fear of influence and risk of social conflict . The children of first nation and immigrants are hard to accommodate the new environment and influence their study. Maybe most of the results are good for the organization but it is very hard for manage the workforce with different culture. Living in a multicultural society it is easy to be influenced by other culture and lose the own culture because all the culture are mix together. And because of all the cultures are mixes together, the habit, the religion belief and custom will have conflict, and then two groups will against each other. The first deeply reason is French Canadian and first nation think multiculturalism damage the social status and benefit of them. French Canadian think two official languages policy and multiculturalism policy are mutual contradiction. Multiculturalism reduces the equal status of French Canadian in two official languages. And first nation people think multiculturalism do not mentioned the rights of them, and they think Canada government consider that British and French are the nation who “build” the
The Multiculturalism Act ensured that Canada would become a melting pot similar to our American neighbours.
here about their own ways of life. Canada has a culture that is made up of many because of all the
Why Multiculturalism Can’t End Racism The author Marlene NourbeSe Philip (2008) in her article, “Why Multiculturalism Can’t End Racism” talk’s about the inequality among the different cultures in Canada on the basis of color or background, nationality moreover, she narrates that, according to Canadian blueprints of the multiculturalism, only two cultures, the French and the English are recognized, however other natal cultures are not diagnosed. Philip, argue that the present policies, regarding multiculturalism, originate the problem of racism instead of untangling it furthermore, she provides an example of Ontario authority, new strategy of multiculturalism, in which the government reported the crucial issues, related to the color of skin and race but the latest federal bill does not determine the multiculturalism and they just refer color only. She observes that Canadian system gives more preference to white Europeans and it puts them on top and provide more power to them in society as compared to the native, black and African individuals as they put them on lowest part society.
Canada is internationally renowned for its commitment to multiculturalism. In fact, Canada was the first nation to officially adopt a multicultural policy. However, while the Canadian government has developed a broad-based multicultural mandate that includes a national human rights code and increased penalties for hate-motivated crimes, and most Canadians oppose overt forms of discrimination and hate, racism continues to exist in Canadian society, albeit in a subtle fashion.
So having a lot of languages, shows our diversity. With the Multiculturalism Act, our people have become diverse as well. This diverse culture runs through ordinary citizens. After the act was established, there have been many cases in schools and outside where we have shown a respect to our diverse culture. In my school, if a person has to pray, they can go to a separated room and pray however many times they like.
Canadian and American cultural views were different which was proved because one is multicultural and the other is not. Canada was known as “mosaic” which means immigrants from any ethnic group were accepted here and were allowed to practice their religion. Therefore, they have a double identity ,meaning they are their ethnic group before a Canadian citizen as in Japanese-Canadian, Asian Canadian and so on . Whereas ,American culture was known as the “melting pot “, where they accept other cultures however they encouraged their citizens to give up their original culture ( Wells ,10 and 11 ). Canadian’s usually describe themselves as “NOT AMERICAN“(Wells,35) . Many Americans view Canada as a positive nation and as a better environment to live in then the United States . A legal sectary from Gastonia ,North Carolina said “Canada’s such a terrific place, I’d move there tomorrow if I could” (Wells, 35). This proves that Americans want to come to Canada since it is a safer environment due to it’s unique culture. Canadians are recognized as more modest, less aggressive and more down to earth then their southern neighbors (Wells,35).
Multiculturalism has many positive effects, including but not limited to freedom of religion and beliefs, increased
The government of Canada decided that the country could be a mosaic of cultures where people from different countries could keep their nationalities and still be called canadian therefore allowing an influx of different cultures. The royal commission came up with the idea of "cultural pluralism" and encouraged the government to reflect this in their policies. Pierre Elliot Trudeau, the prime minster in 1917 accepted this policy called the multiculturalism policy. In 1988, the governement of Canada also imposed the "Multiculturalism Act" . The factors influencing these two policies/acts were quite similiar to one another. In mid-1960s, the troubled English-French realtions in Canada desperately needed a solution. They preferred the idea of a cultural mosaic. After establishing this policy racism reduced significantly as every ethnic group was to be treated the same way, allowing canada to be a cultural hub. In the context of theory so far everything seems to be working smoothly but the real question that we need to ask ourself is whether multiculturalism is working in our society or not ? Do we feel comfortable living amogst all the different kinds of people and are content with our lifestyle? Take education for an example. A university in North America called Stanford had a program in which the curriculum was designed
While the rest of Canada employs the concept of multiculturalism, Quebec emphasizes on another theory: interculturalism, or the notion of support in cross-cultural dialogue and challenging self-segregation tendencies within cultures. In the province, the word multiculturalism announces pejorative meanings. This was due, in part, to the fact that “a federal commission which was charged several years ago with the task of developing policies for Canada, based on its bicultural and bilingual character emerged with a recommendation that Canada think of itself as a multicultural and bilingual country.3”. Francophones, on the other hand, felt that this concept placed them at the same level as minority ethnic groups, thus erasing their thoughts of being seen as one of the country's founding nations.
Immigration has grown to become a big aspect in today’s society in Canada. Most cities have welcomed immigration, although mainly portrayed in bigger cities. Immigration in Canada has come with its share of pros as well as its share of cons. The pros with the immigration in Canada starts off with the racial blending of persons in the community, giving future generations a more positive outlook towards equality for all races because they grow up in a world that, for them, hasn’t seen racial and cultural inequality. In my opinion, in a world where children aren’t aware of the cultural and racial inequalities that had been put forth in the generations before them is an enormous strength to immigration for the fact that every person has a right to life and liberty and to have those ideas implanted in the generations to come is detrimental to a working society. Cons found in immigration in Canada fall in employment. The more people immigrate to Canada, the more jobs are being filled leaving others without any. The Immigration Refugee Board is able to offer a wide
In terms of education, multiculturalism is becoming increasingly disruptive in Canadian society. It seems that there is a new issue in the media focus regarding education on a weekly basis. It's becoming increasingly apparent that most, if not all issues in recent years stem from the debate of whether to centralize or decentralize our current system of education. Proponents of centralization argue that a standard national system of education will provide all people with access to the same quality of education. On the other hand, proponent’s of decentralization claim that individual educational institutions will provide a level of education that is sensitive to
Canada is routinely defined as the exemplar multicultural society with the most diverse cities in the world such as Vancouver, Toronto and Quebec. The concepts of integrity and complexity are being shaped in Canadian society because of its co-existence of different cultures. Indeed, multiculturalism has been a keystone of Canadian policy for over 40 years with the aim of pursuing Canadian unity (Flegel 2002). Accordingly, Canada is generally estimated a country where people are all equal and where they can share fundamental values based upon freedom. Diversity is sustained and promoted by governmental policy, however, there are still racist interactions, which are destructive to minorities integration, especially recent ethnic groups’ arrival (Banting & Kymlicka 2010). This paper will examine challenges that multiculturalism has brought society and residents of Canada.
Canada’s identity comes in many shapes and forms. Multiculturalism has been adopted and is at the forefront of Canadian identity. Following the Second World War, Canada’s multiculturalism policies became more acceptable and even successful in, not only accepting, but inviting multiple ethnic cultures in. In contrast to other countries, multiculturalism adaptation works for the Canadian culture. Canadian policies on multiculturalism have shifted over the past few decades; policies are now implemented for integration, not discrimination.
Canada is one of the first countries in the world that has issued multicultural official policy since 1971. The concept of multiculturalism is referred to academic views about the equality and respect for variant cultures, religions, races and behaviours within a country. This terms has been used to form Canadian identities and strengths for almost a hundred and fifty years. For the past two decades, Canadian population is increasingly diverse and multicultural by the huge wave of newcomers who will adopt and immerse different “cultural practices” in contributing to the national development (Parent & Clydesdale, 2016). It is essential to make sure that all citizens acknowledge both similarities and differences in Canadian diverse society.
The reasons why advocates of multiculturalism argue that tolerating and accommodating differences strengthen national unity are as follows. Primarily, accepting other society’s culture and religion encourages individuals of the respective culture to come together to form strong bonds, which is an important aspect of national unity. Secondly, a nation formed of different societies and cultures, example like Canada, USA, and so on, benefits from accepting and adhering to the philosophies of multiculturalism to encourage the growth of that nation. Moreover, consideration of multiculturalism forms strong bonds between people of different cultures and encourages better communication, and greater cohesiveness, which in turn creates a stronger nation. Hence it is advisable to encourage this principle of diversity. Another advantage of embracing multiculturalism allows immigrants to feel accepted and safe in their new adopted country. This feeling embosses a sense of belonging and ownership, which are important aspects of every citizen. Furthermore, embracing multiculturalism advances society by achieving greater innovations by allowing those with different outlooks or perspectives to speak and contribute to society.